• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the Sino-Soviet split of the late 1960s the result of ideological differences between the two Communist powers?

Extracts from this document...


How far was the Sino-Soviet split of the late 1960?s the result of ideological differences between the two Communist powers? Throughout the 1960?s the fracture between the Soviets and Chinese was evident. The newly founded alignment between the two powers was deteriorating so drastically that disputes were resulting in armed conflicts. Their differing viewpoints on what communism should be may have been an important factor on the split occurring. Nonetheless, there were many other factors such as the personalities of the leaders, the national interests that tied in to the geopolitics between the two superpowers. Ideological difference were key to the Sino-Soviet split. Mao was heavily critical of the Khrushchev?s plan of peaceful-coexistence with the USA and saw it as turning it?s back on communist ideals. ...read more.


A split was inevitable. There were many factors to the split, personality being one. As Mao had based his view of communism around Stalin?s policies and regarded him as a role model, he saw himself as the heir to lead the communist revolution. When Khrushchev claimed the title he thought this was incorrect as he was Khrushchev?s ?superior?. This would have been important, as Mao may not have been able to take Khrushchev seriously if he deemed him as inferior and not worthy of the position. Relations were strained even more when Khrushchev preformed the secret speech and put forward destalinization. This would have been a big blow to the relations as yet again this was Mao?s idol and was an indirect criticism of how Mao ran his government. ...read more.


Both claimed rights over this region however it was the USSR who had military bases in this area. This led to a few skirmishes. China wanted to assert its influence and prove itself as a world power. Naturally the USSR wanted to stop this, as it would have been directly threatened. They had come into direct action and could not turn back now. In conclusion, all factors are important to understand why the Sino-Soviet split occurred. Ideological differences were the primary cause for disagreement between the two superpowers as they criticised each other on both domestic and foreign policy. This was influenced by their personalities and who they wanted to become. And the final factor, national interests, led them to a direct conflict in which they then parted ways and into the arms of the USA. They were both fighting for the existence of communism but could not co-exist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    Many had not been paid in six months. The USSR found it impossible to afford the costs of being model communist state, chief benefactor and defender of communism all at the same time. How and why did Gorbachev and Reagan help to end the Cold War? Despite their many differences, Reagan and Gorbachev needed each other: * Gorbachev

  2. How far did life improve for the following groups between 1949 and the early ...

    in action achieved: two to three hundred families, all having surrendered land, animals and equipment to the co-operative and being paid nothing except for what they earned in the fields for it. The immense pressure and control on Chinese society (wall-posters, censorship and propaganda everywhere)

  1. How Far Did Life Improve For Women, Landlords, Businessmen And Peasants Between 1949 And ...

    'Small' capitalists were allowed five percent interest on investments until the mid-'60s and minor businesses were allowed to continue under private ownership until 19566. Mao even said, "...there should be no encroachment upon industrial and commercial enterprises..."7 in a speech in 1948.

  2. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    not strong enough to keep them united, and despite the universal label of 'communism', in practice, the differences were too great and drove the two countries apart. Conflicting ideology was often the excuse used to justify divisions between the countries; however, in some cases it was a facade hiding other factors that were instrumental to the split.

  1. How far sas the Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    This was diametrically opposed to the close working relationship of Stalin and Mao in the 1950s who shared ideological views. Mao had great respect for Stalin and had based his domestic policies upon his ideas, and so was offended by Khrushchev's Anti-Stalinist speech at the Twentieth Party Congress of February 1956.

  2. The Sino-Soviet Split

    Considering the immense pressure that the CCP was under in the weeks immediately following the revolution, it is understandable that this lack of interest should place Mao in a dilemma. Forced to present the Soviets as the heroes of the Marxist cause in order to strengthen the Chinese population's faith

  1. Explain the reasons for the Sino-Soviet split in the 1960s And 1950s

    Overall this was part of a long term effect on the Sino soviet split. Short effects that made a small contribution to the Sino-Soviet split were that the soviets made fun of the fact that China was not able to handle the technologies that Russia had.

  2. How Far was the Sino-soviet split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    Stalin, it was clear that neither nations agreed on the direction of a communist nation. This would mean that a split was inevitable; they were not striving for the same goal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work