• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent had the Russian economy been successfully modernised by 1914? When examining the extent to which the Russian economy had been successfully modernised by 1914 one must consider change and continuity within the Russian economy between 1856 and 1914. It can be seen that Russia was a backward, agrarian economy in which the peasants were an exploited underclass on who the economy relied. There were some changes attempting to release the break on the economy, for example, Witte's Great Spurt, which fuelled industry, what he believed was the key to economic stability, and the emancipation which aimed to increase mobility of labour forces and incentives. Whilst this was a successful period in economic, and industrial growth within Russia that can be seen as a period of economic transition moving toward a modern industry, however, by 1914, Russia was ultimately unsuccessful compared to the western economies. Ultimately, the fact that the Tsar was fearful of social change, which would occur under industrial modernisation, and above all wished to maintain autocracy, meant that any economic modernisation was limited by this antiquated political system. ...read more.


This connection between the peasant and the commune can be seen through the fact that only 2.4% of the 17.8 million peasants in Russia set up individual farms outside the commune. Furthermore, these reforms were limited by the preparation for war in 1914. Stolypin also aimed to improve the efficiency of agriculture, which he believed, would allow the peasants to prosper. Success can be inferred from the urban peasants working in the factories who returned to the commune for harvest increasing their chance of education and prosperity. There was further success in the presence of a few prosperous peasants known as Kulaks, however, this prosperity was not widespread and therefore it can be seen that the economic situation remained fairly constant. Productivity only increased by 1% per annum whilst the population was increasing at a higher rate, and therefore yields remained fundamentally unchanged. Whilst Stolypin ended redemption payments and poll taxes in hope of enhancing prosperity, taxes were increased in other areas and the peasants remained exploited, and the economic growth was therefore limited. The government saw the key to economic development not only as allowing prosperity but, paradoxically, by controlling the peasants; the promise of freedom offered under the emancipation was not something that was delivered by the Tsar; the peasants remained exploited and controlled. ...read more.


Finally, when examining the modernisation of the finance of Russia, one can see that the creation of a command economy... etc. restrictive. 1. Finance Situ: who pays for modernisation - restrictive Command economy- run by state, The development of the 5 1960 State banks and 4 commercial banks, which aimed to provide capital for investment, were a huge step towards modernisation of the economy, as the financial infrastructure is essential in any prosperous, modern economy, and links into the coherent programme of industrialisation. In January 1897, the Russia currency was returned to the gold standard, which created a more stable economy and currency, therefore encouraging trade and investment. This meant that the state were directly involved in the finance of industry through investment and therefore in the economic growth of country. However, Witte has been criticised for making Russia too dependant on foreign loans; he gained loans from France, UK and Germany which held high taxes and interest rates within Russia. Over half of all investment into Russia was into oil, mining and banking, which creates development in industry but, as this is investment from western Europe, the profit went out of Russia and failed to support, stabilise and modernise its economy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. The British Raj has lasted many centuries and led to numerous transformations in the ...

    Transactions grew at a rapid rate and exports along increase five times (Charlesworth 48). By allowing world trade India became economically powerful. Although Britain's main purpose of world trade in India was mainly to profit from their deals, India benefited as well.

  2. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    While this report provided an outline of the problems Britain faced, it was by no means a clear guide to reform, for example, the Minister of Health, Bevan, had to "draw up plans for a comprehensive health service virtually from scratch."

  1. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    Under Gosplan power remained central and easy to control, however by spreading the power countrywide it was far harder to maintain a centrally controlled economy. Initially 'there was a feeling that Stalin had overreached himself in the five year plans statement which would have been true if Stalin had tried

  2. Assess to what extent was Louis XIVs foreign policy less successful after 1684.

    It would appear that the achievements of the latter half of Louis' reign did not match the first half. This is reflected in the French gains in terms of territory and gloire. While the former half of the reign was characterised by territorial acquisitions such as Franche-Comt�, Aire, Ypres, etc,

  1. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    The Petrograd Soviet was the strongest and also the closest threat facing the authority of the Provisional Government as the two bodies met in different wings of the same building, the Tauride Palace. Soon after its formation, the Soviet passed Soviet Order Number One on March 1st, which included instructions

  2. Examine the impact of the Great Famine on Irelands society, economy and politics

    They also left a long line of descendants which is now called the Irish diaspora which, according to Wikipedia, "contains over 80 million people, which is over thirteen times the population of the island of Ireland itself (6.11 million in 2007)"

  1. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    It is vital to recognise the colonial power Britain already held over certain areas of South Africa (particularly the Cape.) The disastrous 'Jameson Raid' of 1895, a fatuous uprising of Uitlanders, mainly comprised of British, lead by Dr Jameson (a good friend of Cecil Rhodes), left relations between the British and the Transvaal governments particularly strained.

  2. To What Extent Was Russia Modernised During the Personal Reign of Peter the Great? ...

    This lead to the nobility within the courts to also adopt westernised clothing as they believed it would please Peter. However this small reform was not adopted across the whole of Russia. The main reason for this was that Peter also adopted the western fashion of being clean shaven, the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work