• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Luther and the Peasants

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Luther and the Peasants Sources A and B are useful when analysing Luther's attitude towards the Peasant's War, yet there are certain ways in which they do not entirely reflect his own views. As events unfolded during 1525, Luther's attitudes to the peasants transformed, and this is demonstrated in the two sources. From the sources, it is clear that between March and May of 1525 Luther's feelings about who was to blame for the actions of the peasants changed, showing that he initially believed they should not be blamed for the chaos that unfolded, but eventually came to the conclusion that their later actions were unnecessary and therefore condemns the peasants instead. As this issue directly targets the views that Luther held in reference to the Peasant's War, it is appropriate that all of the views expressed in the sources are those of Luther himself. As they are both the direct opinions of the man himself, and as Luther was never one to refrain from expressing his controversial feelings, it is fair to conclude that they give an accurate representation of Luther's attitude at the time. ...read more.

Middle

Ultimately, the sources coincide with Luther's opinions at the time and so it would appear that they are a good reflection, yet as it is about to be made clear there are also ways in which the sources potentially do not give an entirely accurate overview. One possible way in which the sources are ambiguous is through the possibility that the sources do not accurately reflect Luther's true feelings, as he may well have just been using them to gain support. In Source A, Luther does not want to fully alienate the Peasants, and so therefore gives the impression that the actions were justifiable just so that he does not loose their support. Instead he uses the opportunity to attack the "blind bishops and mad priests and monks" that instead of working to bring an end to the "mischievous rebellion", chose to "flay and rob [their] subjects". ...read more.

Conclusion

This means that they can not give an entirely thorough analysis of Luther's overall feelings towards the Peasant's War, as they do not take in to account the proceedings that took place throughout and after the period of the Peasant's War. On balance, it would appear that both Sources A and B generally reflect the opinions of Luther towards the Peasant's War, but there is also a possibility that the reason behind their issuing may have been to gain support from the different groups which he needed to gain the support of, and it is also necessary to be aware that there are several other factors that could mean that sources are not entirely reliable. For these reasons, it is possible to conclude that although they provide a good degree of evidence when analysing Luther's views towards the Peasant's War, it is always important to consider that they have also been influenced by the requirement for Luther to gain the support of the Peasants and yet not to be seen as responsible for the increasingly violent methods which were being employed by the peasants. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    Corporal punishments were pretty much the same as before. People's oaths were taken into account and allegations would be dealt through the local church, or if serious, undergo trial. This involved three kinds of ordeals (hot iron, hot water, cold water) but the Normans proposed 'Trial by Battle', where both the accuser and accused would duel.

  2. The First English Civil War

    Moving by the Welsh border, and gathering up garrisons and recruits snowball-wise as he marched, he went first to Cheshire to give a hand to Byron, and then, with the utmost speed, he made for Newark. On 20 March 1644, he bivouacked at Bingham, and on the 21st, he not only relieved Newark but routed the besiegers' cavalry.

  1. Free essay

    Why was Martin Luther so popular by 1521?

    Nevertheless, the conflict with Rome proved to be a significant source of support for Luther. Additionally, a crucial factor for Luther's gain in popularity was the fragmented and decentralised political structure of Germany at the time. With no centralised government, no sufficient effort was made to prevent of the spread of Lutheran ideas.

  2. Strategy in Cortes' conquest of Mexico

    As far as Montezuma was concerned, Cort�s might have come to Tenochtitlan to form an alliance.14 Although he certainly did not reveal these objectives to Montezuma, Cort�s came into Tenochtitlan with the main goals of subduing the Aztecs, and securing the gold and other treasures of the realm, but also

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work