• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was The League of Nationsa Success or a Failure?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Abdul Mufti 10. F History Homework Mr. Palmer Tuesday 08 May 2007 Was The League of Nations a Success or a Failure? In the 1920's the league of nations was setup in order to preach disarmament, to encourage countries to co-operate, to discourage aggression from any nation and to improve living and working conditions in the whole world. There were, at first, four major members of the league, Britain and France, Italy and Belgium. Unfortunately the USA was not able to become part of the league as much of its population did not agree with it. In a way the league had already taken the turn to failure, as it did not have the money and manpower to be too effective. As the years progressed there were disputes to deal with. In 1920, there was a dispute between Poland and Lithuania, these were two new states created by the post-war treaties. The dispute was over Vilna (now known as Vilnius), which was made the capital of Lithuania, but Vilna's population was mostly polish, in 1920 a Polish army rolled in and took control of it. ...read more.

Middle

Both of these countries wanted control of the Aaland Islands, the Aaland Islands lay between both countries and both countries were threatening to go to war for it. They called d to the league for help. The league slowly and carefully examined the matter and decided the islands should go to Finland. Both countries accepted and so a crisis was averted. This decision was very effective as there was no war, both countries were, once again, at peace with each other and the league had avoided using aggression. In 1923, one of the boundaries that were to be discussed after the war was the border between Greece and Albania. The conference of ambassadors were assigned the job and it appointed an Italian (Italy was Part of the League) general called Tellini to look over it. On August 27th, while the ambassadors were examining the Greek side of the frontier, Tellini and his team were attacked and killed. The Italian leader Mussolini was furious and demanded the Greeks be pay compensation to Italy and the murderers be executed. ...read more.

Conclusion

The league for once acted using force. "Make only slight resistance. Protect the refugees. Prevent the spread of panic. Do not expose the troops to unnecessary losses in view of the fact that the incident has been laid before the council of the league of nations, which is expected to stop the invasion." The league condemned Greece's actions and ordered it to pay compensation to Bulgaria. Faced with disapprovals from major powers in the league Greece obeyed. This dispute was handled effectively however not all the countries, evidently, had disarmed. The league was not trusted again by Greece as it had complained "There seems to be one rule for the larger states (such as Italy) and another for the smaller ones (such as themselves)" In my opinion the league was not a success nor was it a failure. However it is reckoned a failure as there was not enough money and manpower to back it up. Had USA been a part of the league, it may have been a success, but the population complained about the possibility of deaths. Anti French/ British also did not want to help the British and French empires, though it was nothing about them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Britain was concerned with maintaining it's empire; Gandhi was campaigning for Indian independence and British overseas territories were under threat from one power or another. In the Mediterranean, Italy was slowly turning aggressive and in the Pacific Japan was expanding.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Even more important there was no agreement on a unified military strategy, nor was there a commitment by the allies not to make a separate peace with France if it suited their interests to do so. * Although Austrian and Russian forces pushed the French out of Italy in the

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    and they wanted Italy as a future ally against Germany so they didn't want to be too harsh with Italy in case they then wouldn't help against Germany. In January 1935, the French foreign minister, Laval, met with Mussolini in Rome for a number of secret meetings.

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    Also some social improvements such as curbing international traffic in opiates and prostitution, aiding refugees of World War I, and surveying and improving health and labour conditions around the world. Historians are divided whether the League was a success in the 20's but they are certainly all agreed when it

  1. Hitlers Germany

    It was the Allied powers that instituted, each in its own peculiar ways, what became known as "denazification" -that is, identifying those who had been seriously implicated in the Nazi regime, punishing them, and excluding them permanently from public office.

  2. "The League of Nations representedno more than

    There were also many sub failures, one could say, within this big failure of not preventing war. The league lived through many failures. Politicians were now doing mainly what was in their own countries interest. For example Italy and Japan; they were invading Abyssinia and Manchuria.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    The whole idea of the league was to stop aggressors and yet here they were trying to come to some sort of deal with them. Because of these meetings Mussolini thought that both Britain and France wouldn't object at

  2. "Foreign success; domestic failure." How fair is this summary of Bismarck's governance of Germany

    A major dispute was over the military budget, at first agreeing in 1867, that the budget should remain at a fixed level outside Reichstag control until 1872. After the Franco-Prussian war in 1874, Bismarck presented a law which stated that an army of over 400, 000 men would be automatically financed by federal expenditure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work