• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What can you learn from source A about women's work during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. What can you learn from source A about women's work during the First World War? Source A informs the reader, that women during the war were in the domestic service and "hated every minute of it," there was a need for women "war workers" in work such as munitions. Women in the domestic service worked "15 hours day's and earned "�2 a month" which improved when they started war work, in this case "12 hour day's" and "�5 a week." Women saw war work as a new opportunity "my chance came out" and enjoyed the new role and freedom that came with the war work. The source's origin was of a lady who lived and worked in the great war, the nature of the source is a personal letter, the source does not have any alternative motive as the purpose is just to inform a friend about the war. Though the women who wrote the source had first hand experience of war work. She may be the minority of people who preferred war work and the majority did not, though we know this was mot the case as in 1918 most women were disappointed and did not want to go back to pre-war work. The letter was written in 1976 and possibly her view could have been distorted by time and vital information and her opinions of the time could have been forgotten, war work could be seen through "rose coloured spectacles." ...read more.

Middle

Many other sources support this "when the men came back women were expected to go back to their old jobs," G Thomas, life on all fronts gives similar information as source D Source E is poster issued by the British government in 1916 to encourage women to enrol and do war work in munitions factories. It is a picture of a woman putting on a work jacket in the background, men waving getting on a train bound for the war. The caption at the top of the poster states "these women are doing their bit" and at the bottom it reads "learn to make munitions." This is a useful source as it shows techniques used to get women to work buy trying to create a good public image, with a good looking healthy women helping to do war work. The background of men going to war implies working was as important as fighting and that by working they would help their men win the war. The source reads learn to make munitions and not other things, as these were important to the war implying that so was the women's work. Source E is not particularly reliable as it is "government propaganda" and is a picture directly effected by the government. The source has important uses as it gives a message that women's war work is that important it could be a deceive factor in wining the total war and that not enough women worked as they needed to recruit. ...read more.

Conclusion

Nursing was common for women to work as and helped put more injured men back at the front-line increasing the chance of victory. Work in the armed forces in secretarial jobs freed up many men to go and fight also women worked on aircraft and similar things as indicated in source B this was important as recognisance flying gave much needed information about the enemies position to the commanders. All these occupations directly effected the war but the land girls who worked to produce food played a pivotal role in keeping up the home front. At the end of the war one of the main reasons for the German surrender is because of food shortages brought about by the British naval blockade. Women also worked in transport and other jobs to keep the country running smoothly as source I suggests they became "familiar figures" Though women made a difference the role of women could be perceived as not important and that the fighting in France was the deciding factor, also during the battle of the Somme the women's poor training led to "a third of the 1.5 million shells fired being duds." Though it was the military that eventually won the war, in my opinion without the women's war work on the home front prevented a implosion of the country leading to possible revolts e.g. Russia and the women freed many men go to the front line though due to poor tactics they had no substantial presence ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Thinking that the Germans had been destroyed by the bombardment, and fearing that their inexperienced soldiers would become disorganised in a rush attack, the generals had ordered that the men should walk, in straight lines, across No Man's Land. They were slaughtered.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * Exports of US grain to the Soviet Union were stopped. * The USA refused to ratify SALT II. * The USA boycotted the 1980 Olympic Games, which were held in Moscow. * In 1981 talks on Intermediate Range Missiles (SS-20s and Cruise)

  1. Women and social change - To what extent did World War One effect womens ...

    age had entered the war, many women were left without families to look after and men to take to take care of them. "Most women toiled at unskilled jobs; most were young, single, and without children" (307). This lack of family and funds left women with no other place to go besides the factories.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    for security would be relegated to the reconstituted and religiously integrated Lebanese Army, supported by Syrian forces. More broadly, the accord envisaged a "strategic integration" of the two countries in the spheres of military affairs, national security, and foreign relations.

  1. Vietnam source based work

    I think the least useful of these sources is Source I. This is because it is only an article from a magazine and it doesn't show the public reaction to the Vietnam War. There is no information given to show peoples reaction to this article.

  2. The Home Front - source related study

    their partners, who like 10,000,000 other British men had joined the armed forces. The factories were being manned by less employees than before who struggled to maintain output. It took The Great Shell Shortage of May 1915 to alert the government's attention to the reality that more workers were desperately required to increase the production of weapons and ammunitions.

  1. The First World War

    This also helped a stalemate develop on the western front because the trenches were built both to avoid losses from bullets and shells. An example of the particular strategic use of these new guns could be in the Battle of the Somme in 1916.

  2. In 1915 a British Newspaper printed a letter from a 'Lady Reader' who claimed, ...

    There were a total of 57 raids on British towns, killing 564 people and injuring 1370. These were innocent civilians and Britain didn't even think of invading Germany in the same way. The press used these bombings to show the British public how evil the Germans were and what would happed if Britain didn't win the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work