• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14

The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction The Cuban Missile Crisis was the pinnacle of the Cold War. While the Cold War continued for many years after the crisis, it was the closest the United States and Russia ever came to all-out nuclear war.i The crisis was started when a U-2 spy plane flying reconnaissance over Cuba, sighted various missile sites in different stages of completion. Upon further examination, it was found that the Soviets were constructing many Surface-to-Air Missile sites and a handful of Medium Range Ballistic Missile sites, giving the Soviets the power to launch nuclear missiles against any major city in the United States. Before this, there had been little worry of nuclear war, as Soviet missiles did not have the technology to be able to be launched from Russia and reach the United States, but with these new developments, the Cold War took a new horrifying turn.ii President John F. Kennedy was faced with a dilemma as to what he should do about the missile sites in Cuba. If he were to leave them be and do nothing, he would be seen as weak and afraid to take action, however if he were to attack, he would be seen as a tyrant attacking a small poor country by surprise.iii Eventually, he decided on a Naval blockade of Cuba and a demand that all missile sites be dismantled and sent back to Russia. Thankfully, this solution worked and nuclear war was avoided. But the question has always remained; why did Kennedy choose the blockade solution? Many historians disagree as to whether the blockade was the correct route to take in resolving the crisis in October of 1962. Some believe that Kennedy should have gone ahead with the air strike followed up by an invasion, simply to show the world that the United States was not a country to be fooled with.iv Others believed a more diplomatic solution was called for; one in which no aggressive action would have been taken, thus reducing the chance of retaliation.v ...read more.

Middle

Many felt that the air strike option seemed a bit too much like the attack the Japanese made against the United States in World War II at Pearl Harbour. The fact that it would be a surprise attack, that was mostly unwarranted, gave it a cowardly sort of feel that President Kennedy did not like one bit.xxix Some even argued that the United States would eventually lose all of Latin America, as other countries would follow Cuba's example, and team up with the Russians, or another power.xxx Another strong argument for the air strike was the issue of time. Each day that passed in inactivity, more missiles became operational and the danger became more and more real to the United States and it's people.xxxi However, if an air strike were ordered, the Russians might get nervous and launch a nuclear missile early. The main reason for not choosing the air strike was the fact that there was a large risk of an outbreak of general war if the air strike went ahead. President Kennedy could not bear the responsibility of being the first to start a nuclear war. The consequences of this would be of an unimaginable horror.xxxii Another main reason that Kennedy did not like the idea of an air strike was that it would have to be followed up by an invasion. The problem with this was that Kennedy did not want to send so many men into battle, around a quarter of a million.xxxiii Another problem with the invasion was that it would mean the United States would control Cuba, and while this may sound like a good thing, at the time, it wasn't. President Kennedy simply did not know what to do with Cuba once he had control of it, he could either install a new leader and leave it, or put it under US control, neither of which he really wanted to do.xxxiv These were small decisions to make compared to Kennedy's main dilemma, whether to risk nuclear war just because the United States got scared when Russia did the same thing as them. ...read more.

