• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The war on the Western Front.

Extracts from this document...


Coursework Assignment: the war on the Western Front. Question 1 After analysing sources A and B we can now focus in perspective the point that neither source is more reliable than each other. Source, A which is a second hand source, may be written much later than the picture was taken, however this does not mean that the author is not accurate with the details. The effects of artillery can be seen from Source B but however source A gives us more insight to the events that took place, from the picture we can not see of what the written source states. Considering these points we cannot state that totally reliable nor can we state a source is totally useless. Source A may be a second hand source however it is still reliable and after analysing this source it does not contain much bias. In addition to the previous aspects source A's caption states that the extract was used for textbooks in British schools. Furthermore source B does show that the effects of the artillery were devastating however in the question of reliability source B could have been of that o a British Army on the contrary the British did commence and did carry on to defeat the Germans at this specific point. Taking these points on account neither source is more reliable than each other in spite of this source B the picture was taken by someone of the bombardments, ...read more.


Another factor of the poster, which is accurate, is that the soldiers are in trenches. Trenches were dug all along the western front during the war. This was a war of attrition of wearing the opponents out however in spite of this the source is not as accurate as the soldiers are smiling. The conditions in the trenches were appalling, soldiers would have had to some limbs amputated due to the unhygienic conditions of the trenches but from the poster we can see the people smiling. The war especially on the western front was often regarded as a holiday. The image of going to war and killing a few soldiers and to be back home for Christmas was very common. Posters like this were used to support the war effort. This advertisement is propaganda and uses these holiday images to attract the British people to not only buy the cigarettes but to go and fight and then while there in there trenches and a cigarette. We can often imagine this and creates a very vivid image that it was so muddy in these trenches the only thing clean would be these white sticks in their mouths. Today we would call this source very ironic as I have stated before standing up in a trench was very dangerous. The soldiers are smiling, which was not a common site as feet and other parts were amputated. ...read more.


This quote reinforces the fact that even these brave young men that have come to fight or their country are screaming we can not imagine this but the source states them to scream if you would go any where near them. This overall clearly states that conditions were very poor in the trenches leading to a very slow and painful fight between the two sides. In my opinion I feel that considering all the aspects above we can now come to conclusion that the sources do help explain why the first World War lasting so long. In addition to the above people thought that the war had lasted so long maybe due to the fact that it was the First World War and there had been no other event such as it and no one really knew the timescale of such thing as I have stated above some if not all people thought that the war would be over before Christmas indoctrinated by many posters such as source F which increased the moral and spirits of those who were fighting. I think people thought it lasted long also due to the fact that they thought the war would be so short and the difference occurred were such a vast time gap people thought it had lasted long. Today we still do not have all the knowledge on how long a war should actually take, as there have only been 2 world wars. Hopefully it will be kept as this. Mujthaba Ahtamad 11(c) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Stalemate was on the western front for many years.

    German civilians were experiencing severe shortages. The German ports were blocked with help from the USA. The Germans responded with submarine warfare. Once America had joined the war they made themselves targets. Many American lives were lost. The Germans offensive in March 1918 Ludendorff's plan was to break through on the Somme, swinging northwards through Albert and roll up on the British line.

  2. Was the public misled about conditions in the Trenches?

    They might be joining because they have to or have been made to by law. So I think eventhough source D is a photograph it doesn't 100% prove that sources A and B made these specific men in the photograph join the army.

  1. The War On The Western Front.

    But as you can see the two sources are very different, so one of them obviously is not very reliable. I think that is source E is more reliable because it was written for a book specifically about Field Marshal Haig, where as source D is written for a book that is about the war in General.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    This area included not only the ten-kilometer-deep security belt adjacent to the Israeli border but also a vertical north-south corridor running from the border to the Litani River and splitting the UNIFIL area into two noncontiguous zones. Other parties frustrated the UNIFIL peacekeeping efforts.

  1. The war on the Western Front.

    Although this is not the point of view of a soldier but of an officer so it is what he thinks a soldier would have thought of the Generals. It also might be an exaggeration of the feelings between the soldiers and their leaders.

  2. How important was Haig's tactics on the Western Front in bringing an end to ...

    He was taught and trained mainly with the use of horses in everything he did. Consequently, he saw the horse as a great advantage of the enemy, even better than guns. It was well documented how he believed warfare should be handled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work