Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

why a stalemate grew on the western front

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the First World War, there were a number of reasons why a stalemate grew on the western front. Firstly, there was unexpected Belgian resistance. The Kaiser of Germany expected no resistance from Belgium and expected Belgium to let Germany's army through without confrontation. When the German army advanced into Belgium, they faced opposition from the Belgians. If a Belgian was to shoot at one person at the front, it had a chain reaction effect on the rest of the army. This then disrupted plans of defeating France quickly and the element of surprise was lost. This helped to create a stalemate because it gave time for the French to prepare for the German attack and the BEF also had time to deploy in Belgium. ...read more.

Middle

At Ypres, the British made a stand to stop the 'hook' attack of the plan. This forced Germans to head straight for Paris and abandon the 'hook' attack, but the French were ready for them. A further assumption was that France would be defeated easily. The French were ready for the German attack and were equipped with modern technology such as machine guns. This modern technology was suited to defensive tactics rather than attacking, so the casualty rates on both sides fell. Because the German army marched in a groups of 100's they were mowed down by the French. This helped to create a stalemate because the German army fled to safety when confronted with machine guns. ...read more.

Conclusion

When Von Kluck realised that the Schlieffen plan would not work, he ordered the army to head straight for Paris and abandon the hook strategy. The German army met French defences at Marne. This was where stalemate occurred. Trenches were first dug at Aisne to protect themselves and also to hold onto enemy land that had been invaded. Both sides dug trenches and expanded them. In my opinion the main reason for stalemate is the extra resistance from Belgium and the BEF. I think this because if Belgium had not resisted then the German army would have advanced into France and invaded Paris. France would not have been ready for the German army and would have been easily slaughtered. Also, the BEF would not have joined the opposition and slowed down the attack on France. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    He is saying this because his not sure that they can win this war, and wants to warn the nation that soldiers are going to die; so they aren't shocked when there's a massive number of dead soldiers. Source B is written after the first day of attack; his is

  2. The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the ...

    The Americans still joined although the President, Woodrow Wilson, had wanted to keep out the war in Europe. Germany had also tried to encourage Mexico to become an ally, and as a direct threat, persuade them to attack America. The American Declaration of war made the Germans aware that they needed to win the war as soon as possible.

  1. How important was Haig's tactics on the Western Front in bringing an end to ...

    On the first day in the Battle of the Somme, 20,000 British men died and there were 60,000 casualties. Unlike Haig had originally planned, the 5 day Allied bombardment had not destroyed German men, machine guns or barbed wire. After the initial failure, the attack continued and infantry were sent across.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    By trying to fight around the trenches, both sides extended their trenches down to Switzerland, which made the stalemate even more apparent, with both armies' spread evenly across the trench system. C) The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken: New technology

  1. The Breaking of Stalemate on the Western Front.

    Although American troops did not go into action until 1 June 1918, they were fresh and not weary of fighting like the other nations involved. The Americans were effective and boosted the morale of the soldiers already fighting and made the morale of the Germans drop rapidly.

  2. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    Paris hoping to smash army of Lanzarec engaged in bitter fighting with Bulow's II army at Guise * LIDDELL HART: so much grit had worked its way into the German machine that a slight jar would suffice to cause its breakdown. This was supplied in the battle of the Marne.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work