• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent was the Idea of 'Lebensraum' the Main War Aim of Hitler's Military Conquest?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent was the Idea of 'Lebensraum' the Main War Aim of Hitler's Military Conquest? When Hitler, as the leader of the Nazis, came to power in 1933 he set about preparing the country to go to war and invade neighbouring countries in order to acquire new lands and create a new German empire. Richard J Evans claims that "the ultimate goal of the war, he told them, not for the first time, was the creation of 'living space' in the East"1; this clearly shows that Evans believes this to be the principal aim of the Nazi conquests, as he maintains this to be Hitler's opinion. Other historians, however, offer a range of opinions on this issue, some arguing that is was in fact other factors that were the main driving force behind the Nazi's actions. Lebensraum was one of Hitler's policies which came to form in conjunction with the idea of Social Darwinism. This was the belief in 'survival of the fittest' within races through evolution, and that the German race was the furthest that the human race could evolve. Hitler wanted to expand eastwards into Eastern Europe and Russia to provide more living space for the German people who would move there and populate the area, and therefore ridding the world of the racial pollution that was the Slavs and Russians. ...read more.


The Treaty also meant Germany lost a lot of territory, but this will be discussed as a separate factor as it an external condition. The acceptance of War Guilt, the drastic restrictions on the size of their army, and the reparations they had to pay to the allies causing rapid inflation, worsened by the Wall Street Crash of 1929, humiliated Germany and left them in a very vulnerable position. Fritz Fischer agrees with this when he states that "a constant aim of the German governments had been, to effect, a revision of the Versailles settlement9". One way that Germany could repudiate the terms of the treaty could be to wipe out the allies who enforced it, and the obvious support of the renunciation of the treaty that Fischer discusses would prove to back up that Hitler would have received a lot of support for doing this. Fischer also says that all Governments had this as an aim, therefore showing that most Germans, no matter which political party they belonged to (which was such an important part of a German's everyday life) would have supported this reasoning. It is important however to notice that Fisher is of German origin and therefore is very possibly biased in his attitudes towards his nation's history, trying to talk down the discussion of the Jewish genocide. ...read more.


Again this suggests that the unification of German speakers and the repossession of their lost territories is in fact a measure towards the success of the Lebensraum plan, and therefore not the main War aim. From this evidence I feel I can derive that the other options I suggested, destruction of Jewish Bolshevism; repealing the terms of the Versailles Treaty; regaining lost territories and Bismarck era pride, were all in fact steps towards achieving the overall mission of Lebensraum. Richard J Evans sums this up well when he says that "[German] foreign policy was no longer conducted between states, but between races"17. This implies that the Nazis imperial aims were not in fact against specific nations, but against racial denominations, hence why Hitler discusses the destruction of Russia as the result of the annihilation of Jewish Bolshevism, not that his objective was simply to destroy Russia. General Friedrich von Bernhardi's book was incredibly influential on the Nazi movement, stating that "War is a biological necessity"18, this essentially captured the main reasoning behind the Nazi offensive action against other nations. Therefore I feel I can safely conclude that it was in fact Lebensraum that was Hitler's main war aim. His obsession that the Germans should conquer land in order to provide living space for their grand, new Empire of superior beings was the overall purpose of the Nazi movement as we have seen from the evidence given by separate Historians, and Hitler himself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    He wanted 'Permanent Revolution'. * 1925 Party Congress: Stalin had many supporters at the congress as a result of his position as General Secretary. Kamenev was the Chairman of the Moscow branch of the Party, and Zinoviev of the Leningrad branch. All votes went against Trotsky. He lost his position as Commissar for War.

  2. Assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly a result of a long term ...

    war which reinforces the idea that the unique conditions of war influenced an important progression in the mindset of Nazi planners. As early as May 1940, Himmler was discussing the possibility of extending the "killing operations" of the Einsatzgruppen into genocide, but at this time regarded deportation as the "mildest and best if one rejects...physical extermination of a people...

  1. The Rise and Fall of Adolf Hitler.

    poem Bursts into flame, and the heart's engine Takes on the load of these broken years and lifts it. I am not even the tongue and the hand that write The dissolving sweetness of a personal view Like those who now in greater luck and liberty Are professionally pitiful or heroic.

  2. "The most important aim of foreign policy 1933-1936 was to overthrow the terms of ...

    war against the Nazis and it meant that the Germans did not have fight a war on two separate fronts. However, what made it contentious was the fact of the secret agreement between the two nations that they would both invade Poland and that each nation would get half each

  1. To what extent was Bismarck responsible for German unification?

    What legacy however, does Bismarck's work and character leave behind? The character of Bismarck clearly helped form the Germany of the beginning of the twentieth century, but how much of this was purely Bismarck and purely Prussia is open to debate.

  2. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    The Nazis also encouraged the boycott of Jewish shops on 1st April 1933, clearly trying to segregate the Jews from the rest of the German public. However, Henig does highlight that the violence towards the Jews depended on the strength of the Nazi regime in the area.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    This speech was delivered as a means of propaganda therefore should not be interpreted as a trustworthy blueprint for genocide; the bulk of Nazi propaganda existed only to intensify the public?s belief, support and commitment to the government?s policies. Hitler himself wrote ?the art of propaganda consists precisely in being

  2. Assess the short-term significance of the Treaty of Versailles.

    In other words, Hitler and Germany only built up a huge armed force in protest to Versailles. They only did it because Versailles stated that they could not. Similarly, the Treaty of Versailles could then be behind the Anschluss. The only reason perhaps Hitler annexed Austria was because what was agreed in 1919 said he was not allowed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work