• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was it a case of the Nazis losing or the Soviets winning on the Russian front during the Second World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(History Coursework) Was it a case of the Nazis losing or the Soviets winning on the Russian front during the Second World War? Intro: In the whole of history there has never been a war like it. In its scale of destruction the war on the Eastern Front was unique; from Leningrad to the Crimea, from Kiev to Stalingrad, the Soviet Union was devastated - at least 25 million Soviet citizens died. And in the end, what did the German aggressors have to show for it? A broken, divided country, which had lost much of its territory, and a people burdened with the knowledge that they had launched a racist war of annihilation and, in the process, spawned the cancer of the Holocaust. But at the time there were many people - and not just Germans - who thought that the decision to invade the Soviet Union was a rational act in pursuit of German self-interest and, moreover, that this was a war the Germans would win. 1939, war has broken out over the world, while most eyes are on the western front with their fairly normal conditions, there is a much more horrifying, terrifying, almost understandably front on the other side of the world, I am about to describe to you the, "USSR FRONT"! This enormous front was over three times the size of the Western front, a massive 1,600 kilometres. Even though the Germans used the same amount of troops on the Russian front as to the Western front, the space that was to be concerned was much larger, therefore the troops had to spread out more. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin justified the Russo-German Pact on the grounds that it gave the country the time to build its defences. Stalin also announced a "scorched earth" policy to deny the Germans "a single engine, or a single railway truck, and not a pound of bread nor a pint of oil." He also announced with "a feeling of gratitude" the offers of assistance from Britain and the United States. So desperate did the Russians become during the early stages of Operation Barbarossa to gain any support and assistance, they even signed an agreement with the Polish government-in-exile, with whom they were not in speaking terms since the Russian occupation of Eastern Poland in September, 1939. By the end of July the Germans controlled an area of the Soviet territory more than twice the size of France. Although Stalin knew of scouts and rumours on the Soviet border, he would not believe that the Germans, the ones that called for the pact in 1939, were preparing an attack! Villagers on the border of the soviet land could here the tank engines starting up as they slowly progressed through the forests. Stalin knew that it was reality but didn't want to believe it. The war on the U.S.S.R front had begun. On the 23rd of June 1941, Hitler ordered his troops to attack the fronts of Leningrad, Baltic Special, Western Special, Kiev Special and the Odessa Military Districts. At the same time as this was happening, Stalin was ordering his troops to mobilise and prepare for German attacks. But some divisions like the navy and some army generals did not take any notice of Stalin's orders, and the ones that did get through, were received at midnight when the Germans were already threatening the border settlements. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mean while, back in Britain, there was wondrous talk of the great comradeship and will that the Soviets gave, and that was shown in massive propaganda posters that the British government had put up to raise morale and say that the "old allies of Britain had come through again." Conclusion: All the above show that there was both massive advantages on both sides. But the winners are winners for a reason. The Soviet comradeship stuck together throughout, they faced some of the worst possible events that could've happened during the Second World War. Also the fact that the USSR called an agreement to the pact in the first place to buy time to build up the country and prepare it for war, proved to be very clever indeed. If you look at the above weapons production table" then you shall see that the Soviets kept building their army throughout. These were two massively important points for the Soviets, along with many others that I cant explain, (I'll probable get marked down for it). But the Germans did have their moments through out this massive war. Their world wide successful "Blitz Kreig" came through again as it did on the western front. And the start attacking strategies were also quite incredible. And the organised communication factors also play a huge part on the field. But over all, I don't at all think it was a case of the Germans winning or losing, it was the fact that the massive, great, legendary RED ARMY of the Soviet Union was unbeatable. So there I leave you with my answer to the pondered question of who won or failed, in the biggest war of all time, the EASTERN FRONT!!! R.Giles 01/05/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    The Bolsheviks displayed political posters in public places because they offered a more effective way of using limited supplies of paper and ink to reach a wide audience. "The peasants were taken in by the propaganda" which advocated that the Reds were by far superior to the Whites by publishing

  2. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    The bases used by the RAF in southern England were bombed and then the German air force, the Luftwaffe, fought battles in the skies against Fighter Command. As these attacks developed, the government wanted to make the British people feel that they were playing their part in the fighting.

  1. How important was the war at sea

    This was a total war. THE WESTERN FRONT When the war broke out across Europe in 1914, it was greeted with enthusiasm. Everyone was exited and they thought that the war would be over by Christmas with a magnificent victory.

  2. American History.

    - In January 1776, a huge step towards the decision to declare independence was taken when Thomas Paine released his book, Common Sense, which was an instant bestseller and had an enormous impact b/c of its challenge of colonial assumptions about the colonies' relationship to Britain.

  1. In what ways did the Second World War affect the lives of ordinary people ...

    Before the war the government had also envisaged the majority of factory production would be concentrated on the war effort. This would there fore reduce the amount of general products available by the country as well. This was another provocative reason to introduce rationing.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Rashid Karame, the man who had forced the Cairo Agreement upon Lebanon became prime minister once again. Even when installed in the government, the army proved unwilling or incapable of exerting authority in Lebanon. The resignation of the military government demonstrated the power vacuum in Lebanese politics and served as the catalyst to conflict.

  1. The Blitz

    areas, this would only show the public of damaged areas of cites and wouldn't show them how little the Germans had done to other areas, this would help the government as people would get more angry at the Germans and this would help to encourage the war and the governments actions would then be supported and not rebelled against.

  2. The Great Terror in Leningrad: a Quantitative Analysis.

    Research for these studies was aided by the partial opening of the Soviet archives to Western historians and the beginnings of the reassessment of the Stalinist past from within the Soviet Union under Gorbachev, as well as a more sympathetic attitude to the goals of the Soviet experiment which underpins much of the social historical school.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work