• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the US president hinder rather than help the development of African American civil rights in the period from 1865-1992?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐To what extent did the US president hinder rather than help the development of African American civil rights in the period from 1865-1992? It can be argued that over the period 1865-1992 the majority of the presidents hindered the development rather than help as the presidents Johnson to Cleveland actively slowed down the civil rights. However, it can also be said that some of presidents did help the African Americans to a large extent, for example in the 1960s Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson actively help the African American?s through their policies. Presidents at the start of the time period might have hindered the development because of their white supremacist views, prioritising reconstruction and the need to maintain white Democrat support in the South. Presidents between Cleveland and Kennedy and after Ford can be categorised as passive relating to the issue of Civil Rights. They were distracted many events such as the Great Depression, Vietnam and the Cold War which lead to hinder the development of African American. Although most hindered the development and were passive, by 1992 presidents had created Civil Rights for African Americans. ...read more.


Grover Cleveland and Woodrow Wilson both help white supremacist views, the former boasted he had never shared a table with an African American; the latter dismissed all black advisors to the White House. However, it can be argued that this continuity of hindering happened due to the social attitudes as new change wouldn?t be accepted by many America. Furthermore, world war one was Woodrow Wilson priority not civil right. Therefore, it can be said the ww1 also lead to slowing down the process of civil right development. Those presidents who were passive, I believe hindered the development of Civil Rights as they were not part of the solution. I believe they were indeed part of the problem. Theodore Roosevelt through to Hoover achieved very little as they were unsympathetic, useless or preoccupied. These presidents stood by as African Americans were segregated, discriminated and oppressed. For example, Theodore Roosevelt was criticised by white supremacist for holding official meeting with booker. Therefore it can be said that he was scared to take any favour for African Americans. Furthermore, president like Woodrow Wilson held racist view therefore; he was unlikely to help civil right development. ...read more.


Also, Kennedy and Lyndon were crucial for helping African Americans gain civil rights. Kennedy efforts to attain civil rights can be argued was a means to gain votes. It can also be put forward that Kennedy was somewhat forced due to media coverage of protests such as those in Birmingham and the police brutality. Regardless, his actions and those of Lyndon carried forward after his untimely death helped develop Civil Right. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 granted Civil Rights for African Americans. It can be said that these president were only able to help to due to change in the social attitudes for example, at the start of the period emancipation proclamation introduced by Lincoln were rejected due to white Supremacist views. Whereas, the acts such as voting were accepted in 1965, suggesting that change in social attitudes lead to civil right act. In conclusion, the action of those presidents who did help was significant, without which no progress would have been made. The presidents who hindered facilitated and sustained institutional racism, those who were passive did nothing. Furthermore, it can be argued that Presidents helped only when social attitudes had changed enough for the majority of Americans to want civil rights for African Americans. Presidents reflected attitudes of the time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This uses many useful examples to discuss the question and retains its focus but the structure is too simplistic and so it can be difficult to follow the thread of the essay. Proof reading would have been useful.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 10/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the significance of the role of individuals in reducing racial discrimination in the ...

    5 star(s)

    able to advance as a race, and they need not be bound by the constraints of racial discrimination. This is why in the Long term Garvey was a valued activist, and his ideas were useful in progress in the movement towards equality.

  2. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    Rather his purpose was to wake up blacks to the need to love each other."30 This hatred of the white race did not only extend to the race as a whole, but also to minority groups.

  1. Attempts to enforce Prohibition in the USA were doomed to fail. How far do ...

    Another problem Prohibition acquired was the view of the public quickly changed, as obviously at first the majority of individuals had been in favour, but soon they grew tired of the government interfering with their private lives. Many more people found ways to obtain and drink alcohol, and subsequently it

  2. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    American population could afford these electrical appliances the supply rose with the apparent demand, but not only could most not afford them many did not even have electricity to power them. The 1920s saw a dramatic change in American Industry. The Ford motor company is one such example of this.

  1. To what extent was WW2 the most significant turning point for civil rights

    To some extent they did have success. The fair employment practises commission (FEPC) gained considerable power and forced many industries to desegregate, most notable the Philadelphia transport company. In 1944 the supreme court ruled in the Smith v Alwright case that the all white primaries of the democratic south were unconstitutional and must change.

  2. Does Abraham Lincoln deserve his reputation as one of the greatest of American presidents?

    the duties and imposts'; for his pledge to protect the government was registered in heaven. In this way a line was drawn, a warning issued." (Brognan 1999: pg 313) Lincoln made a promise that he would stand by the people, fight for their needs and protect their country under all circumstances.

  1. A Search for Identity in Bharati Mukherjee's The Holder of the World

    Ultimately Gabriel dies at sea,<(GET RID OF THE COMMA)and Hannah becomes the mistress of King Jadav Singh, a local Hindu Ruler. At the end of The Holder of the World Hannah returns to Salem, Massachusetts and lives with her long lost mother.

  2. To what extent was the impact of WW1 a key factor in the US ...

    Citizens felt immigrants were corroding the unity of the country: they also feared ?aliens? could easily betray America by being loyal to their home countries. The USA distrusted immigrants already living in America; the idea of allowing more in was considered outrageous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work