• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front? The main reason trenches developed on the western front is due to the failure of the Schlieffen plan, if it had not been for this elaborate quick way to win the war by Germany, trench warfare may never have developed in WWI. As the Germans were being pushed back from Marne they had to dig trenches to protect themselves from the advancing allies, and the allies mirrored them and did the same. The conventional explanation offered by historians for the stalemate on the western front (an area stretching from Belgium all the way down to the Alps) is that by 1914 technology and industrialism had overtaken military strategy and tactics, making them obsolete. Supposedly machine guns and rapid-fire artillery had made the traditional tactics worthless; linear tactics and cavalry charges were things of the past by 1914, and also bad choices were made by inexperienced commanders. It makes one wonder had the British commanders really been clued up to the art of modern warfare maybe the war might not have been so disastrous in terms of casualties. ...read more.

Middle

The Germans had, however, stuck by this new technology and were duly rewarded, a single one was known to be able to kill hundreds of oncoming troops. this alone is damaging, enough to tip the balance of warfare, but with the Germans setting up a crossfire and the fact that the British were simply walking over "No man's land" - it was all too easy. Some may say that the lack of aerial reconnaissance, the fact that Germany was prepared (through their own aerial reconnaissance) or the ineffectiveness of the shelling to take out enemy fortifications , troops and guns (i don't think it was their place to use such an untested weapon and to place it on the lives of thousands of men when the soldiers were so inexperienced in using such a device) resulted in the poor performance of the generals but ultimately i think it comes down to a lack of respect for human life (to the extent that it can be held without putting oneself at a disadvantage in warfare) ...read more.

Conclusion

New weapons were being developed, like gas shells and bombs, which could kills masses depending on which way the wind was blowing. As the commanders were rookies in the art of modern warfare, they refused to place much trust in tanks and aircrafts, which if used effectively may have been a weapon that could enable them to break through enemy lines. To achieve the element of surprise was extremely hard in the First World War, as not only were the men watching no-mans land almost 24/7, all attacks normally followed, a long artillery bombardment, or were just generally predictable, and even when on no-mans land, it was not easy to traverse due to large craters in it due to artillery fire. Compared to previous wars Britain had been in, it is not like any of them, the warfare was completely different, and also Germany was an equal opponent to them, with the same developing technologies, and a bigger army. All in all, stalemate on the western front was a combination of the failure of the Schlieffen plan, the incompetence of commanders, the development of technology and the fact that they were two very equally matched sides. Stuart Butcher 11R ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    This source may be similar to Source H; however I don't think that it supports it. Source G states that the Germans lost the war because of the huge numbers lost, 'most experienced and most reliable officers and men were no longer in their places/this was marked as the heavy losses'.

  2. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    As I became aquatinted with Forrest I realised that without his naivete of language he would not be half as loveable. Although he does not always comprehend the depth of his words they have a significant impact upon those who hear them.

  1. The First World War - questions and answers on the Schlieffen plan, and the ...

    The soldiers soon became aware of the problems at home so consequently they lost moral in the war and their intentions were to go home to their families. At the German Offensive in March 1918 was Germany's Final attempt to win the war, it was named 'Operation Michael' which consisted of new tactics and weapons.

  2. Captain Corelli's Mandolin - Chapter 63 is called 'Liberation.' How does de Bernieres ...

    Shakespeare's character Hamlet had a fatal character flaw of vacillation which caused his death, so too does Mandras, he was stubborn, ignorant and finally gullible to believe the communists would be living a better life. Mandras' faith also became insecure and eventually he gave up easily on God and how

  1. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    This became apparent in a meeting with his army commanders in early August 1914. When General Yvon Dubail, commander of the First army asked for additional troops for his attack into Alsace, Joffre coyly responded, "That's your plan, not mine".

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914 ? How was ...

    Soldiers did not want to attack because these guns, also when attacks did happen the machine gun normally ensured that most of the men died in no-mans land. Sometimes the generals would try and send a lot of men to one place and try and push thought at that place,

  1. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    * January 1915, Western Front ran for over 750 kms. Much unsuitable for a large-scale offensive. ? The Officers and their men. Officers separated by status and privilege * Officers had separate brothels and cinemas, separate treatment of shell shock.

  2. What Broke the Stalemate Stalemate is the word used to describe the situation on ...

    From that day on the Germans retreated continuously until they were back at the Hindenburg Line. The Germans big all or nothing gamble hadn't paid off, therefore they were left with nothing. That is why I think it is one of the most important reasons why it broke the stalemate on the Western Front.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work