• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Germany responsible for World War 1

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent where Germany responsible for WW1 The vast majority of the responsibility for the outbreak of world war in 1914 has to lie with Germany because of its aggressive foreign policy with Germany?s empirical ambitions, the use of War by timetable with the Schleiffen plan and the view amongst German politicians that war could solve their domestic problems. However the reasons as to why the First World War started generally fall into one of two main ideas. The first of these is the Fischer thesis, which puts the entirety of the blame onto Germany?s shoulders. The other main theory is the consensus theory that shares the blame between all the major world powers, and how they ?slithered over the brink into the boiling cauldron of fire.? The Fischer thesis of 1961 stated that Germany had gone to war to achieve European and worldwide domination and that Germany hoped that its ?blank cheque? to Austria in support of the evolving situation in the Balkans would result in war. ...read more.

Middle

This theory is supported by Erdmann who uses the diaries of Riezler which show that Germany had not been planning war. The theory follows from the July crisis of 1914 when Archduke Franz Ferdinand was shot and killed in Serbia. Austria sent their 14 demands to Serbia but required Germany to help them carry it out. Germany offered Austria the ?blank Cheque? to Austria. When Serbia refused to allow Austria all of their demands Austria declared war closely followed by Russia in support of their ally Serbia. Russian mobilisation caused the German army to initiate the Schieffen plan, pulling France into war as well. The Schlieffen plan involved going through Belgium so also dragged Britain into the war. The consensus theory is supported by the idea of encirclement which also undermines the Fischer thesis. Hildebrand, Hillbruger and Schollgen put forward the idea that German foreign policy between 1908 and 1914 was driven obsessively to break the encirclement of other allied countries, and that Germany?s reasons for going to war where purely defensive not offensive. ...read more.

Conclusion

For me the idea that the German war was a defensive operation cannot hold much sway because of the huge scope of the German plan and more importantly the Schlieffen plan and how it aimed to gain such vast swathes of land and knock out its major global competitors. This means that the Fischer thesis has a very strong case that German war was entirely for personal gain. With the German war plans giving Germany such massive international gains and the evidence from diaries and the German War Council of 1914 make it impossible to believe that Germany was not planning this war. The Wehler twist does however fill in a lot of holes with the Fischer thesis giving a more reasonable reason for Germany going to war. Overall the vast majority of the blame has to lie with Germany, with the evidence of Germany planning for the war because of the internal pressures of the SDP and the international gains it would bring. However other powers cannot be absolved of blame as the old saying goes, it takes two to tango. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How did the Holocaust happen, and who is responsible?

    In 1935 the Jews were forbidden to represent their country in the Army. Nuremberg laws were passed on the 15th of September, 1935 which stated Jewish people couldn't be citizens, only those whom had German blood. Germans and Jews were no longer allowed to have relationships, this level of interference

  2. Hitlers Germany

    of the Baltic States, he sacrificed them to the needs of his Italian and Russian alliances with indifference. So long as good relations with Poland were necessary to his foreign policy he showed little interest in Poland's German minority. But when it suited his purpose to make the 'intolerable wrongs'

  1. "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    This once again created more tension between the Great Powers of Europe. Austria-Hungary with the support of Germany presented an ultimatum to Serbia in order to withdraw her troops. Russia supported her "Slav brothers." But Russia saw herself incapable of achieving victory and withdrew.

  2. Vietnam war

    * Increasing centralisation, administrators replacing democratically elected village councils, purging of suspected communist/ Viet Cong activity. * Strategic Hamlet program= American support= Varyingly effective= greater discontent= 1960 suspension, but then new strategic hamlet program of relocation protected by ARVN= 3000 fortified villages by end of year.

  1. "The first world war was the result of long-standing rivalries between the great powers". ...

    Because there was little serious hostility between the majorities of European powers when occupying land, the scramble for Africa cannot be taken as a serious rivalry. The only significant rivalry was between France and Germany during the Moroccan crisis, the rivalry was already present and already a hostile one.

  2. To What Extent Was a War Between Nazism and Bolshevism Inevitable?

    As early as 27th July 1920 Hitler had openly asserted, "an alliance between Russia and Germany can only come about if the Jews are overthrown" 5. Eleven years later on 22nd July in talks with the Japanese military attach�, General Oshima, at Bayreuth he said that he wished to "once

  1. The extent to which Germany was responsible for world war one

    However when Britain ended its isolation first with Japan it wasn't because of the threat they faced from Germany but instead from Russia. In addition to this the second alliance they made with France was in order to protect its empire and was not aimed towards Germany either.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    in their rise to power and well after they had affirmed this power with the enabling act.[8] Tracing back to the original question at hand, perhaps you could place the argument that genocide can be traced back indefinitely with the savage rise of anti-Semitism throughout the 1930's gripping Germany in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work