• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 is one of the most significant dates in the history of Europe." How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 is one of the most significant dates in the history of Europe." How far do you agree with this statement? Word count 1896 Europe, in 1917 was in a state of disrepair; the First World War was wreaking havoc on both the western allied front and the eastern Russian front. Although industrially backwards Russia had originally entered the war, in 1914, in high spirits, winning many victories over Germany, but by 1917 disillusionment with the regime had spread: "In two and a half years the Russians had suffered five and a half million casualties; the troops were short of ammunition, the civilian population of food; the transport system was in chaos; and the Government was so divided by petty feuds that in the last twelve months of Tsarism, there were four different Prime Ministers, three different War Ministers, and three different Foreign Ministers."1 These casualties led to dissent from the army and thus provoked the series of revolutions that had been occurring since the beginning of the twentieth century, for protests had erupted causing the Tsar, Nicolas II to establish a constitution and a legislative, (Duma) with a Prime Minister, in order to grant some democracy into the system in 1905, and in February (occurring on the eighth of March by the western calendar) of 1917 strikes and riots broke out, the troops sided with the rioters, revolting against the Tsar who was forced to abdicate. ...read more.

Middle

"At Versailles the peacemakers were haunted by the 'spectre of bolshevism' spreading from Lenin's newly created Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, (USSR)."8 This mistrust in the left was provoked by Lenin's government actively persuading revolution across the world "The Russian newspaper, Pravda proclaimed on the first of November 1918, 'The World Revolution has begun...Nothing can hold up the iron tread of Revolution'".9 These attacks on the systems of the west in turn, led to countries to withhold recognition; such as Britain until 1924, the US until 1933 and Yugoslavia until 1940. These actions secluded Russia, leaving her cut off from the allied forces, "The pre-war balance of power was stricken at its roots; the revolution inaugurated twenty years of virtual isolation for Russia"10 And so throughout the inter war years Russia had to turn inward and to small states. This isolation stemmed from the revolution due to the revolution being that which brought a communist government to power, the capitalist west thereby disapproving and as such meant that as a weak nation the newly formed Soviet Union turned to Nazi Germany and negotiated the Nazi-Soviet pact on the 23rd of August 1939, in order to maintain neutrality in the face of an impending war. This action left the world stunned due to the two conflicting ideologies cooperating and thereby adds justification to the idea that the October revolution was extremely significant to European history for it added weight to the Nazi campaign towards the Second World War. ...read more.

Conclusion

And therefore there are other epochs that give rise to the changing nature of Europe and how it is seen today. The Bolshevik revolution has been a catalyst in the evolution and explosions of war across the continent, however, by allowing the protests and revolutions of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to provoke the revolt on Petrograd in the February revolutions the October revolution may not of occurred, for it was through the Dumas' failure to produce a governmental system capable of leading Russia after the fall of the Tsar that left the government open to a coup d'etat by the Bolshevik party. This fear of similar revolutions further isolated the new USSR and caused rise to extremist right-wing activity such as the Nazi party who promised to 'defend against the threat of communism' thus in turn leading to that which caused the Second World war, and from that the Cold War as the fear of a strong communist country propelled the USA into a stalemate and arms race with the nation. The Bolshevik revolution in essence was in preparation for a series of revolts and uprisings across the continent, for, "Lenin had justified the timing of the Russian October Revolution by referring to the imminence of Revolution in Europe."15 However, instead it caused the isolation of the USSR and therefore created a shadow across the eastern part of Europe, which threatened the democratic west with the slow approach of communism, and therefore the Bolshevik revolution was highly integral to the formation of Europe as it is seen today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How far do you agree that the Cold War broke out in Europe because ...

    4 star(s)

    The USSR then uprooted and shipped the majority of the heavy industry in Germany. The West viewed these developments as violations of those nations' basic rights and a clear disregard of the Yalta agreement, which clearly specified the splitting of Germany into four occupied zones, with only one under the USSR.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Unfortunately he soon ran into opposition from Woodrow Wilson, the US president, who did not to see new empires created. Great Britain * Great Britain had not suffered anything like the same amount of damage as France. There had been no fighting in Britain, but some coastal towns had been

  1. How Significant were the Normandy landings in Defeating Germany in World War Two?

    Also he is speaking in the present tense so it is obvious that what he is talking about is currently going on. There are several things that it does not say in the text, perhaps because Stalin does not know this, or perhaps he is holding back.

  2. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    The war may have had a leveling effect in many ways, but it also sharpened some social differences and conflicts. Soldiers were revolting just like workers: They [soldiers] were no longer willing to sacrifice their lives when shirkers at home were earning all the money, tkaing, the women around in

  1. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    grown to 5 million soldiers, 20 times the size of the Whites. Nonetheless, it was not only the fact that the areas were greatly inhabited that gave the Reds so many men but it was also the universal aim to preserve the revolution that provided the men with the impetus to fight.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    What if, in a demonstration, they failed to detonate? Thus, as horrible as it may seem in retrospect, no one ever seriously doubted the necessity of dropping the bomb on Japan once the weapon was perfected. On the Russian issue, however, there now seems little doubt that administration officials thought long and hard about the bomb's impact on postwar relations with the Soviet Union.

  1. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    However, the system failed to provide any adequate incentives for harder work or technical innovation that were so badly needed.22 Here the problem lay for the Soviet government. To get the growth needed, a major overhaul of the system was necessary, especially, as Bunce highlights, a movement from planning to

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    Does not the fact that Khrushchev clearly realised this, indicate his superior economic strategising and leadership? The creations of Khrushchev’s policies of Détente and Peaceful co-existence, steamed from Khrushchev’s tenure into that of every succeeding leader: for the sheer benefits which these policies brought.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work