• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Njeri Muhia Mr. Kizito History-Russia To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917? In 1917 Russia was in a very precarious place socially, economically and most prominently politically. It was in this same year that two revolutions took place, changing the political regime of Russia dramatically. Lenin was a major factor that contributed to the Bolshevik take over in late 1917. His decisive leadership, radical plans, as well as influence and power all were essential to the Bolshevik success, however other factors were key and integral parts of this as well, including the failures of the provisional government, involvement of Trotsky, and more. Therefore questioning how far Lenin was part of the Bolshevik take over. Lenin fore mostly, was an influential figure, his April Theses were radical, controversial but were the beginning of his widespread support by the Russians. He firstly stated that the Provisional government was to be overthrown and that Bolshevik take-over to be put in place. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the urgency in which Lenin led the Bolshevik attack helped the party evade road blocks that would have slowed their progression to power, such as the meeting of the All Russian Congress of Soviets, and the elections. Basically Lenin planning, scheming and the development of such a powerful party were key reasons as to why the Bolshevik party was able to take over in 1917 without much disruption and opposition. However, Lenin is not the only reason for this, it was half his tactic, and half the failures of the provisional government and its vulnerable position of the time. The interim government was quickly losing the support of the people for various reasons. One prominent cause of this was that they were still involved in a losing war that was damaging the economy and social welfare of Russia. The war also caused a division between the provisional government and the Petrograd Soviet, the soviet which had the support of most of the working class. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky managed to become a leader of the Military Revolutionary Committee and thus was able to organize, lead and mobilize the only effective military force in Petrograd. Trotsky also helped Lenin draft plans in overthrowing the Provisional government, enabling the Red Guards to go out and begin the Bolshevik take over. Without Trotsky, Lenin would not have had an inside eye and hand in Russia being capable of protecting the Bolshevik position and power in Petrograd. Lastly, because many other revolutionary had regarded the February revolution as the main revolution and had supported the Provisional government seeing as they had promised to uphold the interests of Russians, such as the Social Revolutionaries, had firstly, lost support of the population because of their support, and furthermore had no plans in uprising against the prominent Bolshevik power and presence. Therefore as much as Lenin and his leadership were real reasons in the success of the Bolsheviks in 1917, these other reasons contributed to the same. The take over of the Bolsheviks, was one that was tactical decisive, but also very lucky in terms of timing and place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    and one concerned with administration (provisions, supplies and military transport). The real power, though, lay with the war section of the Council of State, all decisions of which were made by Napoleon himself. * In the absolutist state which he created, Napoleon's resources for war were unrivalled in Europe.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    They had been producing a newspaper, Soldatskaya Pravda, especially for the soldiers for several months, and had recruited and agitated among the soldiers much more actively than any of the other parties. For this Lenin can take much credit. The April Theses had had an electrifying effect upon the most politically active of the soldiers and sailors.

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    Russia in 1904-05 had fought the Russo-Japanese war against the Japanese, and had suffered a humiliating defeat, especially as the Japanese at that time were considered to be very weak. The First World War had an immense similarity to that of the Russo-Japanese War and caused unrest in all sections of Russia's society.

  2. To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

    By the increase of Bolshevik members from 25,000 in February to 75,000 in April, it is clear that Lenin was performing as a very able leader for the Bolshevik party. Even with this huge increase of support, he still realised that this platform wasn't sufficient enough to perform a launch for power.

  1. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    Elections are postponed until the Constituent Assembly can meet. Its meeting is postponed until the fall. This is a tragic mistake. The authority of the government is severely limited by the Soviet, which is in direct competition with he government. If there was any doubt about this, it soon vanished when the Soviet issued the famous "Order No. 1."

  2. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    stations, telephone exchanges, post offices, the national bank and the Winter Palace in Petrograd. By the beginning of November, Moscow and the Kremlin had fallen to the Bolsheviks. Lenin now had the chance to make Russia a communist country. Before April 1917, Lenin was in exile in Serbia this meant

  1. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    Peasants all over the country flocked to cities in search of new, better jobs in industry. However, often all they found were poor jobs and exploitation by their employers. The population became more polarized between the working class and the rich employers, and many poorer people were attracted to the

  2. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    he have able to gain the support of the people or the means by which to seize power had it not been for the mistakes of the Provisional Government. The failures of the Provisional Government to deal with Russia?s social and economic problems, including their inability to end the war

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work