• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the South lose the American Civil War?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the South lose the American Civil War? The Civil War, which began in 1861, came to an end on 13th May 1865 with a victory for the North. This however had not always been the case, as the South were victorious in many of the earlier battles of the war such as First Manassas and they appeared at first to have strong military leadership. Whilst it has been argued that the South's defeat was due to poor strategy within the military and the appointment of weak generals, many people also believe that there are other reasons for the South not winning the war. These include political leadership, foreign support, the supply of the army and war economics. Firstly, geography was in fact more advantageous for the South as they had a larger land mass than the North, with mountains and rivers which made battle easier for the people who knew the area, and harder for people who did not. The South also had a huge coastline, which made a blockade hard to enforce. However, the North was far more industrialised and wealthier than the South as well as having experience building railways and these factors outweighed their disadvantage due to the geography of where the battle was being fought. ...read more.


He was resilient, honest and delegated jobs well as well as keeping in touch with public opinion and spending time over his party organisation, which ensured continued support of the Republicans and an appearance of unity between them. Leadership was important to the outcome of the war, as whilst military experience was useful in making tactical decisions, Lincoln's political leadership turned out to be far more effective in maintaining morale and unity, something which Davis failed at. Military leadership on the other hand was something in which both sides had their successes and weaknesses. However some of the South's military errors could have cost them the war. For example, it has been argued that whilst the South was tactically good, their generals did not match the Union ones such as Grant and Sherman. Robert E. Lee has been criticised for losing the West-and therefore the war- for the Confederacy, whilst his successor Beauregard made plans not based on reality. Bragg argued with everyone whilst Joe Johnston refused to take chances. The South has also been criticised for misjudging situations by losing their bravest men in costly attacks early on. However, the Union made many mistakes also, especially in the Virginia theatre and their mistakes did actually give the Confederacy a chance at victory. ...read more.


However as there were more and more casualties and the war continued for much longer than anyone had expected, the South became at a disadvantage as they did not have the money to finance a long war. Although the North could not really afford it either, they had gold reserves and money from customs in trade as an income to help them so they did not have to resort to acts and taxation as the South did. The North also had a much stronger economy, which was able to recover from the inflation much better than the South. As the North was industrialised it was much easier for them to supply their troops with both food and weapons due to the railroads, whilst this was much harder for the South as many of their railways had been destroyed by Union forces. All of these factors show that the South was at such a disadvantage regarding their troops, supplies and finance that they had no chance of ever winning a war which continued for that amount of time. Even though the South appeared stronger in the early battles, the fact that the North was so industrialised with a good economy and larger population of men of military age secured their victory in the long run. Chloe Hunter Total number of words- 2897 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. "The main cause of the American civil war was undeniably slavery". Assess the ...

    to increase sectional divide because by carving free states out in the north and then slave states in the south, the result was going to be a north-south divide. Also this compromise was not intelligent enough to keep both sides happy.

  2. "Why did the nationalists lose the civil war?"

    The communists believed that revolution, according to Marx theory, should be led from the cities while a smaller group in the party believed that the key to revolution was in the country side, where most of the population lived, in the Jianxi province; this was led by Mao Zedong, a member of the CCP.

  1. To what extent can the Southerners be held responsible for the outbreak of the ...

    Many Northerners of the time would support the view that it was the Southern 'hot-headedness' that led to the outbreak of war. An example of this was shown on the Senate floor itself. In reaction to Senator Charles Sumner's (an abolitionist from Massachusetts)

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    There can be no doubt about the constitutionality of the Aoun government. Article 53 of the Lebanese constitution states that the president appoints the ministers, 'one of whom he chooses as prime minister'. The current premier does not have to resign; the president can dismiss him and appoint a new prime minister.

  1. To what extent was the Civil War the main factor in the Bolshevik

    Litovsk agreement which further infuriated them as it was perceived as showing weakness but the Bolsheviks believed it was the quick solution to the war. And the Greens had an influence on the Bolsheviks, especially in their Red Army as ill-discipline did occur and the Greens tried to use this

  2. Compare the Relative Importance of Political Leadership, Military Skill and Resources as reasons for ...

    Davis interfered too much in military matters, causing feuds to build up between his generals. The North in contrast was very much united, for a common cause. Lincoln had appointed opposition such as Democrates for members of his cabinet. This ensured that the Union had the support of the Democrate supporters and so united the nation.

  1. American Civil War (1861-1865).

    1864 On January 26, Confederate forces failed in their attempt to take Athens, Alabama. Confederate Calvary, numbering about 600 men, attacked Athens, held by about 100 Union troops, around 4:00AM on the morning of January 26, 1864. After a two-hour battle, the Confederates retreated.

  2. The American Civil War (1861-1865)

    All they ask, we could readily grant, if we thought Slavery right; all we ask, they could as readily grant, if they thought it wrong...Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations against us, nor frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the Government, nor of dungeons to ourselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work