• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

US involvement in South Vietnam - source related study

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study source A "What can you learn from source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?" It is apparent from source A that America was involved in Vietnam to maintain capitalism and to suppress communism. The writer of the source, John F Kennedy, had a high position in the US government and he makes the point that the Americans did not like communism and wanted to stop it spreading. "If the red tide of communism overflowed into Vietnam, then Burma, Thailand...and Cambodia would be threatened." This shows the Americans definitely knew that if they did not step in and support the Vietnamese, the Domino theory would occur. This theory stated that if one country fell to communism, so would the surrounding countries, like dominoes set up in a line and pushed over. The use of "red tide" gives the impression of communism washing away the freedom of the Vietnamese, and the surrounding countries. The tide can also have a very destructive nature and using this to describe communism shows that it will erode the freedom of the ordinary people and destroy their freedom. Study sources A, B and C "Do sources B and C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?" ...read more.

Middle

This shows the people the Government were covering up what was going on. This would have annoyed the American public and made them angry at the Government for lying to them for so long. Through this article the American public would have discovered that they were fighting the war using dirty tactics. Source F is a letter written home to a family member or a girlfriend or friend, by a soldier fighting for his country in 1969, telling them about the horrors of war. Because it is written, presumably to someone he trusts, he does not lie and cover up the nasty details. He gives a truthful account. He tells the receiver that the war is a waste of young life and words such as "tragic" evoke feelings of sadness in the reader. The way he writes, "I'm sick of facing everyday a new bunch of kids getting ripped to pieces," shows the war is futile and they are never going to win. This letter would change the public opinion because the receiver would tell their friends about what they had been told and they would tell their friends and so on, and the news would spread quickly of the bad things happening to the countries men out in Vietnam. ...read more.

Conclusion

The viewers saw what their superiors and equals thought and began to fell that if that's how that person feels that they should feel the same as well. One of the most famous and impacting quotes made on television was when Walter Cronkite said on live broadcast "What the hell is going on? I thought we were winning this war." Mr Average American had lost faith in the war and live on television. The American public saw it and would have begun to loose faith too. Source D tells us about a public vote that showed how 64% of people who had watched the war on television had said "television made them feel like backing up the boys in Vietnam." This shows that watching the war changed people attitudes about the conflict for the better and made them want to back up the men fighting for the freedom of the Vietnamese peasants, instead of making them feel that they ought to back up the men fighting simply because it was their husbands and fathers and brothers fighting out there. Many commentators have said that television lost the Vietnam War for America - as the full horror of conflict was beamed into people's homes public support diminished. The media coverage on television was bold and aggressive and turned the ordinary Americans against the war. Amie Derricott candidate number: 0231 centre number: 24100 Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    He was the youngest ever President and so he played on his youthfulness, he appealed to the younger generation. Caputo says that young men were persuaded to go to war "by Kennedy's challenge to 'ask what you can do for your country'.

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    Ireland would have its own parliament in Dublin, autonomous of the British, while the two kingdoms would remain united under the British-Irish monarch. Now, we should look around somewhere else, apart from Europe and before we investigate the two countries that play the biggest role in terrorism and the war against terrorism.

  1. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    conclusion that women in Vietnam did play a role in the war. C) Study Sources H, J and I. Is there enough evidence in these sources to give us a reliable image of United States troops at war in Vietnam?

  2. Disadvantages of Capitalism.

    The English also established a form of capitalism. During this same time Africans were seized from their native lands and were shipped to America involuntarily in the form of property, to be used as slave labor. Also, phase one brought an era in which Irish Catholics immigrated to America, driven

  1. What can you learn form Source A about Anthony Eden's reasons for opposing Colonel ...

    If this is anything to go by, the majority of the British public wanted peace rather than war with Egypt. Source F gives the same impression but with a different approach. It is more to do with the reasons for going to war.

  2. The Home Front - source related study

    Source B agrees with Source C as it shows that the women cared for their friends who were lying ill on the stones outside the workshop. It states that the women knew each other well which implies that they were talking outside working hours, so they had a social life.

  1. Hitler - Source related study.

    In source C it says "It is necessary, then, for better or for worse to resort to war" This to me shows that this man also wants to go to war. But the man who wrote this was Adolf Hitler.

  2. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    This was meant to convince the peasants not to help the Vietcong as they had no choice but to resettle in villages away from the Vietcong controlled areas. So then the Americans and ARVN could isolate guerrillas. In the process of going into villages, they would shoot cows and bur all the rice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work