• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Njeri Muhia Mr. Kizito History-Russia To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917? In 1917 Russia was in a very precarious place socially, economically and most prominently politically. It was in this same year that two revolutions took place, changing the political regime of Russia dramatically. Lenin was a major factor that contributed to the Bolshevik take over in late 1917. His decisive leadership, radical plans, as well as influence and power all were essential to the Bolshevik success, however other factors were key and integral parts of this as well, including the failures of the provisional government, involvement of Trotsky, and more. Therefore questioning how far Lenin was part of the Bolshevik take over. Lenin fore mostly, was an influential figure, his April Theses were radical, controversial but were the beginning of his widespread support by the Russians. He firstly stated that the Provisional government was to be overthrown and that Bolshevik take-over to be put in place. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the urgency in which Lenin led the Bolshevik attack helped the party evade road blocks that would have slowed their progression to power, such as the meeting of the All Russian Congress of Soviets, and the elections. Basically Lenin planning, scheming and the development of such a powerful party were key reasons as to why the Bolshevik party was able to take over in 1917 without much disruption and opposition. However, Lenin is not the only reason for this, it was half his tactic, and half the failures of the provisional government and its vulnerable position of the time. The interim government was quickly losing the support of the people for various reasons. One prominent cause of this was that they were still involved in a losing war that was damaging the economy and social welfare of Russia. The war also caused a division between the provisional government and the Petrograd Soviet, the soviet which had the support of most of the working class. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky managed to become a leader of the Military Revolutionary Committee and thus was able to organize, lead and mobilize the only effective military force in Petrograd. Trotsky also helped Lenin draft plans in overthrowing the Provisional government, enabling the Red Guards to go out and begin the Bolshevik take over. Without Trotsky, Lenin would not have had an inside eye and hand in Russia being capable of protecting the Bolshevik position and power in Petrograd. Lastly, because many other revolutionary had regarded the February revolution as the main revolution and had supported the Provisional government seeing as they had promised to uphold the interests of Russians, such as the Social Revolutionaries, had firstly, lost support of the population because of their support, and furthermore had no plans in uprising against the prominent Bolshevik power and presence. Therefore as much as Lenin and his leadership were real reasons in the success of the Bolsheviks in 1917, these other reasons contributed to the same. The take over of the Bolsheviks, was one that was tactical decisive, but also very lucky in terms of timing and place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    They point out that he was in no way an innovator. He made no significant contribution to tactics, introduced no new weapons and was not open to new ideas. His contributions to strategy were not original. * The armies he commanded were taken over from the Revolution, the levee en masse was established before he came to power.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    This proved crucial during the reactionary Kornilov revolt when Kerensky who could not rely on the loyalty of the Petrograd Garrison in face of an army putsch had no alternative but to call upon the support of Lenin and his Red Guards.

  1. To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

    treaties amongst nations - Lenin realised that not all nations were ready to negotiate peace, therefore, he cleverly negotiated directly with the Central Powers, and in doing so, he aligned the Bolsheviks with the trend of opinion in Petrograd. In contrast with this, the Provisional Government began to lose favour

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    The Bolsheviks based most of their politics on the sociological ideas of Karl Marx, and believed that, before the revolution, Russia had been in Marxism's 'feudal' period. This meant that the February revolution had been a capitalist revolution by the bourgeoisie (middle-class).

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    A further 100,000 men were garrisoned in and around Moscow, and 32,000 soldiers and sailors were stationed at Kronstadt. For the most part the men of the garrisons were either over or under age, or else recovering from wounds. They were mostly peasant in background and thus many of them

  2. The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

    Kerensky had left the city in a car lent to him by the American Embassy and did not return as the troops at the front would not help him either. Lenin had won due to his leadership, oratory skills and his determined personality and he would use theses again in the same way to cling on to power in Russia.

  1. To what extent did Lenin's legacy leave the Bolshevik party in a vibrant and ...

    Therefore the constuent assembly results of November 1917 left Lenin with an immediate problem as the Bolsheviks had only won a quarter of the seats. Lenin had always originally supported the idea of a Constitent Assembly as it followed Bolshevik beliefs as a democratic, peoples party wanting eveyone to have a voice in the running of Russia.

  2. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    However, it must be noted that Lenin only returned to Russia after the February Revolution, as he had been in exile. Therefore, the fall of the Tsarist regime and the Provisional Government taking power were necessary prerequisites for the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work