• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state before 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History To what extent was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state before 1939? Although the Nazi state appeared to be an efficient and organised totalitarian government, they were only successful in controlling some aspects of German life, they were never in complete control of the country, greatly due to their lack of organisation and efficiency. They were not completely effective in controlling opposition either, which grew with time. The Nazi government seemed to be a totalitarian state in complete control of Germany; they tried to control all aspects of German life and were quite successful in a few occasions. They imposed fear and crushed opposition with a huge police force, the SS and the Gestapo, a secret police force. All political parties, except for the Nazi party, were banned and many political opponents were persecuted and murdered. They tried to have power over Germany's education system by rewriting schoolbooks to fit Nazi theories and closely watching teachers and professors. German boys had to join the Hitler youth and girls had to join the league of German maidens and so Nazis could control youth. ...read more.

Middle

The Catholic Church was in agreement with the Nazis at first, but around 1937 they became disillusioned with them, there were many leaders who openly criticised Nazi dictatorship, and when they protested against Hitler's Euthanasia campaign, Hitler publicly ordered it to stop. The Catholics were also very critical of Hitler's persecution of Jews. I don't think that the Nazi state was a fully successful totalitarian state because I believe in the structuralist argument that their system of government was actually quite chaotic. Hitler was not in complete control of the government, according to his assistants, he was easily bored with paperwork, he hated making decisions and refused to most of the time, and he had extremely short working hours. It is suggested that he was quite happy in allowing organisations to make independent decisions and create policies they assumed he would approve of, and only stopping some, once in a while if they became unpopular. When the Nazi's came into power, the existing government organisations of the civil service didn't leave power, they were supposed to be controlled and supervised by a variety of Nazi party bodies, but ministers, such as von Krosigk and Schacht managed to preserve traditions of their departments. ...read more.

Conclusion

There was quite a lot of underground resistance; working class groups produced anti government leaflets, people sabotaged factories, railways and army depots, some refused to join the party or contribute to Nazi funds and members of banned political parties continued to meet in secret. Some people like pastors Grueber and Zwanziger helped Jews. A lot of people were very happy with Hitler and felt no need to oppose him, Nazis were very concerned about pleasing important groups in society and did moderate policies to satisfy the general public, in 1938 there was widespread disapproval of the persecution of Jews. The government succumbed in a way, they continued to persecute Jews but kept it secret. The most successful aspect of the Nazi rule was probably the propaganda, which led people to believe that Hitler was in complete control of Germany and that the Nazi government was organised, effective and in full power over the lives of everyone in Germany. This is only true to a certain extent; the government was far from organised and effective and it never managed to fully control local governments who followed policies they wished to, and they were not completely successful in controlling the old government hierarchies and resistance from people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The Soviets thereupon declared that they were not at war with Finland at all. Western sympathy for the Finns mounted as they successfully resisted the Reds. In 1939 the Soviet Union was expelled from the League of Nations. Britain and France, observing the apparent weakness of the Red Army, debated

  2. Evaluate the Nazis economic policies from 1933 - 1939. To what extent were the ...

    Besides increasing job opportunities, emphasis was put in both controlling the labor market and improving working condition and the working class status too. Some people might rise up this question - How could Nazi government sponsor that many constructions and programs when the government was still in deficit?

  1. Life in Nazi Germany, 1933-1945

    Source C demonstrates this failure when Karma was told she was 'always an outsider', which was what volksgemeinschaft aimed to destroy. Overall, three of the sources tend to portray Nazi youth policies as unsuccessful policies, but I believe that the sources should be examined on what the definition on Nazi youth policy success is.

  2. To what extent did Hitlers Policies attract working class support between 1933 and 1939?

    However "nominal hourly wages in 1933 were 97 per cent of...1932"5 and in this regard the 'miracle' was not realized in tangible economic terms. Therefore as early as 1935 SOPADE reported economic uncertainty placed "great strain on the mental strength".6 The SOPADE reports naturally contained a sentiment opposed to the regime as an extension of their political endeavors.

  1. The government of the Nazi state was chaotic and lacked coherence in the years ...

    government in which an individual or group had absolute control, whereas 'Anarchy' would refer to a lack of government, suggesting that the government system could not exist without being completely redefined, further reflecting the idea that it was chaotic. Overall it suggests how the Nazi state was chaotic but didn't

  2. Soviet State

    By 1936 collectivisation was effectively complete, and rural capitalism had been destroyed. * As a result of collectivisation, the 25 million small peasant farms of the 1920's had been replaced by three new institutions: collective farms, state farms, and machine tractor stations.

  1. 'Was Germany a totalitarian state'?

    This group would, in Hitler's opinion be the most talented as they would have outwitted all their opponents. For this reason Hitler had four offices that claimed to represent him, all of which fought for his attention and approval. This unusual system of administration led to an unusual structure of individual power blocks, all fighting for superiority.

  2. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    In this way, he can, to some extent, be accused of being autocratic, but not negligent. When Neville Chamberlain became Prime Minister in 1937, he faced the task of dealing with many problems. He faced problems from Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy and Japan.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work