• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

US involvement in South Vietnam - source related study

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study source A "What can you learn from source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?" It is apparent from source A that America was involved in Vietnam to maintain capitalism and to suppress communism. The writer of the source, John F Kennedy, had a high position in the US government and he makes the point that the Americans did not like communism and wanted to stop it spreading. "If the red tide of communism overflowed into Vietnam, then Burma, Thailand...and Cambodia would be threatened." This shows the Americans definitely knew that if they did not step in and support the Vietnamese, the Domino theory would occur. This theory stated that if one country fell to communism, so would the surrounding countries, like dominoes set up in a line and pushed over. The use of "red tide" gives the impression of communism washing away the freedom of the Vietnamese, and the surrounding countries. The tide can also have a very destructive nature and using this to describe communism shows that it will erode the freedom of the ordinary people and destroy their freedom. Study sources A, B and C "Do sources B and C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?" ...read more.

Middle

This shows the people the Government were covering up what was going on. This would have annoyed the American public and made them angry at the Government for lying to them for so long. Through this article the American public would have discovered that they were fighting the war using dirty tactics. Source F is a letter written home to a family member or a girlfriend or friend, by a soldier fighting for his country in 1969, telling them about the horrors of war. Because it is written, presumably to someone he trusts, he does not lie and cover up the nasty details. He gives a truthful account. He tells the receiver that the war is a waste of young life and words such as "tragic" evoke feelings of sadness in the reader. The way he writes, "I'm sick of facing everyday a new bunch of kids getting ripped to pieces," shows the war is futile and they are never going to win. This letter would change the public opinion because the receiver would tell their friends about what they had been told and they would tell their friends and so on, and the news would spread quickly of the bad things happening to the countries men out in Vietnam. ...read more.

Conclusion

The viewers saw what their superiors and equals thought and began to fell that if that's how that person feels that they should feel the same as well. One of the most famous and impacting quotes made on television was when Walter Cronkite said on live broadcast "What the hell is going on? I thought we were winning this war." Mr Average American had lost faith in the war and live on television. The American public saw it and would have begun to loose faith too. Source D tells us about a public vote that showed how 64% of people who had watched the war on television had said "television made them feel like backing up the boys in Vietnam." This shows that watching the war changed people attitudes about the conflict for the better and made them want to back up the men fighting for the freedom of the Vietnamese peasants, instead of making them feel that they ought to back up the men fighting simply because it was their husbands and fathers and brothers fighting out there. Many commentators have said that television lost the Vietnam War for America - as the full horror of conflict was beamed into people's homes public support diminished. The media coverage on television was bold and aggressive and turned the ordinary Americans against the war. Amie Derricott candidate number: 0231 centre number: 24100 Page 1 of 3 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    He was the youngest ever President and so he played on his youthfulness, he appealed to the younger generation. Caputo says that young men were persuaded to go to war "by Kennedy's challenge to 'ask what you can do for your country'.

  2. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    The letter was written by an American father who wanted his son to be sent home from Vietnam. The father has copied a portion of a letter he received from his son. His son comments on the indiscriminate nature of the American search and destroy missions.

  1. Coursework on discussing whether television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    I also know that four students were shot while peacefully protesting at the Kent State University by the police. So source J supports the statement that colour Television was an important reason why the United States lost the war in Vietnam, because the United States public would have found out about the war through the media and in particular Television.

  2. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    Only think of the Exodus, when after the World War II. They built up a rich country from nothing. They were humiliated, they had nothing only a dream and now you see Israel. Israel, which was thought to be a Jewish country but it is not.

  1. what the Americans did in My Lai source work

    It may have been widely read, or on the other hand it may have only been a handful of people that read it. This is relevant to how much it affected the peace movement in America. The account of the tactics used by the United States may have been biased, as Richard Hamer is American himself.

  2. Disadvantages of Capitalism.

    This form of socialism was successful because everyone believed in the same cause, and that was winning the war. Since the war the Government has still kept a lot of control but the opportunity for entrepreneurship is available. The economy in the United Kingdom is, as far as I can see, the only way a society can flourish.

  1. Explain Why There Were Such Different Reactions In The USA To The Country's Involvement ...

    Members of the Congress had became angry as well because it had know been proven that important desions had been made about the war without the Congress being even told let alone involved and up to date on what was happening.

  2. To what extent was involvement of USA in Korean War Different from its involvement ...

    Since the president of North Korea by the time, Kin IL Sung might have been encouraged by the Chinese government and Russia with military supplies to test USA President, Truman's determination, showing him that communism was the dominant power in Pacific Asia, also with the promise of spreading further very soon.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work