• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime? It can be argued that the 1905 Revolution was little much more than outbreaks of rage with the intention of forcing concessions rather than revolutionary actions to overthrow the government, despite this however the revolution was still a large threat to the Tsardom, in defiance of this the Tsardom remained after 1905, not without its wounds however. Although the Tsar was not overthrown many commentators would say it was still an important foreshadowing event for the 1917 revolution. In every despotic regime the army is a key part, as one of the four pillars of Tsarist Russia they supported Nicholas during the revolution after returning from the Russo-Japanese war. Albeit the Army were not only loyal to him because they wholly supported the Tsardom, once and only once the army had received pay and changes to conditions of service it supported the Tsar fully, and were employed in putting down the revolution in the cities and later revolts in the countryside. He benefited as whole and their willingness to destroy the Soviets, in particular the St Petersburg soviet which was stormed and the leaders arrested, this way the Army stopped the Soviets before they could cause damage to the regime. ...read more.

Middle

One can say that if the revolution had a clear leader, who led with a clear message that all opposition agreed with, they could have overthrown the Tsar, albeit the army would have still stood in their way. For this reason it can be said that the disunity of the opposition was not as important as the loyalty of the Army, we cannot know if the revolution would have been successful because of the size, loyal and strength of the army. Furthermore, the Middle Classes who were formed via Witte?s industrialisation were scared of Anarchy; one former Marxist (Peter Struve) said ?Thank God for the Tsar who saved us from the people? after he opened his home to peasants who subsequently ruined his home. Many Middle Class liberals lost interest after the Manifesto as they felt that they had got what they wanted. As the Middle Classes repented revolutionary action and wanted to return to authority and control it meant Nicholas had disabled another opposition segment this considerably aided Nicholas, the new middle classes were the one group who appeared to know where to hit the Tsardom because they were brought together by the modernisation. ...read more.

Conclusion

This further pleased those against the Tsardom, as what they got from the manifesto was actually going to happen. In all, the Tsarist Regime had managed to survive the 1905 Revolution with its institutions intact, the brutal way via the army that the Tsar Supressed his people meant that he lost their already straining affection and respect which was replaced by fear alone. It is clear that without the army the Tsarist system would have disintegrated under the pressure applied by the albeit unorganised and somewhat disunited opposition. Although it can be argued that the disunited opposition were the overriding reason for the lack of revolutionary success, the revolt itself never truly had revolutionary characteristics, instead suggests Beryl Williams that it was sparked by sudden depression and war rather than fundamental economic causes and was more to do with freedom and dignity, than the policies of political groups or socialist parties whose activists were often seen as outsiders divorced from local concerns. Whereas previous to the revolution Nicholas? policies were that of a school boy during the revolt he acted carefully and wisely as to avoid a full scale revolution however it can be said that from giving in to the demands to the people sparked a new period of people power which resulted in the 1917 revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    They replaced ministers of the Duma with their 'friends' and this meant that there was nobody organizing food, fuel or other supplies. This was, therefore, a cause of the shortages on the home front. The transport system wasn't run properly and couldn't supply the factories, people and army at the same time.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    Higher education: Numbers of students did decrease from 113,000 in 1933 to 57,000 in 1939. This reflected the downgrading of academic education. The numbers increased after this because women began going to school. The government did not interfere very much in the universities.

  1. How did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    their main priority was to better their own living conditions and they sought after reform rather than take radical action against the Tsar which was reflected in their peaceful protest on Bloody Sunday. ...................It could be argues that the "1905 revolution was setting the scene" for the 1917 revolution, and

  2. To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II saved by making concessions in the 1905 ...

    The last Duma ostensibly worked but it was skewed in the favour of the Tsar because he flooded the Duma with his supporters. This took away the concept and aim of representing the Russian people and listening to what they wanted because his own supporters were in there - this gave him control over the concessions he gave.

  1. Why did Tsarism survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917?

    She allowed him to make key political decisions. The man was corrupt and used his power to spread corruption and get his friends important positions in the court. The Tsar was not the protector of the little people any more: Bloody Sunday had shattered that image.

  2. How important was the First World War to the collapse of the Tsarist regime?

    The Tsar had no real intention of resigning until his generals put forward the idea to him, because of the civil unrest in Petrograd, stating that if Nicholas remained Tsar then Russia would certainly lose the war. The first world war according to both Pipes and Kochan is important in

  1. The underlying causes of the 1905 Revolution in Russia were not political. Whatever else ...

    The deep-rooted socioeconomic and political problems made reforms the only way to save the dynasty, yet Nicholas II failed to bring the changes and reforms needed. Alexander III adopted the policy of ?autocracy, orthodoxy and nationalism? and refused to make any concession to liberalism.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime collapse in 1917?

    War One was logistically poor due to Nicholas?s inability to get his generals to follow his orders.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work