• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Chaing Kai-sheks leadership a failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Emma To what extent was Chaing Kai-shek?s leadership a failure? (Was the failure of the new GMD (nationalist) government inevitable?) It can be argued that Chaing Kai-shek?s leadership was always going to fail, because he was fighting a battle that could never be won. However, through his time in power, did also have many aims and successes, which helped china and the Chinese people. Chaing Kai-shek and the GMD?s aims were imposed to help make china a more stable country. They wanted to enforce Sun Yet Sen?s three principles of the people (nationalism, democracy and social reform). However, after Sun Yet Sen?s death in 1925, Kai-shek and the GMD (nationalists) ...read more.

Middle

Chaing Kai-Shek and the GMD, leadership were also clearly corrupted. This is most obviously shown in the way that they operated with foreigners. Kai-Shek knew that he could never completely rid china of foreigners and foreign trade. To deal with the matter he compromised and increased tax on trade in and out of china. In relation to this, progress had been made towards removing foreign dominance from china was undermined by the Japanese occupation of Manchuria that began in 1934. Kai-shek also wanted to liberate china away from the drug opium. However due to the money made from opium trade, Kai-Shek made opium illegal but also had a part in the marketing of opium to benefit from the income made. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kai-Shek had turned to coercion and authoritarianism in order to consolidate his power. In the years of 1934-1935 the GMD government had been powerless to prevent a widespread famine which caused the death of thirty million Chinese people, however many people believe that Kai-Shek did not acknowledge these deaths as important. Kai-Shek?s preoccupation with crushing his communist opponents had divided vital energies away from the structuring of an ordered civil society. In conclusion, to say the Chaing Kai-Shek and the GMD government were a complete failure is an unfair statement. The GMD/ Nationalist rule over China did have many successes that made China a stronger and more stable country. However, the fact that the GMD government had more failures than successes shows how weak and hypocritical Kai-Shek was. The GMD/ Nationalist government were never going to survive with Kai-Shek as their main ruler. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    The apparent success could be put down to fear and intimidation rather than genuine support or belief in collectivisation. In the end, collectivisation did lead to more efficient farming and increased production, but in the short term it involved Stalin in a 'war' with the kulaks, and a disastrous fall in output, which led to famine.

  2. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    This reluctance was seen by most Russians as an attempt by the bourgeois ministers to hang on to power and it cost the Provisional Government greatly as it made the task they faced harder by increasing the resentment and anger felt by the majority of the Russian people towards them.

  1. The First English Civil War

    The Lord Brooke, who commanded for Parliament in Warwickshire and Staffordshire and was looked on by many as Essex's eventual successor, was killed in besieging Lichfield Cathedral on 2 March, and, though the cathedral soon capitulated, Gell and Brereton were severely handled in the indecisive Battle of Hopton Heath near

  2. How has the nature of leadership changed over the period 1790-1945?

    It is also important that the role of leader has altered not only in practical terms, but also in the representations of the military effort of a country. In an era where conflicts have been so vast in their scale and devastation, particularly in the 20th century, the emphasis in

  1. How effective was the leadership provided by prominent individual nationalists in Malaya?

    Ibrahim's KMM did succeed in getting the Malay populace to know more about Kaum Muda (literally meaning Young Group), which attacked traditional religious customs such as the rote memorisation of texts. In this aspect, Ibrahim was successful in getting publicity towards his cause.

  2. Explain the successes of Calvin in Geneva

    In his 'Institutes" Calvin included his beliefs on issues such as sole fide (revealing his Lutheran influence) , double predestination, marriage, education, singing in public worship and the Lord's Supper. Calvin published his 'Institutes' at a turbulent time in Geneva, when there was no coherence, and so-called "reformers" spent their time preaching and smashing up Churches.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    Simultaneously in XI century the number of pilgrimages to the Holy Land had increased. " Infidel Turk "was portrayed as a barbarian, whose presence in the Holy Land is intolerable to God and man. In addition, the Seljuks created immediate threat to the Christian Byzantine Empire.

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    brother was a bishop and the feudal system gave the church a lot of power. When in control of the church, William was able to strike fear into his opponents through sermons. He would use these as messages to convey fear that if the Saxons rebelled against the king they would go to hell.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work