• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent was the Idea of 'Lebensraum' the Main War Aim of Hitler's Military Conquest?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent was the Idea of 'Lebensraum' the Main War Aim of Hitler's Military Conquest? When Hitler, as the leader of the Nazis, came to power in 1933 he set about preparing the country to go to war and invade neighbouring countries in order to acquire new lands and create a new German empire. Richard J Evans claims that "the ultimate goal of the war, he told them, not for the first time, was the creation of 'living space' in the East"1; this clearly shows that Evans believes this to be the principal aim of the Nazi conquests, as he maintains this to be Hitler's opinion. Other historians, however, offer a range of opinions on this issue, some arguing that is was in fact other factors that were the main driving force behind the Nazi's actions. Lebensraum was one of Hitler's policies which came to form in conjunction with the idea of Social Darwinism. This was the belief in 'survival of the fittest' within races through evolution, and that the German race was the furthest that the human race could evolve. Hitler wanted to expand eastwards into Eastern Europe and Russia to provide more living space for the German people who would move there and populate the area, and therefore ridding the world of the racial pollution that was the Slavs and Russians. ...read more.

Middle

The Treaty also meant Germany lost a lot of territory, but this will be discussed as a separate factor as it an external condition. The acceptance of War Guilt, the drastic restrictions on the size of their army, and the reparations they had to pay to the allies causing rapid inflation, worsened by the Wall Street Crash of 1929, humiliated Germany and left them in a very vulnerable position. Fritz Fischer agrees with this when he states that "a constant aim of the German governments had been, to effect, a revision of the Versailles settlement9". One way that Germany could repudiate the terms of the treaty could be to wipe out the allies who enforced it, and the obvious support of the renunciation of the treaty that Fischer discusses would prove to back up that Hitler would have received a lot of support for doing this. Fischer also says that all Governments had this as an aim, therefore showing that most Germans, no matter which political party they belonged to (which was such an important part of a German's everyday life) would have supported this reasoning. It is important however to notice that Fisher is of German origin and therefore is very possibly biased in his attitudes towards his nation's history, trying to talk down the discussion of the Jewish genocide. ...read more.

Conclusion

Again this suggests that the unification of German speakers and the repossession of their lost territories is in fact a measure towards the success of the Lebensraum plan, and therefore not the main War aim. From this evidence I feel I can derive that the other options I suggested, destruction of Jewish Bolshevism; repealing the terms of the Versailles Treaty; regaining lost territories and Bismarck era pride, were all in fact steps towards achieving the overall mission of Lebensraum. Richard J Evans sums this up well when he says that "[German] foreign policy was no longer conducted between states, but between races"17. This implies that the Nazis imperial aims were not in fact against specific nations, but against racial denominations, hence why Hitler discusses the destruction of Russia as the result of the annihilation of Jewish Bolshevism, not that his objective was simply to destroy Russia. General Friedrich von Bernhardi's book was incredibly influential on the Nazi movement, stating that "War is a biological necessity"18, this essentially captured the main reasoning behind the Nazi offensive action against other nations. Therefore I feel I can safely conclude that it was in fact Lebensraum that was Hitler's main war aim. His obsession that the Germans should conquer land in order to provide living space for their grand, new Empire of superior beings was the overall purpose of the Nazi movement as we have seen from the evidence given by separate Historians, and Hitler himself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    However, what actually remains of Bismarck's Germany today? Geographically, the great German Empire stretching from Kļæ½nigsberg in the east to Alsace-Lorraine in the west is hardly as vast today as it was before 1914, due to so much having been given up due to the first and second world wars.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * In December 1924 Stalin adopted the policy of 'Socialism in One Country' He argued that Russia could achieve socialism without the aid of revolution in other countries. * Trotsky saw industrialisation as less important than spreading the revolution. He wanted 'Permanent Revolution'.

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    outside working time Peasants/Small farmers Lowest paid in Germany Import controls and a setting of higher farm prices = relief Propaganda portrayed farmers as the backbone of the nation - # farmers decreased after 1933 as people left countryside to earn higher wages in towns Business Interests Big business made

  2. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Henig supports the fact that the Madagascar plan was still the Nazis main plan in terms of dealing with the Jews by citing a diary entry by Goebbels on 17th April 1940 where he states that the Nazis are still intent on shipping the Jews to Madagascar.

  1. Vietnam war

    Despite being advised to call up reserves and expand the war, he initiated what was to be the de-escalation of American involvement. The Tet inquiry revealed: 'There can be no assurance that... additional deployment would leave us... in any more favourable military position.'.

  2. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    Versailles can hence be seen as a necessity in controlling the overly ambitious Germans. Therefore passage A is invalid by arguing that Versailles destroying the German pride was the cause of conflict as Germans needed to be weakened or they would have created more problems if left to their own devices.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Beginning in 1928, the "Great Coalition," which included the left-wing Social Democrats and the conservative People's Party (DVP), had governed Germany. This unlikely combination worked largely because of the economic recovery and the political acumen of the DVP leader Gustav Stresemann, the primary architect of Germany's progress between 1924 and 1929.

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Don't think you can fight racial tuberculosis without taking care to rid the nation of the carrier of that racial tuberculosis. This Jewish contamination will not subside, this poisoning of the nation will not end, until the carrier himself, the Jew, has been banished from our midst.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work