• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was The League of Nationsa Success or a Failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abdul Mufti 10. F History Homework Mr. Palmer Tuesday 08 May 2007 Was The League of Nations a Success or a Failure? In the 1920's the league of nations was setup in order to preach disarmament, to encourage countries to co-operate, to discourage aggression from any nation and to improve living and working conditions in the whole world. There were, at first, four major members of the league, Britain and France, Italy and Belgium. Unfortunately the USA was not able to become part of the league as much of its population did not agree with it. In a way the league had already taken the turn to failure, as it did not have the money and manpower to be too effective. As the years progressed there were disputes to deal with. In 1920, there was a dispute between Poland and Lithuania, these were two new states created by the post-war treaties. The dispute was over Vilna (now known as Vilnius), which was made the capital of Lithuania, but Vilna's population was mostly polish, in 1920 a Polish army rolled in and took control of it. ...read more.

Middle

Both of these countries wanted control of the Aaland Islands, the Aaland Islands lay between both countries and both countries were threatening to go to war for it. They called d to the league for help. The league slowly and carefully examined the matter and decided the islands should go to Finland. Both countries accepted and so a crisis was averted. This decision was very effective as there was no war, both countries were, once again, at peace with each other and the league had avoided using aggression. In 1923, one of the boundaries that were to be discussed after the war was the border between Greece and Albania. The conference of ambassadors were assigned the job and it appointed an Italian (Italy was Part of the League) general called Tellini to look over it. On August 27th, while the ambassadors were examining the Greek side of the frontier, Tellini and his team were attacked and killed. The Italian leader Mussolini was furious and demanded the Greeks be pay compensation to Italy and the murderers be executed. ...read more.

Conclusion

The league for once acted using force. "Make only slight resistance. Protect the refugees. Prevent the spread of panic. Do not expose the troops to unnecessary losses in view of the fact that the incident has been laid before the council of the league of nations, which is expected to stop the invasion." The league condemned Greece's actions and ordered it to pay compensation to Bulgaria. Faced with disapprovals from major powers in the league Greece obeyed. This dispute was handled effectively however not all the countries, evidently, had disarmed. The league was not trusted again by Greece as it had complained "There seems to be one rule for the larger states (such as Italy) and another for the smaller ones (such as themselves)" In my opinion the league was not a success nor was it a failure. However it is reckoned a failure as there was not enough money and manpower to back it up. Had USA been a part of the league, it may have been a success, but the population complained about the possibility of deaths. Anti French/ British also did not want to help the British and French empires, though it was nothing about them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    1 Fascist dictator (his invasion of Abyssinia was the first step towards accomplishing this). Finally, the League had no armed forces of its own. This was perhaps the ultimate expression of non-commitment to international peace and security. For any sort of peace to be maintained, there needs to be a co-ordinated peace-enforcing organisation, much like NATO today.

  2. "Foreign success; domestic failure." How fair is this summary of Bismarck's governance of Germany

    The combine strength of the two Conservative parties was now sufficient to outvote the National Liberals. BY 1879 an all-party association for tariff reform, made up of mostly Conservatives and Centre Party members, had a majority in the Reichstag. Bismarck introduced a general tariff bill in 1879, was passed through the Reichstag, duties were to be imposed on imports.

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    hardship, as did his reduction of the army medical services to save money (he may have declared that the men's health was of paramount importance to him, but the sick and wounded on campaign were left to die). * Despite these well-founded criticisms, some historians still believe that Napoleon was

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    The Italians were eager for revenge against the Abyssinians because of their loss at the battle of Adowa, in 1898. Combining their will to revenge and their exploitation of the Leagues weakness, the Italians invaded Abyssinia. The league had to resolve this crisis if it was to survive, this wave of problems.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    So basically it was because Britain and France were too worried about what might happen to them if Italy wasn't on their side. And they were worried about this because they were scared of Germany, and if Germany attacked they wanted Italy as an ally.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    So basically it was because Britain and France were too worried about what might happen to them if Italy wasn't on their side. And they were worried about this because they were scared of Germany, and if Germany attacked they wanted Italy as an ally.

  1. Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

    not difficult to determine, and cannot be attributed to the skill of one man. Lynch states that that White armies fought as 'separate detachments'40, and that apart from their obvious 'desire to overthrow the Bolsheviks'41 they were 'not bound together by a single aim'42.

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    Americans feared about the economic cost of joining the League. America had become a powerful country through isolationism and if they were to join the League, economic sanctions against a country would surely be at a loss to the US.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work