• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent had Catholic opposition to religious changes disappeared by 1640?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent had Catholic opposition to religious changes disappeared by 1640? The century heralding the break from Rome and ending with a King being despised, in part, for his Catholic tendencies saw enormous religious changes; and opposition to them from certain sections of society. The break with Rome marked the beginning of this religious turmoil. Smith argues there was Catholic opposition to this although it was not enormously significant; 'the great bulk of the population-the upper ranks of the clergy and the aristocracy and gentry-accepted the royal supremacy without difficulty'. Infamously, Thomas More opposed the break and John Fisher was the only opposing bishop but they were in the minority, motivated by their ideological beliefs. The break changed little outwardly; services continued as before, hence the small amount of opposition. The Pilgrimage of Grace in 1536 was admittedly in part a religious protest, or at least a protest under the guise of religion as the rebels wore badges of the Five Wounds of Christ and swore a contradictory oath to that of the Royal Supremacy, however it was motivated by other factors too. For example, the poor harvest of 1535, followed by another one in 1536 and the peacetime taxation being collected all contributed to the atmosphere of anger at the time, especially in the North where the revolt started. ...read more.


The arrival of Mary Queen of Scots in 1568 though meant the Catholics had a focus on which to build up opposition. The Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569 was the first overt challenge to Elizabeth and although according to Smith 'it had important political and economic motives', the revolt was predominantly meant to restore Catholicism; a fact highlighted by the restoration of Catholic services wherever the rebels went. The revolt resulted in England's further polarization from Rome in the form of the Papal Bull excommunicating Elizabeth in 1570. The Ridolfi plot of 1571 shows that Catholic opposition had become more blatant, and Ridolfi had even gone so far as to seek foreign support, although the Duke of Alva, with troops stationed in the Netherlands, never gave his support. The most significant outcome of the plot was Norfolk's execution, thereby the removal of arguably the most vociferous, powerful and active member of the Catholic faction. Hence, Catholic power and strength of opposition was seriously reduced. With the gradual disappearance of the Marian priests, it seemed as if Elizabeth's policy of assimilation was working. The arrival of missionary priests from Douai in 1574 however, resulted in a slight reverse in this trend. ...read more.


The hostility directed towards Catholics remained steadfast for a long space of time, for example it was not until 1829 that Catholics could become MPs, 1850 that they could build their own churches and yet the monarch or heir to the throne still cannot marry a Catholic. This is the legacy that the century of religious strife has left. By 1640 therefore, Catholic opposition was negligible. Plots had ended, foreign support had waned and the Catholic church had come to live peacefully with the Anglican Church. As many proved over the century, patriotism to their monarch and country had often proved a more potent force than that of religion. They were a tolerated and predominantly seigneurial religion but were surrounded by fear and mistrust. So, Dickens' referral to the 'residual Catholicism' left by the 1550s ignores the fact that there were significant number of Catholics left by the end of Elizabeth's reign, due perhaps, as Bossy argues, to the efforts of the missionary priests without which Catholicism may well have died out in the face of strengthening Anglicanism. However, these 40,000 Catholics constituted only a 'minority religion'. [Dures] As Smith writes 'The Catholic community in 1625 was not a serious threat either to the authority of the Established Church or to the integrity of the English nation state'. Sophia Money-Coutts 02/05/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. how significant was the catholic threat to elizabeth 1, posed by her roman catholic ...

    Although they were determined to disestablish Protestantism within England, in reality they never did. The seminary priests were a limited threat mainly due to the ease with which they were dealt with, but the potential threat they posed to Elizabeth was very real, due to their extreme views and willingness to martyrdom.

  2. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    Pearce, with Mike Cronin also pointing out his success; "Parnell was important to Ireland because he made the Home Rule movement a reality rather than an aspiration." Clearly, Charles Stewart Parnell enjoyed many successes however, it is important to consider his failures also.

  1. What Is The Truth About The Gunpowder Plot?

    So far, this is the possibility that fits best in to the story line. But I'm still not totally convinced as there are still small holes in it. For example: How would Cecil get Guy Fawkes to go down in to the cellar with some matches and a tinder box

  2. To what extent was Henry's decision to break with Rome influenced by Thomas Cranmer ...

    been able to propose or enact the policies which resulted in the break with Rome. In this way, Cranmer influenced the king's decision not with important ideas, but with his actions and loyalty to the cause of Henry and Anne.

  1. How influential was Dudley on the reign of Elizabeth 1st

    When Amy died a very suspicious death at the bottom of a flight of stairs in her secluded home Cumnor Place, all hopes Dudley may have held of becoming King were ended. The scandal created by her death alone meant that Amy had succeeded in death that which she could

  2. To what extent can the Revolt of 1381 be explained as a protest against ...

    The surviving serfs of the Black Death had had their expectations raised by the high level of mortality, much of which was amongst their own ranks. Due to the labour shortage caused by this mortality, many serfs now hoped for, and indeed expected higher wages and better conditions for themselves.

  1. To what extent was the burnings of Protestants the real cause of the failure ...

    opposite effect to their intention, a Protestant encouragement rather than a deterrent. Cross sums this up well with the following passage: "By 1555 those same citizens who had pressed to dip their handkerchiefs in Sir Thomas Wyatt's blood were now crowding round the stakes at Smithfield, shouting their encouragement to

  2. Why was there so much hostility towards Charles by 1640?

    The greatest, and most important right, was there Freedom of Speech. This meant that the Crown accepted that Members of Parliament had the right to discuss matters which affected the Commonwealth. These included things such as taxation, the Poor Law, the state of highways and Crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work