• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was The League of Nationsa Success or a Failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abdul Mufti 10. F History Homework Mr. Palmer Tuesday 08 May 2007 Was The League of Nations a Success or a Failure? In the 1920's the league of nations was setup in order to preach disarmament, to encourage countries to co-operate, to discourage aggression from any nation and to improve living and working conditions in the whole world. There were, at first, four major members of the league, Britain and France, Italy and Belgium. Unfortunately the USA was not able to become part of the league as much of its population did not agree with it. In a way the league had already taken the turn to failure, as it did not have the money and manpower to be too effective. As the years progressed there were disputes to deal with. In 1920, there was a dispute between Poland and Lithuania, these were two new states created by the post-war treaties. The dispute was over Vilna (now known as Vilnius), which was made the capital of Lithuania, but Vilna's population was mostly polish, in 1920 a Polish army rolled in and took control of it. ...read more.

Middle

Both of these countries wanted control of the Aaland Islands, the Aaland Islands lay between both countries and both countries were threatening to go to war for it. They called d to the league for help. The league slowly and carefully examined the matter and decided the islands should go to Finland. Both countries accepted and so a crisis was averted. This decision was very effective as there was no war, both countries were, once again, at peace with each other and the league had avoided using aggression. In 1923, one of the boundaries that were to be discussed after the war was the border between Greece and Albania. The conference of ambassadors were assigned the job and it appointed an Italian (Italy was Part of the League) general called Tellini to look over it. On August 27th, while the ambassadors were examining the Greek side of the frontier, Tellini and his team were attacked and killed. The Italian leader Mussolini was furious and demanded the Greeks be pay compensation to Italy and the murderers be executed. ...read more.

Conclusion

The league for once acted using force. "Make only slight resistance. Protect the refugees. Prevent the spread of panic. Do not expose the troops to unnecessary losses in view of the fact that the incident has been laid before the council of the league of nations, which is expected to stop the invasion." The league condemned Greece's actions and ordered it to pay compensation to Bulgaria. Faced with disapprovals from major powers in the league Greece obeyed. This dispute was handled effectively however not all the countries, evidently, had disarmed. The league was not trusted again by Greece as it had complained "There seems to be one rule for the larger states (such as Italy) and another for the smaller ones (such as themselves)" In my opinion the league was not a success nor was it a failure. However it is reckoned a failure as there was not enough money and manpower to back it up. Had USA been a part of the league, it may have been a success, but the population complained about the possibility of deaths. Anti French/ British also did not want to help the British and French empires, though it was nothing about them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    A sign of France's justifiably perpetual fear of Germany was the construction of the Maginot line between 1930-33. France rearmed on a major scale in 1935 as a result of German rearmament. The Depression acted as a trigger cause for Japan to turn aggressive - as previously explained.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Even more important there was no agreement on a unified military strategy, nor was there a commitment by the allies not to make a separate peace with France if it suited their interests to do so. * Although Austrian and Russian forces pushed the French out of Italy in the

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    The whole idea of the league was to stop aggressors and yet here they were trying to come to some sort of deal with them. Because of these meetings Mussolini thought that both Britain and France wouldn't object at Italy gaining another African colony of its own as both Britain and France had colonies of their own.

  2. "Foreign success; domestic failure." How fair is this summary of Bismarck's governance of Germany

    The adoption of protective tariffs by France, Russia and Austria-Hungary in the late 1870s seemed to make it more desirable and perhaps showing signs of developing interests rather than economic understanding. The federal government's revenue raise from customs duties and indirect taxation was proving to be far too inadequate to cover growing costs of armaments and administration.

  1. Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

    Mistrusting formal intellectuals (like Trotsky), they were to become his 'main supporters in the power struggle against Trotsky'57.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Air raids and a new type of "magnetic" mine inflicted heavy destruction of British shipping, forcing the merchant vessels to crowed into western harbors which were at the time beyond the range of German bombers. The British navy countered the German move by multiplying their sea and air patrols, tightening the blockade, scrutinizing all neutral shipping.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    They even let Italy use the Suez Canal to supply their army; they could have closed it which would probably have stopped the Italian invasion outright. Secretly Britain and France agreed a plan that they thought would bring the invasion to an end.

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    Also Americans did not want to see US troops sent around the world to settle every little conflict. So when the opposition to Wilson campaigned for America to be isolationist, the Republican Warren Gamaliel Harding won the elections by a landside.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work