• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was The League of Nationsa Success or a Failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abdul Mufti 10. F History Homework Mr. Palmer Tuesday 08 May 2007 Was The League of Nations a Success or a Failure? In the 1920's the league of nations was setup in order to preach disarmament, to encourage countries to co-operate, to discourage aggression from any nation and to improve living and working conditions in the whole world. There were, at first, four major members of the league, Britain and France, Italy and Belgium. Unfortunately the USA was not able to become part of the league as much of its population did not agree with it. In a way the league had already taken the turn to failure, as it did not have the money and manpower to be too effective. As the years progressed there were disputes to deal with. In 1920, there was a dispute between Poland and Lithuania, these were two new states created by the post-war treaties. The dispute was over Vilna (now known as Vilnius), which was made the capital of Lithuania, but Vilna's population was mostly polish, in 1920 a Polish army rolled in and took control of it. ...read more.

Middle

Both of these countries wanted control of the Aaland Islands, the Aaland Islands lay between both countries and both countries were threatening to go to war for it. They called d to the league for help. The league slowly and carefully examined the matter and decided the islands should go to Finland. Both countries accepted and so a crisis was averted. This decision was very effective as there was no war, both countries were, once again, at peace with each other and the league had avoided using aggression. In 1923, one of the boundaries that were to be discussed after the war was the border between Greece and Albania. The conference of ambassadors were assigned the job and it appointed an Italian (Italy was Part of the League) general called Tellini to look over it. On August 27th, while the ambassadors were examining the Greek side of the frontier, Tellini and his team were attacked and killed. The Italian leader Mussolini was furious and demanded the Greeks be pay compensation to Italy and the murderers be executed. ...read more.

Conclusion

The league for once acted using force. "Make only slight resistance. Protect the refugees. Prevent the spread of panic. Do not expose the troops to unnecessary losses in view of the fact that the incident has been laid before the council of the league of nations, which is expected to stop the invasion." The league condemned Greece's actions and ordered it to pay compensation to Bulgaria. Faced with disapprovals from major powers in the league Greece obeyed. This dispute was handled effectively however not all the countries, evidently, had disarmed. The league was not trusted again by Greece as it had complained "There seems to be one rule for the larger states (such as Italy) and another for the smaller ones (such as themselves)" In my opinion the league was not a success nor was it a failure. However it is reckoned a failure as there was not enough money and manpower to back it up. Had USA been a part of the league, it may have been a success, but the population complained about the possibility of deaths. Anti French/ British also did not want to help the British and French empires, though it was nothing about them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Wilson was being a little over-zealous when he advocated international peace and disarmament. It is true to say that if there are no guns then no-one can be shot, but people would not (and still will not as is shown in Northern Ireland)

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Theoretically a strong combination, it was in fact nothing of the sort. * It was not in fact an overall coalition, but a series of separate alliances, and even these links were not complete for there was no alliance between Britain and Austria.

  1. "Foreign success; domestic failure." How fair is this summary of Bismarck's governance of Germany

    Bismarck understood the dangers of a prolonged agrarian depression. Bismarck also knew that relying on foreign grain would seriously weaken Germany's strength in time of war. Bismarck took to Economic Protectionism aiding Germany's self-sufficiency. This act was encourages by an industrial collapse in 1973, leading to produce a crisis of confidence in economic liberalism.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    and its people lacked the moral strength to confront the problems of guilt and punishment. The three major Nazi leaders who were responsible for the decisions that led to the tragedy of World War II - Hitler, Himmler, and Goebbels - had committed suicide.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    In these secret meetings they made some secret agreement some of these involved Abyssinia and yet Abyssinia wasn't even there so one of the major powers was making secret agreements with the country that is almost certainly ready to go to war.

  2. Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

    However, Stalin's rise to power could have been halted if either Trotsky or Lenin had acted earlier. Lenin, for a man of 'such intolerance...he proved remarkably tolerant of Stalin's many sins'52, such as his growing rudeness to himself and

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    Abyssinia would be split up with Italy getting the fertile lands and a large area to the south would be reserved for Italian economic advancement. Neither Italy nor Abyssinia was involved in these "talks". These "talks" were then leaked to the press.

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    There were also many sub failures, one could say, within this big failure of not preventing war. The league lived through many failures. Politicians were now doing mainly what was in their own countries interest. For example Italy and Japan; they were invading Abyssinia and Manchuria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work