• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Soviet Union and Eastern Europe

Extracts from this document...


?The Soviet Union developed its influence in eastern Europe in the years 1945 to 1949 because it simply wanted to guarantee its security in the future.? How valid is this assessment? The statement is valid due to the fact that the Soviet Union had previously been invaded twice by Germany in 1914 and 1941 and had legitimate security fears when the Western allies began supporting Germany. Consequently, Stalin may have thought that the Soviet union, needed extra security to prevent an invasion re occurring. Also, the USSR often made decisions in response to others around them, especially the USA, as Stalin always aimed to ?match? his rivals. Firstly, one reason the statement is valid due to the USSR?S genuine fear of another invasion as it had happened twice before and this fear was not quelled with the USA and the Western Allies helping Germany recuperate after the war, increasing the possibility of a resurgent Germany which terrified the Russians. ...read more.


Not only does this follow on from my previous point that the USA vilified the Soviets but also the Russians expanded gradually, this disproves a large chunk of the telegram as it cannot be aggressive expansionism if the Russians were expanding gradually and through elections often. However there is evidence that shows although the Soviet expansion was gradual, it was not always done sincerely like agreed at the Yalta and Potsdam conferences it was often the case in the satellite states, that the elections that had been agreed to take place to determine the countries futures, were often rigged and would therefore put the communists in power, so the agreements at the conferences were not obeyed. However, in relation to the telegram and the content of what Kennan said, there is evidence behind it that also helps disprove the statement. Communism is a major factor in itself due to a key element of it being that it should be international, and spread throughout the world. ...read more.


Britain and the USA, ultimately though that Stalin was exploiting the weaknesses of vulnerable Eastern European countries, aswell as exaggerating the use of the Soviet Union?s buffer zone. To the western world, this looked as if it were the beginning of serious Soviet aggressions, therefore naturally the Western powers were feeling defensive, and wary of Stalin?s plots. In conclusion, I believe the statement that the Soviet Union only expanded into Eastern Europe for security reasons is valid. Although the western powers believed that Stalin was over utilising a ?buffer zone? as an excuse, to continue to dominate Eastern Europe, in my opinion, Stalin was seriously concerned about another Western invasion, and he felt more secure with other Soviet occupied Eastern European countries surrounding the USSR. Although Stalin may have expanded too much, and consequently made the western countries feel defensive, I believe that Stalin was mainly concerned about security and paranoia may have led to the worries of Britain and the USA in particular. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Soviet Union developed its influence in Eastern Europe in the years 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    action in Angola was not troops it was aid and again it was in reaction to the USA helping the MPLA party first but the severity of this situation was increased as China was dovetailed with the USA in contributing in Angola.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    However, he could not say things like that in public as the British people would not have agreed. The USA * The USA had only entered the war in 1917 and so had suffered very little damage. In fact, for the first two and a half years of the war

  1. The Collapse of Communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe

    These trends- of economic decline and accompanying dissent- were clearly of predominantly internal beginnings. Basic faults in the system, such as excessive state control, corruption, over-emphasis on industry and the military, in addition to the characteristically repressive environment, caused the crisis situation to emerge as rampant by the 1970s.

  2. The Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe

    53 workers were killed in Poznan by the Polish army. Shocked by this, Khrushchev moved troops to the Polish border. By October that year, Poland had a new leader, Wladyslaw Gomulka, he was popular with the polish for the next couple of years.


    took place - some Russian miners were accused of collaborating with foreigners to weaken the Soviet Union. * Stalin began to talk about Collectivisation as the way forward - to control the peasants as much as to hasten industrialisation. * Bukharin attacked this is in 'Notes of an Economist' in 1928.

  2. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    However, the speedy resolution of the Iraq conflict caused oil prices to plunge further, exacerbating the economic problems that the SU faced during the Western recession of 1990. The Soviet Union was not overthrown by people's power in terms of a revolution, not by strikes, large-scale anti-government demonstrations, unlike in the Baltic states, Czechoslovakia, and Poland.

  1. Why did the Soviet Union maintain a presence in Eastern Europe? And why did ...

    According to Dawisha, "Having opened the floodgates for 'creative Marxism', Stalin and his influential minister of culture, Andrei Zhdanov, enunciated the famous 'two-camp theory', which both reflected and strengthened the post-war division of the world into two great power blocs" (Dawisha, K, 1988, pg.

  2. Events in the Soviet Union brought down Communist regimes in Eastern Europe - Discuss

    He constantly referred to this as "activate the human factor"2, both workers and managers alike needed to be taught and shown that they could no longer carry on in their lax and corrupt ways. Gorbachev failed to appreciate that the very foundations of the Soviet command economy were outdated and detrimental to promoting and maintaining a successful economy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work