• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did stalemate develop on the Western Front? The main reason trenches developed on the western front is due to the failure of the Schlieffen plan, if it had not been for this elaborate quick way to win the war by Germany, trench warfare may never have developed in WWI. As the Germans were being pushed back from Marne they had to dig trenches to protect themselves from the advancing allies, and the allies mirrored them and did the same. The conventional explanation offered by historians for the stalemate on the western front (an area stretching from Belgium all the way down to the Alps) is that by 1914 technology and industrialism had overtaken military strategy and tactics, making them obsolete. Supposedly machine guns and rapid-fire artillery had made the traditional tactics worthless; linear tactics and cavalry charges were things of the past by 1914, and also bad choices were made by inexperienced commanders. It makes one wonder had the British commanders really been clued up to the art of modern warfare maybe the war might not have been so disastrous in terms of casualties. ...read more.

Middle

The Germans had, however, stuck by this new technology and were duly rewarded, a single one was known to be able to kill hundreds of oncoming troops. this alone is damaging, enough to tip the balance of warfare, but with the Germans setting up a crossfire and the fact that the British were simply walking over "No man's land" - it was all too easy. Some may say that the lack of aerial reconnaissance, the fact that Germany was prepared (through their own aerial reconnaissance) or the ineffectiveness of the shelling to take out enemy fortifications , troops and guns (i don't think it was their place to use such an untested weapon and to place it on the lives of thousands of men when the soldiers were so inexperienced in using such a device) resulted in the poor performance of the generals but ultimately i think it comes down to a lack of respect for human life (to the extent that it can be held without putting oneself at a disadvantage in warfare) ...read more.

Conclusion

New weapons were being developed, like gas shells and bombs, which could kills masses depending on which way the wind was blowing. As the commanders were rookies in the art of modern warfare, they refused to place much trust in tanks and aircrafts, which if used effectively may have been a weapon that could enable them to break through enemy lines. To achieve the element of surprise was extremely hard in the First World War, as not only were the men watching no-mans land almost 24/7, all attacks normally followed, a long artillery bombardment, or were just generally predictable, and even when on no-mans land, it was not easy to traverse due to large craters in it due to artillery fire. Compared to previous wars Britain had been in, it is not like any of them, the warfare was completely different, and also Germany was an equal opponent to them, with the same developing technologies, and a bigger army. All in all, stalemate on the western front was a combination of the failure of the Schlieffen plan, the incompetence of commanders, the development of technology and the fact that they were two very equally matched sides. Stuart Butcher 11R ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    This source may be similar to Source H; however I don't think that it supports it. Source G states that the Germans lost the war because of the huge numbers lost, 'most experienced and most reliable officers and men were no longer in their places/this was marked as the heavy losses'.

  2. Captain Corelli's Mandolin - Chapter 63 is called 'Liberation.' How does de Bernieres ...

    There is an irony in Mandras' death as he set out to earn freedom with the communist group but he ends up with nothing 'Everything had come to nothing, everything was lost.' Mandras' death can be contrasted with the manner in which Arsenios was murdered.

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    The French lost over 200 soldiers in 12 days which was enough to show them that Plan 17 was not working so they abandoned it and regrouped to defend Paris from the advancing Germans. Once again the Germans had been slowed down and the Schlieffen plan was looking less likely to succeed.

  2. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    In our society the majority of us do not judge people in their colour. In the 60's and 70's however there was a lot of racial tension and rivalries between blacks and whites. Forrests simplicity allows him to see the only difference between black and whites is exactly the, the colour if their skin.

  1. The Breaking of Stalemate on the Western Front.

    He made it and on October 7th relief units fought their way to the battalion guided by him. For his efforts the private received the Distinguished Service Cross. Whittlesey was promoted to Lt.Colonel, and given the Medal of Honour. Of the 550 men that started out on the 2nd, 107 were killed, and only 194 were able to walk out.

  2. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    * Vickers machine gun: Crew of 6; 500 rounds/min; range: 2285; weighed 23kg. * Lewis gun: mobile & light: Crew: 2; weighed under 13kg; fired from shoulder. 600-700rpm. * Mortars: fired an explosive bomb, effective for long & medium distances - dugouts and earthworks * Hand grenades were part of trench warfare and used in close fighting.

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front in 1914 ? How was ...

    After this battle both sides started to try and out flank the other side. This caused the chase to the Channel. While they were try to out flank each other both sides dug in defensive positions to make sure they did not lose land.

  2. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    many issues that only a strong-minded, committed Chief of General Staff could deal with. Through Germany violating Belgian neutrality, the Great Power established itself as violent and forceful. This was confirmed by German historian, Gerhard Ritter who wrote in the 1960s that "Germany was therefore obliged by purely technical necessities

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work