• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent had the USSR recovered from the impact of the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) by the time of Stalins death in 1953?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent had the USSR recovered from the impact of the Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) by the time of Stalin?s death in 1953? After the Great Patriotic War of 1945, the state of the USSR had massively deteriorated due to suffering heavy losses as the consequences of war, its estimated in excess of 20 million troops were killed and two thirds of soviet industrial property had been destroyed. This dramatically impacts the USSR?s position economically, socially and politically. Hence after the war Stalin re-adopted his hard-line stance, and called for doubled efforts of the people in order to rebuild the strength of the USSR, full recovery became priority and resulted in serious hardship. Despite this society expressed patriotism after success in defeating Hitler, and engaged in mass support for Stalin as the figurehead of war, resulting in the period 1945-1953 being coined ?High Stalinism.? But the argument in hand is whether did the USSR actually recover prior to Stalin?s death, to its former pre-war ability, and i believe it predominantly did not, despite clear economical and industrial advances they?re impact on recovery are exaggerated and overplayed. The USSR emerged into a totalitarian state, oppressed with little gain and regression in social and political aspects, it did not fully recover until succession of Stalin. ...read more.


This resulted heavy intensive labour being the Stalinist methods resulting in serious hardship, the technique was inadequate and lead to lower productivity than what would potentially have been achieved if the structure was changed and more high tech machinery were to be introduced. The USSR also struggled more economically as they lost help provided during the war such as the American Land Lease policy which constituted some 23% of the total aid to the USSR during the war. Although heavy industry undoubtedly improved, light industry was neglected and agriculture suffered massively, resulting in the 1946-47 famine, collective farming disrupted production and led to lack of incentive, the countryside became depopulated and it scarcely brought return and all revenue was invested in industry whilst farming remained low, production in 1946 was one third amount of that in 1940, and in 1952 the 1940 figure was not even reached, this implies the economy was not as successful and expressed and furthermore has regressed in some areas rather than recovered. Politically, there was no recovery but purely regression, both on an international and domestic level. In 1945 Stalin during the war co-operated and built alliances in Europe with countries alike Britain, by 1953 these relations had vastly deteriorated and instead developed into fierce ...read more.


There was no investment in the people, no attempt to raise standard of living or reward efforts made, instead Stalin focused on the cold war and militarial build up. People were subjected to the cruelty of the gulags, even soldiers (Norman Lowe estimated 2.8m) as they were believed to have seen too much of western civilisation and therefore a threat to the state. People were forced into hysterical isolation, completely disconnected from the outside world and subject to constant threat and suspicion from the secret police led but the intimidating Beria. People had nothing, essentials were in scarce supply. People faced heavy intensive labour, and could not express discontent due to the probability of exile, they face heavy rations due to low grain production and religion was just tolerated, so long as it promoted Stalin. Also Zhdanov?s cultural reforms ensured intellects that would normally formulat public opinion followed directives from high, these are known as ?cultural reforms? There was no diversity, ambition, or opportunity, people were just the mechanism to bring economical wealth at the expense of their own standards of living. As expressed by Christopher Read society was ?rigid and cowed? this can be seen evidently in policies such as Russification being reintroduce to strengthen support in the state and Anti-Semitism resurfacing, you had to abide in the national cohesion despite no gain of communism over capitalism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    After men went to war there was a gap in the work force that needed to be filled. During World War II women were the most available to join the work force. Due to the discouragement to raise families during the Great Depression and the fact that most men of

  2. Assess the impact on the USSR of the Great Patriotic War

    Other social impact included the major movement of roles of women. With the large numbers of men draining into the Army, and the continued high demands for increased production in both factories and farms the worker vacancy had to be filled with women and children.

  1. To what extent did the USSR's victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941 ...

    Russians saw the war as a great national struggle, and many thought that the relaxation of Stalin's regime would continue after the war, and that it would even improve. These beliefs and the motivation for a better Russia led to the strong national unity and determination to win.

  2. "To What Extent Were Gorbachev's Policies the Catalyst to the Fall of the USSR?"

    Evaluation of sources- The first source to be considered is Mikhail Gorbachev's book "Perestroika: new thinking for our country and the world". This is a primary source, written directly by the mastermind behind the two most important policies implemented during the decade in the Soviet Union.

  1. To what extent had the USSR recovered from the impact of the Second World ...

    simply continued. There was a famine in 1946-47 and this caused widespread starvation, for example in Moldova alone 70,000 Russians died. Due to the famine, food rations were restricted and the numbers eligible for these were reduced (21 million reduced to 4.1 million).

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Amin Gemayel had been a leading candidate in pro-Syrian Muslim eyes, although he was also supported by the Israelis. Bashir was elected President against the wishes of the Syrians and Muslims. Amin however often declared that Israel's objective was to destroy Lebanon's role in the region.

  1. The events leading to the great patriotic war and the response of the Soviet ...

    "Her fate itself seems desirous of giving us a sign."iii Hitler's plan for Russia dictated Germany's overall strategy for the war. To secure his jumping-off point of into Russia, Poland, Hitler signed a nonaggression pact with the Soviets and agreed to give them eastern Poland and the Baltic's.

  2. The great Patriotic war - From incompetence to victory.

    The Nazi party and Hitler had open contempt for the Slavs. Hitler lumped them into the same category as the Jews: an inferior race and equated bolshevism with Zionism. He boasted of them being "vermin" and "subhuman" who were intended to serve the Aryan master race.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work