• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using sources 1,2,3,4 and 5 and your own knowledge, how far do you agree with the opinion that the Nazi regime found no difficulty in obtaining the collaboration of ordinary citizens?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using sources 1,2,3,4 and 5 and your own knowledge, how far do you agree with the opinion that the Nazi regime found no difficulty in obtaining the collaboration of ordinary citizens? Contrary to what is often popular belief, people in Germany, as stated by R. Gellately in source 5, are said to have "cooperated" with the Nazi regime when it came to enforcing the law. From this particular statement, it can be construed that Hitler and the Nazis did obtain the collaboration of ordinary citizens with relative ease; however there are many ways in which this can be interpreted. There were some groups under the Nazi regime who opposed many of their ideologies and policies, and made it harder for the Nazis to obtain collaboration of some citizens. Throughout the war, many of these formed. Some, such as the Revolutionary Socialist resistance movement Rote Kapelle and the Communist resistance in Hamburg were focussed around Socialist ideals; however others such as the Kreisau Circle, a conservative discussion group, and the White Rose Movement in Munich were more generally opposed. ...read more.

Middle

for defeatism and sabotage at the rate of a hundred a week." Collaboration may have been present; however whether this was due to belief in the ideologies or fear of being persecuted is another matter. Fear as a tool to increase collaboration appears to be a theme. It is evident in source 3 that in Northeim County, vague information was circulated "for purposes of creating an atmosphere of terror." Often, a fear of the unknown and lack of knowledge of reality increased the so-called popularity of the Nazis, with very little difficulty on their part, by simply intensifying the fear felt by ordinary Germans, and making them more willing to cooperate. We can also see from source 4 that there were Nazi informers in workplaces such as factories to try to suppress resistance to the regime. However, opposition did exist; in one case, "the man responsible for denouncing him was boycotted by the shop floor;" this happened particularly in older, established workforces. This source may be unreliable; being a socialist report, it would be trying to rally opposition. ...read more.

Conclusion

However some Protestants, under, among others, Martin Niemoller, broke away from the interference of the Nazis in the form of the Confessional Church. This shows an outright form of ordinary citizens not collaborating with the Nazis. It may have been difficult for the regime to keep such organisations under control, particularly in the pre-war years; but 1939 saw the abolishment of all religious schools and youth groups in Germany, meaning that for the most part, the Christian body was easier to control. It could be inferred that the Nazis did not have any difficulty in obtaining the collaboration of ordinary citizens, largely due to the apparent lack of opposition they faced, and the divisions within the groups that existed. Largely, however, it can be concluded that their "determined escalation of violence" as detailed by A. Tooze in source 1, was responsible for the levels of collaboration among the population at large. Events such the von Stauffenberg bomb plot, and the following preposterous execution of 5,000 people in a paranoid frenzy, show that violence and intimidation were the main tactics employed by the Nazis in order to obtain collaboration of those ordinary citizens who may or may not have been able to mount some form of effective resistance. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    between the two o No attempt to fuse Nazi party with state administration Compete to implement policies which Hitler merely outlined o Nazi party is not a unified whole Many mass organizations such as: Hitler Youth and SS Hitler kept creating new agencies to get things done quickly o Goering

  2. To what extent was the authoritarian nature of the Nazi regime an aberration in ...

    He feels that, at least in terms of economic policy, the authoritarian nature of the National Socialist economy had been an aberration in respect to previous periods of history and that the role of the state in respect to the economy had not merely been authoritarian in existence, but had been its very embodiment.

  1. Why did the Nazi Regime try to control information?

    This event was portrayed in the media to the people of Germany as a noble act by Hitler that saved Germany from revolution. The purge therefore strengthened and consolidated the support of the people for Hitler. It also provided a legal grounding for the Nazi regime, as the German courts

  2. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    the late 1930's were symptomatic of the short-sighted selfishness of a ruling class set on self-preservation'10. Winston Churchill claimed in his memoirs that appeasement, operating from a position of military weakness, as it had under Chamberlain, was doomed to failure.

  1. Hitler's Willing Executioners - The role of Ordinary Germans during the Holocaust

    This was the adopted policy by Nazis and remained the goal of all anti-Jewish policy until 1941. (The Holocaust: Origins, Implementation, Aftermath pg 23-24 - Omar Bartov, 2000) However that year was a turning point in anti-Jewish history. The Nazis found themselves in the midst of a total war with several million Jews incarcerated in ghettos.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    People are not evil; only individuals are. In rejecting collective guilt, Jaspers by no means excluded the notion of collective responsibility. Adult Germans who lived through the Third Reich and served as active participants in Hitler's world were co-responsible for what happened, perhaps not from a criminal point of view but from a political, moral, and metaphysical one.

  1. WHAT WAS THE EXTENT OF THE OPPOSITION TO HITLER'S REGIME?

    Despite efforts at the end of the 1930s to eradicate it through the paganism of the Nazi Faith Movement, the majority of Germans remained either Catholic or Protestant, and the incidence of church attendance actually increased after 1939. The expression of more general opposition through political activism was confined largely

  2. 'The First World War arose primarily as a result of German aggression.' How far ...

    Belgian neutrality had been guaranteed since the 1837 Treaty of London, therefore, it seems possible that Germany felt ?grand? enough (Source 2) to invade neutral Belgium in order to secure a victory over the French. This annexation reflects aggression from Germany and the key role it played in starting war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work