• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Njeri Muhia Mr. Kizito History-Russia To what extent was Lenin the key to the Bolshevik success of 1917? In 1917 Russia was in a very precarious place socially, economically and most prominently politically. It was in this same year that two revolutions took place, changing the political regime of Russia dramatically. Lenin was a major factor that contributed to the Bolshevik take over in late 1917. His decisive leadership, radical plans, as well as influence and power all were essential to the Bolshevik success, however other factors were key and integral parts of this as well, including the failures of the provisional government, involvement of Trotsky, and more. Therefore questioning how far Lenin was part of the Bolshevik take over. Lenin fore mostly, was an influential figure, his April Theses were radical, controversial but were the beginning of his widespread support by the Russians. He firstly stated that the Provisional government was to be overthrown and that Bolshevik take-over to be put in place. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, the urgency in which Lenin led the Bolshevik attack helped the party evade road blocks that would have slowed their progression to power, such as the meeting of the All Russian Congress of Soviets, and the elections. Basically Lenin planning, scheming and the development of such a powerful party were key reasons as to why the Bolshevik party was able to take over in 1917 without much disruption and opposition. However, Lenin is not the only reason for this, it was half his tactic, and half the failures of the provisional government and its vulnerable position of the time. The interim government was quickly losing the support of the people for various reasons. One prominent cause of this was that they were still involved in a losing war that was damaging the economy and social welfare of Russia. The war also caused a division between the provisional government and the Petrograd Soviet, the soviet which had the support of most of the working class. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky managed to become a leader of the Military Revolutionary Committee and thus was able to organize, lead and mobilize the only effective military force in Petrograd. Trotsky also helped Lenin draft plans in overthrowing the Provisional government, enabling the Red Guards to go out and begin the Bolshevik take over. Without Trotsky, Lenin would not have had an inside eye and hand in Russia being capable of protecting the Bolshevik position and power in Petrograd. Lastly, because many other revolutionary had regarded the February revolution as the main revolution and had supported the Provisional government seeing as they had promised to uphold the interests of Russians, such as the Social Revolutionaries, had firstly, lost support of the population because of their support, and furthermore had no plans in uprising against the prominent Bolshevik power and presence. Therefore as much as Lenin and his leadership were real reasons in the success of the Bolsheviks in 1917, these other reasons contributed to the same. The take over of the Bolsheviks, was one that was tactical decisive, but also very lucky in terms of timing and place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    They were a break with eighteenth-century tradition, and confusing to the opposition. * Given his hold over his men and the incapacity of his enemies to match him and his army, his victories multiplied rapidly. * If his career had finished in 1807, then Napoleon would have been considered one of the most undisputed great generals.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    The loyalty of the soldiers to the Bolsheviks was by now so intense that it is difficult to imagine how it could have been won away from them. In local elections held in September in Moscow, for example, the Bolsheviks won 83% of the garrison vote, as opposed to only 51% of the civilian vote.

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    Russia in 1904-05 had fought the Russo-Japanese war against the Japanese, and had suffered a humiliating defeat, especially as the Japanese at that time were considered to be very weak. The First World War had an immense similarity to that of the Russo-Japanese War and caused unrest in all sections of Russia's society.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    In February 1917 (old style calendar) the Russian Tsarist Empire came to an end as a result of civil unrest in Petrograd during what is known as the February Revolution. A Provisional Government was formed from the Tsarist Duma to act as a 'caretaker' government until a proper democracy could be established after the war.

  1. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    For this reason the working class were happy to self-sacrifice in order for the Bolsheviks to be built up and the overthrow the government. This was important as it gave the Bolshevik party mass support, a class to aim at but also use, for fighting if neccesary, to get what they wanted.

  2. To what extent did Lenin's legacy leave the Bolshevik party in a vibrant and ...

    In January 1918 the Constiuent Assembly was dissolved at gun point by the Red Guard. Surely this action was not democratic and was taking the Bolshevik party away from democracy and closer to dictatorship. Lenin justified his action always saying that 'To hand over power to the Constituent Assembly would again be compromising with the malignant bourgeoisie.'

  1. To what extent was Lenin's leadership the main reason for Bolshevik success in 1917?

    By the increase of Bolshevik members from 25,000 in February to 75,000 in April, it is clear that Lenin was performing as a very able leader for the Bolshevik party. Even with this huge increase of support, he still realised that this platform wasn't sufficient enough to perform a launch for power.

  2. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    Lenin promised ?peace, bread and land?, exploiting the mistakes of the Provisional Government and gaining the support of those most dissatisfied with their rule. Lenin also declared ?all power to the soviets?; he knew that the industrial workers, who wanted a constitutional assembly, had driven the February Revolution, and without

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work