• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime? It can be argued that the 1905 Revolution was little much more than outbreaks of rage with the intention of forcing concessions rather than revolutionary actions to overthrow the government, despite this however the revolution was still a large threat to the Tsardom, in defiance of this the Tsardom remained after 1905, not without its wounds however. Although the Tsar was not overthrown many commentators would say it was still an important foreshadowing event for the 1917 revolution. In every despotic regime the army is a key part, as one of the four pillars of Tsarist Russia they supported Nicholas during the revolution after returning from the Russo-Japanese war. Albeit the Army were not only loyal to him because they wholly supported the Tsardom, once and only once the army had received pay and changes to conditions of service it supported the Tsar fully, and were employed in putting down the revolution in the cities and later revolts in the countryside. He benefited as whole and their willingness to destroy the Soviets, in particular the St Petersburg soviet which was stormed and the leaders arrested, this way the Army stopped the Soviets before they could cause damage to the regime. ...read more.


One can say that if the revolution had a clear leader, who led with a clear message that all opposition agreed with, they could have overthrown the Tsar, albeit the army would have still stood in their way. For this reason it can be said that the disunity of the opposition was not as important as the loyalty of the Army, we cannot know if the revolution would have been successful because of the size, loyal and strength of the army. Furthermore, the Middle Classes who were formed via Witte?s industrialisation were scared of Anarchy; one former Marxist (Peter Struve) said ?Thank God for the Tsar who saved us from the people? after he opened his home to peasants who subsequently ruined his home. Many Middle Class liberals lost interest after the Manifesto as they felt that they had got what they wanted. As the Middle Classes repented revolutionary action and wanted to return to authority and control it meant Nicholas had disabled another opposition segment this considerably aided Nicholas, the new middle classes were the one group who appeared to know where to hit the Tsardom because they were brought together by the modernisation. ...read more.


This further pleased those against the Tsardom, as what they got from the manifesto was actually going to happen. In all, the Tsarist Regime had managed to survive the 1905 Revolution with its institutions intact, the brutal way via the army that the Tsar Supressed his people meant that he lost their already straining affection and respect which was replaced by fear alone. It is clear that without the army the Tsarist system would have disintegrated under the pressure applied by the albeit unorganised and somewhat disunited opposition. Although it can be argued that the disunited opposition were the overriding reason for the lack of revolutionary success, the revolt itself never truly had revolutionary characteristics, instead suggests Beryl Williams that it was sparked by sudden depression and war rather than fundamental economic causes and was more to do with freedom and dignity, than the policies of political groups or socialist parties whose activists were often seen as outsiders divorced from local concerns. Whereas previous to the revolution Nicholas? policies were that of a school boy during the revolt he acted carefully and wisely as to avoid a full scale revolution however it can be said that from giving in to the demands to the people sparked a new period of people power which resulted in the 1917 revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    They lost faith in the Tsar and were ready to revolt. The Tsarist regime, therefore, collapsed partly because of its own actions. The First World War was a major factor in the collapse of the Tsarist regime. This was because it had effects on everyone that snowballed together to form a crisis in Russia.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    Parents were pressured to vote to end religious education. By 1939, all denominational schools had been abolished. Elite schools: Nazis used structures that were in place and then created elite schools. In 1933, Rust announced formation of National Political Institutes of Education for boys aged 10 to 18 to create future leaders.

  1. How did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    Both the Liberals and Peasants, two of the main opposition groups to the Tsar had readily taken to the idea of concessions and had willingly accepted the government's political and economic changes such as the October Manifesto proved that both these groups were never in favour of a revolution and

  2. Free essay

    What Were the Causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution Fail to ...

    Overall, the emancipation caused a big lack of devotion from nobility, peasants and the middle class towards the Tsar. As the political cartoon "The Release" implies, it also gave serfs a "taste" of freedom which once issued, would be extremely challenging to take away without protest.

  1. Was it the continuation of the First World War the main reason for the ...

    The failure of the offensive was very significant as it immediately led to an armed uprising in Petrograd in early July known as the July days. Although he Provisional Government survived this it showed that they were losing considerable support and even the moderate socialist leaders in the government were losing credibility with both the soldiers and the workers.

  2. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution? Why did the Revolution fail to ...

    The personal weaknesses of Nicholas II should also be considered as a cause for the 1905 Revolution. Nicholas had a tendency to place the needs of his family above those of his subjects. He also lacked the strength of character of his predecessors and the general view of historians is that he played a significant part in his own downfall.

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime collapse in 1917?

    War One was logistically poor due to Nicholas?s inability to get his generals to follow his orders.

  2. How important was the First World War to the collapse of the Tsarist regime?

    had their strong hold within the peasantry. This was important when it came to the Bolsheviks taking power. However, Pipes view was that the peasantry was onside with the Tsar, is greatly flawed. Pipes claims that the Tsar had a choice he could have easily have refused to not give

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work