• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

To what extent is the oil crisis of 1973 a turning point in postwar economic development?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chin Ying Lin Olivia (2) 6L 07/02/2010 To what extent can the oil crisis of 1973-4 be regarded as a turning point in the development of the international economy? The 1973 oil crisis was an event when the members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) proclaimed an oil embargo in response to the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military during the Yom Kippur war and lasted until March 1974. In this essay, a "turning point" is defined to be a landmark- an event marking a unique or important historical change of course or one on which important developments depend. While acknowledging that the oil crisis certainly had dramatic and lasting impact on the development of the international economy: in terms of signifying the start of a worldwide shift in power away from the U.S for the first time, bringing about catastrophic repercussions on the international economy and also leading to the formation of the G-7 ; to regard it as a " turning point" would be an overstatement, due to the temporary nature of the crisis, as well as preceding events such as the collapse of the Bretton Woods System, and the continuity of dominance of the US in the global economy, albeit with lesser power than before the oil crisis. ...read more.

Middle

The Bretton Woods system was established in 1944 aimed at containing the contradictions of the world economy and preventing the development of socialist revolution; and was ever since the central foundation of the post-war international financial system. However, with the decline of US hegemony and increasing dissatisfaction with the privileged role of the U.S. dollar as the international currency, along with the weakening state of the dollar, the system was becoming almost impossible to maintain. Throughout the 1950s the US was still able to sustain a balance of payments deficit to finance loans, aid, and troops for allied regimes. However, during the 1960s, the costs of doing so became less tolerable. By the 1970s, the U.S. alarmingly held under 16% of international reserves. Adjustment to these changed realities was impeded by the U.S. commitment to fixed exchange rates and by the U.S. obligation to convert dollars into gold on demand. With increasing tolls on the Bretton Woods system, it finally collapsed after a last-gasp devaluation of the dollar to $44/ounce, and reopened in March in a floating currency regime. Its demise was thus a major turning point, one much crucial and significant than the 1973 oil crisis in the global economic development; as it inaugurated a new stage characterized by the development of globalized production and the domination of an international financial market- a watershed from the previous system that was pegged to the gold standard, and US-dominated. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1974, just a year after the oil crisis, the US came up with the 1974 Trade Act, which states that the US can redress any violation of US trade agreements, and retaliate against any foreign activity that restrict US trades. In 1981, it even insisted that Japan must put VRAs on automobile exports, an outright example of protectionist measures for self-interest. -this went on for a long span of 13 years before Japan retaliated and bypassed the VRAs, Given the fact that it was just a year after the oil crisis, and yet the US could still have the power to make impactful decisions that affected the global economy (in this case Japan) in the long-term, it clearly illustrates that US leadership had not waned throughout the years, and that the dominance of the US still prevailed. Conclusive, in view of the above counter-arguments, it appears that the 1973 oil crisis was a turning point for the development of the global economy. Yet, upon closer examinations, the event was still not exactly a crucial period for the world, keeping in mind that there existed other more important events like the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, and that US dominance still remained, although weakening. Therefore, the oil crisis was a turning point for the development of the global economy only to a small extent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is an extremely impressive response with excellent knowledge, detail and analysis. The author achieves good balance and reaches a conclusion but this could be more developed.

5 Stars

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 24/10/2014

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Asses the successes and failures of Mao's domestic policies between 1949 and 1976."

    5 star(s)

    Mao told students to form themselves into red guards. Children even accused their own parents of being anti communists. Schools and colleges were then closed, and lecturers were beaten for being anti-rightist when they did not mention Mao's name in their lectures. They Red guards destroyed factories, offices and local communist party offices.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How important was foreign intervention in the unification of Italy by 1870?

    4 star(s)

    part in the war in which she lost both battles she was involved in, but Prussia's victory in the war led to Italy's acquisition of Venetia from Austria. The final process of national unity in Italy was to occur during the Franco Prussian war in which France had to recall

  1. Mao Essay

    Chinese recorded history, more than thirty million people died throughout the duration of this famine.1314 This idea of Mao's while extremely unsuccessful, is a further demonstration of Mao using violence to elevate himself. The Cultural Revolution in China was Mao's way of regaining the power that he lost in the aftermath of the Great Leap Forward.

  2. Creative Writing - War.

    My hands were not untied. The first few months in captivity I spent sobbing and shouting. I hurled myself against the door on occasions. Nobody came to shut me up, only to take me to the toilet. Then, left me in silence, alone; 'You bastard Nips, come and fight me.'

  1. How did the Vietnam War Have an Impact on Canada

    This was a result of student activism in Canada, against the Vietnam War and in support of deserters, and extensive pressure by the New Democratic Party (NDP) at the time. This had affected Canada socially because it was the first time an activist group had influenced a decision made by the Canadian Government.

  2. To what extent was Collectivisation a success?

    Soon after, the problem of drought and famine arose; famine spread very fast killing millions of peasants - fewer than 7 million were said to have died. Starvation soon followed as thousands were condemned to this by requisitioning gangs, who left the requisitioned grain to rot, and made it unavailable to the hungry.

  1. Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

    because if the war was won by the central powers, the USA wont receive back the loans they gave to Britain and France before and at the time of the war. 1 Another tactical failure was the German U-boat Campaign, it was designed as a counter-blockade to the blockade Great Britain has on Germany.

  2. In What Ways Did World War One Impact American Society?

    Economically, the U.S.A benefited from the war in Europe. America sold food, munitions and medicine to Britain and the allies and this led to a boom in the economy. Financial aid and loans were also given to the belligerents. Agricultural prices boomed and farmers benefited due to the lack of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work