• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What factors have contributed to the collapse of successive regimes in Central and Eastern Europe?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chris Randall "What factors have contributed to the collapse of successive regimes in Central and Eastern Europe"? From 1900 to 1992, Central and Eastern Europe has seen the rise and fall of empires, suffered under dictatorships and lived under the influence of Soviet Russia in the Eastern Bloc. Within this time countries have been formed and broken up, mainly due to the world wars and civil wars. I will look at the changes and the factors that caused them over this time period. In 1900 some of the main powers in Europe lay within the Ottoman and the Austro-Hungarian empires. Both were made up of a vast amount of different countries, which is one of the factors that contributed to later collapse of these empires. Due to the vast ethnic diversity, there were often conflicts between races over land and their different religions. There were also language barriers making it difficult for only one ruler to control the empire. The autocracy of these countries may have also caused problems with riots such as what was happening around that time within Russia. As time went on another problem started emerge. In both empires the rulers often were in power for years, running in the family. ...read more.

Middle

With Hitler controlling Central and Eastern Europe, the people living in these countries were subjected to the hash dictatorship of the Nazis and they didn't realise that they wouldn't gain independence to govern themselves again until the late 1980's. During World War Two, industry would have suffered again because although Germany would have provided most of the industrial output, the invaded countries would have supplied armaments as well. This meant that the industry would have been focused on weapons manufacture, leaving the countries in a dire position at the end of the war, needing basic raw materials, food and other domestic goods. The end of the war saw another regime fall out of power. With Nazi Germany losing the war, all its power was taken from them, with the USSR liberating most of the countries in East Europe apart from Yugoslavia which, through an uprising, saw it liberate itself. Stalin was quoted by saying "we have what we hold". Stalin believed the USSR was entitled to remain in the countries they had liberated as they wanted to create a buffer zone as protection from Germany. He was able to do this with the help of the Red Army, which was already situated in these countries, and by placing Stalinists in the existing Communist Parties. ...read more.

Conclusion

His policies of 'Perestroika' and 'Glasnost' effectively allowed these countries to decide their own way of being governed without any consequences from the Warsaw Pact or the USSR, leaving Communism to collapse and Russia able to try and rebuild and reconstruct its industry. One by one these countries overturned the Communist governments and replaced them with their own. This occurred all over the Eastern Bloc over a period of a few months in late 1989. This enabled countries to decide their own fate with the most notable change coming in 1992 from Czechoslovakia when it divided into two countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Through revolts, stagnant economies and the end of the Cold War, Central and Eastern European countries were able to gain their freedom and democracy. The main factors which have contributed in collapsing successive regimes seem to be the two world wars, suffering industries and economies and ageing/stagnant policies and leaders. With ethnic diversity throughout, regimes have failed to maintain power over the collective countries. Now countries which were once deemed by the West to be backwards and involved with the USSR, such as the Czech Republic and Poland, are now hoping to join the E.U in 2004, with other countries like them in Central and Eastern Europe hoping to join at a later date. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    On 28 June 1914, the heir to the Austrian throne, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, were shot dead in Sarajevo by a Serbian terrorist Gavrilo Princip. Franz Ferdinand was a popular figure in Austria, but he had incurred the dislike of the Austrian court and royal family by marrying a woman who was regarded as unsuitable.

  2. The Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe

    Unfortunately for Khrushchev, he was to be tested again the very same month. In October 1956, Hungary decided to rebel. Hungary was led by a hard-line Communist named R�kosi. The people of Hungry hated the restrictions that R�kosi's Communism imposed on them.

  1. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    This was the official end of the Soviet Union. The demise of the Cold War played a role in the collapse of the Soviet Union, and though developments in Eastern Europe affected the Cold War there is also a direct link between the Soviet Union's domestic affairs and the developments in Eastern Europe.

  2. The Collapse of Communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe

    technologically, that the extent of the economic crisis in the communist states first became apparent. Dissent in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, and, to a lesser extent, East Germany, had rung the alarm bells frequently throughout the preceding two decades, but the dilemma had never really absorbed much of the leadership's notice until now.

  1. Events in the Soviet Union brought down Communist regimes in Eastern Europe - Discuss

    He constantly referred to this as "activate the human factor"2, both workers and managers alike needed to be taught and shown that they could no longer carry on in their lax and corrupt ways. Gorbachev failed to appreciate that the very foundations of the Soviet command economy were outdated and detrimental to promoting and maintaining a successful economy.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Until ratification (1870) of the 15TH AMENDMENT, which made it illegal to deny the vote on the grounds of race, most northern states refused blacks the vote. A Nation Transformed: The South Like the North, the South was transformed by the Civil War and its aftermath.

  1. Why did the Soviet Union maintain a presence in Eastern Europe? And why did ...

    It must be emphasised at this point that Stalin's policy in Eastern Europe was to pillage resources from the 'satellites' in order to rebuild a war-torn Russia. Khrushchev swung the balance back toward an appeal for viability in Eastern Europe with not altogether positive results.

  2. Why did tsarism collapse?

    This led to Austria declaring war on Serbia which in turn led to Russia, defender of the Slavs declaring war on Austria. This effect, continued by balance of power politics and eventually led to war between France, Great Britain and Russia on one side and Germany, Austria, Hungary on the other.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work