• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using sources 1,2,3,4 and 5 and your own knowledge, how far do you agree with the opinion that the Nazi regime found no difficulty in obtaining the collaboration of ordinary citizens?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using sources 1,2,3,4 and 5 and your own knowledge, how far do you agree with the opinion that the Nazi regime found no difficulty in obtaining the collaboration of ordinary citizens? Contrary to what is often popular belief, people in Germany, as stated by R. Gellately in source 5, are said to have "cooperated" with the Nazi regime when it came to enforcing the law. From this particular statement, it can be construed that Hitler and the Nazis did obtain the collaboration of ordinary citizens with relative ease; however there are many ways in which this can be interpreted. There were some groups under the Nazi regime who opposed many of their ideologies and policies, and made it harder for the Nazis to obtain collaboration of some citizens. Throughout the war, many of these formed. Some, such as the Revolutionary Socialist resistance movement Rote Kapelle and the Communist resistance in Hamburg were focussed around Socialist ideals; however others such as the Kreisau Circle, a conservative discussion group, and the White Rose Movement in Munich were more generally opposed. ...read more.

Middle

for defeatism and sabotage at the rate of a hundred a week." Collaboration may have been present; however whether this was due to belief in the ideologies or fear of being persecuted is another matter. Fear as a tool to increase collaboration appears to be a theme. It is evident in source 3 that in Northeim County, vague information was circulated "for purposes of creating an atmosphere of terror." Often, a fear of the unknown and lack of knowledge of reality increased the so-called popularity of the Nazis, with very little difficulty on their part, by simply intensifying the fear felt by ordinary Germans, and making them more willing to cooperate. We can also see from source 4 that there were Nazi informers in workplaces such as factories to try to suppress resistance to the regime. However, opposition did exist; in one case, "the man responsible for denouncing him was boycotted by the shop floor;" this happened particularly in older, established workforces. This source may be unreliable; being a socialist report, it would be trying to rally opposition. ...read more.

Conclusion

However some Protestants, under, among others, Martin Niemoller, broke away from the interference of the Nazis in the form of the Confessional Church. This shows an outright form of ordinary citizens not collaborating with the Nazis. It may have been difficult for the regime to keep such organisations under control, particularly in the pre-war years; but 1939 saw the abolishment of all religious schools and youth groups in Germany, meaning that for the most part, the Christian body was easier to control. It could be inferred that the Nazis did not have any difficulty in obtaining the collaboration of ordinary citizens, largely due to the apparent lack of opposition they faced, and the divisions within the groups that existed. Largely, however, it can be concluded that their "determined escalation of violence" as detailed by A. Tooze in source 1, was responsible for the levels of collaboration among the population at large. Events such the von Stauffenberg bomb plot, and the following preposterous execution of 5,000 people in a paranoid frenzy, show that violence and intimidation were the main tactics employed by the Nazis in order to obtain collaboration of those ordinary citizens who may or may not have been able to mount some form of effective resistance. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    between the two o No attempt to fuse Nazi party with state administration Compete to implement policies which Hitler merely outlined o Nazi party is not a unified whole Many mass organizations such as: Hitler Youth and SS Hitler kept creating new agencies to get things done quickly o Goering

  2. Hitler's Willing Executioners - The role of Ordinary Germans during the Holocaust

    He believed in "international Jewry" as an actually existing political subject with vast power that was hostile to Germany. He also believed that a Jewish international conspiracy was intent on exterminating Germany and the Germans. Therefore Hitler portrayed the Holocaust as a defensive act, a necessary move to destroy the Jews before they destroyed Germany.

  1. In the years 1933 " 1945 the German Churches supported and collaborated with the ...

    to one of conflict between the years of 1933 and 1939 because at first the Nazis feared openly standing against religious policies as they felt they were not popular enough to stand against such an institution as the Catholic Church and did not yet have the power.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    this study, that the Nazis thought they were using exterminatory measures out of self-defense against an enemy who was also waging a war of annihilation. Hitler undoubtedly linked Communism with the Jews, which, in his view, 'ustified exterminating them both.

  1. Why did the Nazi Regime try to control information?

    This event was portrayed in the media to the people of Germany as a noble act by Hitler that saved Germany from revolution. The purge therefore strengthened and consolidated the support of the people for Hitler. It also provided a legal grounding for the Nazi regime, as the German courts

  2. To What Extent was Self-Preservation the Prime Motive of the Catholic Church's subservience to ...

    The Church has, throughout modern history, been arguably the biggest obstacle to dictatorship. Whether it was Kulturkampf in Bismarck's Germany, War Communism in Lenin's Russia, or The Papal Land Seizures in Mussolini's Italy, the Catholic Church has proved to be an institution that has needed to be dealt with specifically, in order to successfully create a truly Totalitarianist state.

  1. How far were the policies of Chamberlain in facing the challenges from Nazi Germany ...

    Andrew Boxer tells us that many people in Britain were anxious to avoid war and actively supported the policy of appeasement2. Chamberlain believed that appeasement was only fair in reversing the harsh measures implemented with The Treaty of Versailles. Many people, for example Lloyd George, believed that some of the measures were too harsh.

  2. 'The First World War arose primarily as a result of German aggression.' How far ...

    Belgian neutrality had been guaranteed since the 1837 Treaty of London, therefore, it seems possible that Germany felt ?grand? enough (Source 2) to invade neutral Belgium in order to secure a victory over the French. This annexation reflects aggression from Germany and the key role it played in starting war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work