• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What factors have contributed to the collapse of successive regimes in Central and Eastern Europe?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chris Randall "What factors have contributed to the collapse of successive regimes in Central and Eastern Europe"? From 1900 to 1992, Central and Eastern Europe has seen the rise and fall of empires, suffered under dictatorships and lived under the influence of Soviet Russia in the Eastern Bloc. Within this time countries have been formed and broken up, mainly due to the world wars and civil wars. I will look at the changes and the factors that caused them over this time period. In 1900 some of the main powers in Europe lay within the Ottoman and the Austro-Hungarian empires. Both were made up of a vast amount of different countries, which is one of the factors that contributed to later collapse of these empires. Due to the vast ethnic diversity, there were often conflicts between races over land and their different religions. There were also language barriers making it difficult for only one ruler to control the empire. The autocracy of these countries may have also caused problems with riots such as what was happening around that time within Russia. As time went on another problem started emerge. In both empires the rulers often were in power for years, running in the family. ...read more.

Middle

With Hitler controlling Central and Eastern Europe, the people living in these countries were subjected to the hash dictatorship of the Nazis and they didn't realise that they wouldn't gain independence to govern themselves again until the late 1980's. During World War Two, industry would have suffered again because although Germany would have provided most of the industrial output, the invaded countries would have supplied armaments as well. This meant that the industry would have been focused on weapons manufacture, leaving the countries in a dire position at the end of the war, needing basic raw materials, food and other domestic goods. The end of the war saw another regime fall out of power. With Nazi Germany losing the war, all its power was taken from them, with the USSR liberating most of the countries in East Europe apart from Yugoslavia which, through an uprising, saw it liberate itself. Stalin was quoted by saying "we have what we hold". Stalin believed the USSR was entitled to remain in the countries they had liberated as they wanted to create a buffer zone as protection from Germany. He was able to do this with the help of the Red Army, which was already situated in these countries, and by placing Stalinists in the existing Communist Parties. ...read more.

Conclusion

His policies of 'Perestroika' and 'Glasnost' effectively allowed these countries to decide their own way of being governed without any consequences from the Warsaw Pact or the USSR, leaving Communism to collapse and Russia able to try and rebuild and reconstruct its industry. One by one these countries overturned the Communist governments and replaced them with their own. This occurred all over the Eastern Bloc over a period of a few months in late 1989. This enabled countries to decide their own fate with the most notable change coming in 1992 from Czechoslovakia when it divided into two countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Through revolts, stagnant economies and the end of the Cold War, Central and Eastern European countries were able to gain their freedom and democracy. The main factors which have contributed in collapsing successive regimes seem to be the two world wars, suffering industries and economies and ageing/stagnant policies and leaders. With ethnic diversity throughout, regimes have failed to maintain power over the collective countries. Now countries which were once deemed by the West to be backwards and involved with the USSR, such as the Czech Republic and Poland, are now hoping to join the E.U in 2004, with other countries like them in Central and Eastern Europe hoping to join at a later date. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    The Austrian government expected the Serbs to reject this. July 28 - Austria-Hungary declared war upon Serbia. July 29 - The Russian army was mobilised. Aug 1 - Germany declared war on Russia. Aug 3 - Germany declared war on France. Aug 4 - Germany declared war on Belgium Aug 4 - Britain declared war on Germany Why did Britain declare war on Germany?

  2. How secure was the USSR’s control over Eastern Europe 1948-89?

    * In 1976 he was sacked from the shipyard for making malicious statements about the organisation and working climate.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    The premise underlying both organizations was that a stable world required healthy economies based on free trade. Attitudes toward economic reconstruction had direct import for postwar policies toward Germany and Eastern Europe. It would be difficult to have a stable European economy without a significant industrial base in Germany.

  2. How important were developments in Eastern Europe to the collapse of the Soviet Union?

    However, the speedy resolution of the Iraq conflict caused oil prices to plunge further, exacerbating the economic problems that the SU faced during the Western recession of 1990. The Soviet Union was not overthrown by people's power in terms of a revolution, not by strikes, large-scale anti-government demonstrations, unlike in the Baltic states, Czechoslovakia, and Poland.

  1. The Collapse of Communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe

    technologically, that the extent of the economic crisis in the communist states first became apparent. Dissent in Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, and, to a lesser extent, East Germany, had rung the alarm bells frequently throughout the preceding two decades, but the dilemma had never really absorbed much of the leadership's notice until now.

  2. Events in the Soviet Union brought down Communist regimes in Eastern Europe - Discuss

    He constantly referred to this as "activate the human factor"2, both workers and managers alike needed to be taught and shown that they could no longer carry on in their lax and corrupt ways. Gorbachev failed to appreciate that the very foundations of the Soviet command economy were outdated and detrimental to promoting and maintaining a successful economy.

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    While U.S. armies invaded the heartland of Mexico to gain victory, other forces sliced off the northern half of that country--the provinces of New Mexico and Alta California. In the Treaty of GUADALUPE HIDALGO (1848), $15 million was paid for the Mexican cession of those provinces, more than 3 million sq km (roughly 1 million sq m).

  2. Why did the Soviet Union maintain a presence in Eastern Europe? And why did ...

    of the communist system as a whole. Communism could not exist in one country alone because ideologically it would not be possible to oppose capitalism, nor would it be possible to do so politically and economically. Only with the arrival of Gorbachev who saw that the historical reasons for the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work