• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How successful were Nazi economic policies in the years 1933-45? When the Nazi Party came to power in 1933 it had two main aims - to solve unemployment, and to make Germany as strong an economic and military power as possible, so that the humiliating and devastating defeat of the First World War could never happen again. In order to do this, several areas had to be tackled. Firstly, unemployment was huge and rising steadily - in 1933 six million people were unemployed. Secondly, the party had promised better conditions for workers, and this had to be balanced with continuing the good relationship that the Nazis had with businesses. In order to build up Germany's military strength after the under-funding and downsizing that Versailles imposed, large amounts of funding were needed for the armaments industry and the armed forces. Lastly, the Nazis wanted to create autarky - making Germany self-sufficient and ready for war. The stages of the German economy - The economic recovery, the four year plan and the war economy, all reached different extents of success, to which are subjective to their strengths and failures. The 'success' can be divided between the policies aims, and the results, the results being of most importance. Germany had faced continuing economic problems since the end of the first war, those problems then worsened coinciding with the world economic depression that began in 1929. ...read more.

Middle

Schacht negotiated several trade treaties with countries in South America and southeastern Europe, under which Germany would continue to receive raw materials, but would pay in Reichsmarks; these agreements were the bilateral trade treaties. This ensured that the deficit would not get any worse, while allowing the German government to deal with the gap which had already developed. Schacht also found an innovative solution to the problem of the government deficit by using mefo bills, the main purpose of these were to disguise government spending. Through Schacht's new plan and past economic ideas, he had laid the foundations for economic recovery by mid-1936. This was therefore assumingly a very successful policy in regards to it's results. However, there were disagreements over priorities. As Schacht favored boosting exports this would resort in slower rearmaments, whilst the armed forces were already demanding more resources for rearmaments. Hitler therefore favored rapid rearmament. Also, Schacht had only questionably hidden the balance of payment by a series of financial tricks and as the demands for rearmament and consumption for goods increased, the balance of payment would actually go deeply into red. There was therefore a divide between the governments expenditure into arms production over the production of industrial goods, leading to the question: should the economy concentrate on producing "guns or butter?". The Nazi leaderships economic policy here was therefore criticized for it's over-interest in re-armament and it's priority taken over trade, peace and consumer goods. ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite this, Germany had the capacity to produce more and the occupied territories of the Third Reich were not exploited with real economic efficiency. Also, allies blanket bombing prevented Germany from increasing it's levels of arms production even further. Speer therefore had some major early successes, but these are shadowed by the later fundamental problems and failures evident in the later years of the war. In the end, the Nazi economy had proved incapable of rising to the demands of total war and the cost of the failure was a major factor in the ruins and economic collapse of 1945. In conclusion, the condition of Germany's economy was not static and was fairly inconsistent throughout. There were some large successes in regards to it's economic recovery at the hands of Schacht, whose success benefitted firstly sympathetic supporters of the Nazi party, followed by the major decline in unemployment and economic stiunulation brought about through his reforms and work schemes. However, his method of the balance of payments could be seen as a series of financial tricks that would not be beneficial long term. The four year plan increased arms production but through it's limitations, did not prepare or mobilize Germany for war. Speer had some notable successes in the early total war period, but the Nazi war economy could not provide for the demands of a total war economy. So therefore, after the recovery, the condition of Germany's economy got progressively worse, and even through there were some successes, the extent of failure in the later total war years shadowed these. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay is a very thorough and detailed account of Nazi economic policy and shows an excellent level of knowledge and understanding of the topic. In a timed exam question it would be better to deliberately select and focus on a few key aspects of the policies and focus more on the analysis of the impact and extent of success rather than attempting to cover so much detail on the period . ****

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 01/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Using these four passages and your own knowledge, assess the view that Napoleons Empire ...

    5 star(s)

    society?powerful class.? Interestingly, interpretation B mentions that ?rebellious Spain?at best tenuous,? Spain lacked an influential bourgeois class, meaning that the Civil Code was ineffective in states that had a lacking bourgeois class. Showing that only certain subject states, that had already started to industrialize past feudalism, would benefit as a member of Napoleonic Empire.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the successes and failures of Mussolini's domestic policy.

    5 star(s)

    and the State in the late 1920s, but his policy of anti-Semitism started in 1938 was condemned by the Church, which weakened the totalitarian state throughout the 1930s, with its newspaper L'Osservatore Romano and the FUCI student federation. However, it gave Mussolini and his Fascist Italy a lot of prestige throughout the world.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    They replaced ministers of the Duma with their 'friends' and this meant that there was nobody organizing food, fuel or other supplies. This was, therefore, a cause of the shortages on the home front. The transport system wasn't run properly and couldn't supply the factories, people and army at the same time.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    It was a very idealistic look on life and a target that many though couldn?t be achieved. The idea of a industry based community was one which had not ever existed. Stalin thought that by making his workers live and work as one in one place not only would he

  1. Discuss the success and failure of the Vienna Settlement.

    The Vienna Settlement ignored the force of liberalism. It was drawn up by aristocratic statesmen of the old order, who had little understanding of the new age. They thought that revolution was accidental, without realizing that it was caused by the failure of the old political system to meet changing social and economic needs.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    A war also occurred with France in 1870, but it is the war itself with Austria in 1866, previously promised by Bismarck, which changed the course of German history forever. Talk had been considered of a united Germany, but little came of it, as discussion could not decide whether Austria

  1. What impact did war have on the French Revolution 1789-1799?

    The battle of Fleurus in June 1794 was the first of a series of successes that continued until all the members of the First Coalition, excluding Britain, had been knocked out of the war. Due to Napoleon's massively victorious campaign in Italy in 1796, the revolution was expanded into other

  2. To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War ...

    believed in Social Darwinism and that the German desire for living space in the East was a right. This suggests as the Intentionalist Historians have always maintained that Hitler planned a war from the start. The Nazi?s had run Germany on Militaristic lines and geared the nation for a war in the east against Bolshevism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work