Conclusion

At any given moment, people around the world were living in fear and anxiety, wondering if Russia or the United States would launch the first missile. Thankfully, neither did, and the crisis was resolved peacefully, a big step towards the ending of the Cold War. i Keith Eubank, The Missile Crisis in Cuba (Florida: Krieger Publishing Company, 2000), 5 ii Aleksandr Fursenko, One Hell of a Gamble (United States: W. W. Norton and Company, 1997), 12 iii Roger Hilsman, The Cuban Missile Crisis: Struggle Over Policy (United States: Praeger, 1996), 32 iv Dino A. Brugioni, Eyeball to Eyeball (New York: Random House, 1990), 23 v Robert Smith Thompson, The Missiles of October (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992), 29 vi Herbert S. Dinerstein, The Making of a Missile Crisis October 1962 (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1976), 19 vii Brugioni, 37 viii Graham Allison, Essence of Decision (New York: Longman Publishing, 1999), 127 ix Carlos Lechuga, In the Eye of the Storm (Australia: Ocean Press, 1995), 83 x Dinerstein, 26 xi Dinerstein, 30 xii Dinerstein, 35 xiii Brugioni, 52 xiv Dinerstein, 57 xv James A. Nathan, Anatomy of the Cuban Missile Crisis, (Westport: Greenwood Press, 2001), 28 xvi Mark J. White, The Cuban Missile Crisis (United States: MacMillan Press, 1996), 41 xvii White, 45 xviii Brugioni, 52 xix Dinerstein, 55 xx ibid, 51 xxi White, 49 xxii Laurence Chang, The Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962 (New York: The New Press, 1992), 73 xxiii Brugioni, 33 xxiv ibid, 34 xxv Norman H. Finklestein, Thirteen Days / Ninety Miles: The Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994), 62 xxvi ibid, 68 xxvii Dinerstein, 72 xxviii ibid, 78 xxix Eubank, 28 xxx Ernest R. May, The Kennedy Tapes (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997), 44 xxxi Brugioni, 61 xxxii Hilsman, 38 xxxiii Chang, 79 xxxiv Allison, 134 xxxv May, 67 xxxvi Thompson, 31 xxxvii ibid, 35 xxxviii May, 71 xxxix Allison, 84 xl Brugioni, 69 xli Thompson, 40 xlii May, 61 xliii ibid, 64 xliv Brugioni, 68 xlv May, 83 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    . this weapon rather ostentatiously on our hip, their suspicions and their distrust of our purposes and motives will increase." Echoing the same them, Dr. Harold Urey, a leading atomic scientist, told the Senate that by making and storing atomic weapons, "we are guilty of beginning the arms race."

  2. Were contemporaries correct in regarding President Kennedy as the Saviour of The Western World ...

    Kennedy said he caused the Soviet Union to end their threats and forced them to withdraw their missiles from Cuba. American Contemporaries fully respected Kennedy and throughout the crisis viewed him as the "saviour" of the western world, Theodore Sorenson actually states that Kennedy "saved the world" Furthermore, he refers

  1. From Cold War to Detente 1962-1981 - Cuban crisis and international relations.

    The Soviets put nuclear missiles on Cuba, and understandably the USA did not like this as it was so close to their Country and therefore posed a big threat to them. Kennedy overreacted and his actions risked nuclear war. In the developing stages Kennedy was naive and believed that Khrushchev would not deploy missiles on Cuba.

  2. why did a crisis develop over cuba in 1962

    A profit that is made is the reward for their work. Capitalism also follows the belief of opportunity for all and average standard of living higher then under communism, but a wide spread between rich and poor. America also had a free economy, Americans had a choice of many parties for government, which would be chosen by the people democratically.

  1. How far was the Cuban missile crisis the most significant event in the ...

    of Reinsurance Treaty is more of a key turning point in international relations than the Cuban Missile Crisis within the period 1879-1980 because it led to a proliferation of conflict were as the Cuban Missile Crisis resulted in a peaceful coexistence which arguably didn?t last very long.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    [24] Khrushchev?s methods of agricultural melioration were not merely intended for economic gain; they posed the first signs of agricultural and social advances. Taxes and compulsory state quotas was reduced, private plot was reintroduced, wages amounted, surplus labour was rewarded not demanded and Stalin?s practically insufficient ?collective farms?, were lessened

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the most serious U.S.-Soviet confrontation of the Cold War

    Further photographic evidence on the size and type of the Soviet buildup was obtained during the following days as high altitude air surveillance was greatly increased by the President.

  2. Free essay

    The Cold War did not become fully global until after the Cuban Missile Crisis ...

    Then it evolved into a spread of capitalism (US and Western Europe) vs. spread of communism (USSR). Countries such as Poland, China, etc. fell under communism, so the US wanted to end communism causing wars in Vietnam and Korea. Already by 1940 it seemed that the cold war was having

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work