• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Chaing Kai-sheks leadership a failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Emma To what extent was Chaing Kai-shek?s leadership a failure? (Was the failure of the new GMD (nationalist) government inevitable?) It can be argued that Chaing Kai-shek?s leadership was always going to fail, because he was fighting a battle that could never be won. However, through his time in power, did also have many aims and successes, which helped china and the Chinese people. Chaing Kai-shek and the GMD?s aims were imposed to help make china a more stable country. They wanted to enforce Sun Yet Sen?s three principles of the people (nationalism, democracy and social reform). However, after Sun Yet Sen?s death in 1925, Kai-shek and the GMD (nationalists) ...read more.

Middle

Chaing Kai-Shek and the GMD, leadership were also clearly corrupted. This is most obviously shown in the way that they operated with foreigners. Kai-Shek knew that he could never completely rid china of foreigners and foreign trade. To deal with the matter he compromised and increased tax on trade in and out of china. In relation to this, progress had been made towards removing foreign dominance from china was undermined by the Japanese occupation of Manchuria that began in 1934. Kai-shek also wanted to liberate china away from the drug opium. However due to the money made from opium trade, Kai-Shek made opium illegal but also had a part in the marketing of opium to benefit from the income made. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kai-Shek had turned to coercion and authoritarianism in order to consolidate his power. In the years of 1934-1935 the GMD government had been powerless to prevent a widespread famine which caused the death of thirty million Chinese people, however many people believe that Kai-Shek did not acknowledge these deaths as important. Kai-Shek?s preoccupation with crushing his communist opponents had divided vital energies away from the structuring of an ordered civil society. In conclusion, to say the Chaing Kai-Shek and the GMD government were a complete failure is an unfair statement. The GMD/ Nationalist rule over China did have many successes that made China a stronger and more stable country. However, the fact that the GMD government had more failures than successes shows how weak and hypocritical Kai-Shek was. The GMD/ Nationalist government were never going to survive with Kai-Shek as their main ruler. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    The apparent success could be put down to fear and intimidation rather than genuine support or belief in collectivisation. In the end, collectivisation did lead to more efficient farming and increased production, but in the short term it involved Stalin in a 'war' with the kulaks, and a disastrous fall in output, which led to famine.

  2. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    or extreme decisions could cause the ordinary people of the country to question their legitimacy and rebel against their word. In relation to the issue of authenticity and legitimacy the government promised elections for a Constituent Assembly, however they continuously delayed them in the knowledge that if elections were ever held, then they would probably be replaced.

  1. How has the nature of leadership changed over the period 1790-1945?

    the remembrance and reconstruction of the conflict has been to capture the stories of the common soldier, who served so bravely for his country. The nature of warfare as defined by the massive volunteer armies has come to be most powerfully encapsulated in the memorials to the Unknown Soldier, rather than the any individual figure.

  2. How effective was the leadership provided by prominent individual nationalists in Malaya?

    Ibrahim's KMM did succeed in getting the Malay populace to know more about Kaum Muda (literally meaning Young Group), which attacked traditional religious customs such as the rote memorisation of texts. In this aspect, Ibrahim was successful in getting publicity towards his cause.

  1. Explain the successes of Calvin in Geneva

    It is for these reasons that Calvin was called to Geneva by Farel, who hoped Calvin, could provide discipline, and although he failed the first time around, the fact that he was called there once more in 1541 proves that the city's leaders believed his strict, structured, but coherent methods could provide peace, stability, and most importantly success in Geneva.

  2. The First English Civil War

    Hampden's advice was undoubtedly premature. A Sedan or Worcester was not within the power of the Parliamentarians of 1642. In Napoleon's words: "one only manoeuvres around a fixed point", and the city levies at that time were certainly not, vis-�-vis Rupert's cavalry, a fixed point.

  1. To what extent could the Crusades be described as failure within the years 1095-1195?

    younger sons of lords, especially in the north of France, could not expect to participate in the division of father's land. By taking part in the crusade, they could hope for lands and status in society, which had their oldest, more fortunate brothers.

  2. To What Extent Does History show that there is no such thing as absolute ...

    only chose him over Trotsky because he was a peasant and a ?people?s person?. In many ways, it seems that Stalin was closest to ruling with complete power, however it would mainly have been due to fear of opposing him due to his ruthlessness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work