• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Winston Churchill a great war leader?

Extracts from this document...


Was Winston Churchill a great war leader? Source one is Winston Churchill's life in order of dates. It tells us of his background, which was being born in 1874 and after going to Harrow (Public school), he went to Sandhurst Military Academy. This would have taught him how to fight and how to be a leader. Then he became a soldier and he was for four years. This would have shown his fighting spirit. After this he was a journalist in South Africa and this would have helped him write good speeches which we know that he could do. From there he became a politician as he was elected as a Conservative MP. Up until 1924, he changed his party and went to the liberal party which is where he became a junior minister. He then became Cabinet minister and he had two spells at this position from 1908-15 and 1917-22. At the Liberal party he fails to be elected MP and in the same year he returns to the Conservative party and he was again elected MP. Between 1924 and 1940 he holds different positions which include Chancellor of the Exchequer and Cabinet Minister before finally in 1940 he became the Prime Minister. All this experience, being in politics for 36 years, should have helped him have a long period in the position but after five years he finished. He was the leader of the opposition before returning back to the Prime Minister's position in 1951. ...read more.


Source 12 is a speech from Churchill and some people say that is was his finest moments. This is a fair interpretation of him being a great war leader because it shows his courage and determination. It also shows us that he knew how to get people psyched up for the battle. Source 13 is not a fair interpretation of him being a great war leader because it shows him sitting next to Roosevelt and Stalin but he looking up to them because he is lower down. This shows that they did not think that he was at the same level as the other two leaders. But it does show that he had the fighting spirit to carry on and win. Source 14 is a fair interpretation because it is a paper from 1944 that says that Churchill wanted to go to the battle but the king would not let him go. This shows us that he was willing to do what it took to win and he was confident that his keeping up of morale would have helped them. The next source says that 89% of people in 1940, when Britain were staring defeat in the face, still thought that he was a good war leader. This source is a fair interpretation because it shows what people at the time thought of him which was a overall good response. The main reason that the source says that they did this was because of the image that was created of him from the media. ...read more.


He has had the victory in Europe despite people saying that he wouldn't and without the backing of some of the officials in the war cabinet. He had delivered what he said that he would do from the beginning. Source 28 is again a fair interpretation. He had won the war, obtained the American alliance and helped save us all from the Soviets. Source 29 is not a fair interpretation because by basically writing his own biography he knew that some of the things that he done, he did not want future generations to know about them. But in another way this was a clever plan because it did stop people questioning some of the things that he had done and some of the decisions that he had made. Source 30 shows that it is a fair interpretation that he was a great war leader. At the beginning he said that he would win the war and with his "V" for victory symbol he always had faith in himself and up until the last few years of the war most of the British public did as well. He fused together "British power" to its maximum possible extent to survive and to participate in victory. Churchill's strengths were his morale boosting techniques and his speeches to his troops and the officials in the war cabinet, but he did make some rash decisions which led to the losses on Norway and France. He sacked people for making minor mistakes and he was too domineering. All of the media coverage of Churchill makes us think that all that he did was good and that influences our opinions of him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did Winston Churchill become so important as Prime Minister of Britain between 1940 ...

    Let us therefore brace ourselves for our duties, and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand year, Men will say: 'This was their finest hour'." This is one of many heart-warming speeches, which portrays Churchill's emotions; this was a quality he was not afraid to show.

  2. The great Patriotic war - From incompetence to victory.

    tanks than in 1940 and nearly four times more than in 1941. The output of aircraft increased by 37 percent from 1942 to 1943. Between 1942 and 1945 the Soviet Union produced about 100,000 tanks, 120,000 airplanes, 360,00 guns, over 1,200,000 machine guns, 6,000,000 Tommy guns, some 700,000,000 shells and some 20 billion cartridges.

  1. "Why did Winston Churchill become so important as Prime Minister of Britain between 1940 ...

    He was soon back standing as an independent candidate, and then won the by-election, rejoining the Conservative Party. He became Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1924 which requiring him to look after the nation's finances. Yet again he failed in this position by putting the British pound back on the 'gold standard'.

  2. The Great Terror in Leningrad: a Quantitative Analysis.

    The basis for shooting or dispatch to the camps might be an unsuitable pre-revolutionary past, participation in the civil war on the side of the Bolsheviks' enemies, membership of other political parties or opposition groups within the CPSU, previous convictions, membership of 'suspect' nationalities (Germans, Poles, Koreans etc.), finally family connections and associations with representatives of the enumerated categories.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    In early 1976, the situation seemed ripe for a large scale military action within the army. On that objective Palestinian leaders, notably Arafat, Abu Iyad, Abu Jihad, Abu Hassan Salameh, were in agreement. Fateh leaders Abu Jihad and Abu Hassan Salameh were in control of the LAA, and were assisted by military commanders.

  2. Were Some Contemporaries Correct In Their Belief That Churchill Was A Great War Leader?

    In 1896 when his regiment was sent to India, he secured a temporary transfer to the turbulent North West Frontier where a tribal insurrection was under way. When the Boer War (1899-1902) broke out in South Africa he went as a journalist, was captured by the Boers while defending an ambushed train and imprisoned in a military prison.

  1. Was Churchill a manufactured hero 1930-1945?

    ask for the return of lost territory and lost colonies.'3 At the time Hitler was coming to power Churchill held no position of power. He did however believe the policies pursued by the government were right at the time. These policies were of Britain detaching herself from European Politics.

  2. An Investigation Into the Way in Which Sir Winston Churchill Used Rhetoric During the ...

    Rhetoric is defined by Crockcroft and Crockcroft in their book Persuading People (1992) as 'the art of persuasive discourse', her to refer to both spoken and written communication. The Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322BC) wrote extensively on the 'art' of rhetoric, seeing it as an important part of human activity, and so worth categorising and defining in great detail.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work