• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did the Stalemate on the Western Front end?

Extracts from this document...


Why did the Stalemate on the Western Front end? Alex Lines The stalemate on the Western Front had been going on for several years, and the morale of the Allies was pretty low. Woodrow Wilson had Americans arriving however, but before any actually died, he offered peace to the Germans in an attempt to end the war before any did die. Ludendorff, however, had some new tactics in operation, and the Germans were winning. They now had the advantage of around 1,000,000 more men from the Eastern Front where the Russians had mutinied and overthrown their Royal family and become communists. He rejected what is known as 'The Fourteen Points', confident that the Germans could end the war soon. His plan involved sending 'Storm troopers', highly trained and equipped soldiers, as reinforcements during offensives. Inevitably, there were going to be some breakthroughs, and some halts. Instead of following the old tactics of sending reinforcements to help attack these areas, Ludendorff sent the storm troopers to capitalise on the breakthroughs, and then sweeping throughout the trenches. On the 21st of March, the Germans assaulted the Somme front, the weakest part of the Allied trench line. The new tactic was more successful than Ludendorff or anyone else could have hoped for. ...read more.


These attacks were meant to absorb Allied reserves, but instead they absorbed the reserves of the Germans. The Germans had lost over 1,000,000 men, and thereby lost their advantage in numbers, while the Americans were arriving constantly. This offensive proved to be Germany's last attack of the war. Counter-attacks soon followed, using the element of surprise. There was no previous bombardment, so the Germans weren't alerted in advance, and the Allies also used nearly 350 small Renault tanks. The Germans held them near Soissons, and checked other attacks near Rheims, preventing the salient from being cut off. The Germans then made a controlled withdraw from the salient. This was the turning point in 1918. The Allies then attacked at Amiens. The attack was planned in the utmost secrecy. Deceptions were created such as digging rear defence lines. The attack was made without any prior bombardment, with 430 tanks, 10 Canadian and Australian divisions, 4 British divisions, and 1 American division moving behind a 'creeping barrage'. Low flying aircraft were used to cover the noise of the tanks. The Germans were defeated by the tanks, and Allies made a 7 mile advance. Ludendorff called this day the 'black day of the German army' (8th August 1918). ...read more.


However, I believe another reason (though maybe not as important) for the stalemate's end was the arrival of the 'Tank'. It would have been terrifying for the Germans to see these machines coming towards them. The armour of the tanks also held against machine gun fire, so that these weapons of defence (which I have previously stated in another essay helped cause the stalemate) were countered. With infantry support, the tanks were almost unstoppable if used correctly. These tanks helped with the success of offensives. However, tanks were useless without large numbers of infantry in support, which with the arrival of the Americans, was easily made possible. The numbers of the Americans also meant that offensives were possible for the Allies, while the Germans, though they once held this advantage after the surrender of the Russians, didn't have enough men or equipment to mount many attacks. Combined with the new tactics and strategies of their generals, the Allies could really make their numbers count, while the Germans were forced to defend for most of the time, and they couldn't afford the casualties caused. So, in conclusion, I feel that the main reason for the breaking of the stalemate was the new strategies and tactics used by the Allies, but I also realise that the arrival of the Americans and the tanks were also important (though not as important). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How important was Haig's tactics on the Western Front in bringing an end to ...

    charge of millions of untrained men in a colder climate, with wetter and muddier land. Another considerable change was that this War was completely different to previous wars, in that the rules had changed - the advantage was with the defender, not the attacker.

  2. Account for the development of stalemate on the Western Front by the end of ...

    The time lag in sending and receiving orders generally allowed the defender to organise a counter attack, and stop the advance. The Allies reciprocated this misfortunate as they also faced similar communication problems.

  1. What Broke the Stalemate Stalemate is the word used to describe the situation on ...

    Now the Germans had no reserves to send after to assist his exhausted army. Also his rapid advance had ended up in making gigantic bulge in130 kilometres long and 65 kilometres wide. This left his forces exposed and vulnerable as they could be attacked from three sides.

  2. The years between 1914, when the front trench lines were established in 'the race ...

    Huge Losses and little land gain or land quickly won back. This is the repeating message to be drawn from the battles almost the entire way through the war, bought around by the effective defence mounted by the Germans. The truth is that the fighting tactics used on the Western

  1. Stalemate was on the western front for many years.

    They also sank passenger ships killing many Americans; Germany attacked many American ships using submarines. When the USA discovered that Germany had tried to ally with Mexico this was the last straw for the Americans and they declared war on Germany.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Schlieffen's expectation that Britain would not honour its alliance with Belgium was wrong. The BFE was sent to Mons where it helped to suspend the attack. The BFE was able to hold up the German army which cost the German's valuable time, ammunition and man power.

  1. The Breaking of Stalemate on the Western Front.

    Also the use of gas in the trench warfare side of things was devastating. At the start of the war it was only the Axis forces that used gas as an offensive weapon which came as a shock to the Allies and was thought of as a disgrace but by 1915 both forces were using gases such as mustard gas.

  2. How and why did a stalemate develop on the western front? Why did it ...

    This idea was fuelled by propaganda and the media, and soon it was a view held by all the German people now supporting the belief of a defensive war against the barbaric Russian's which also helped enrol the much needed support of the SPD in the vote for war credits

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work