• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why didn't Britain make a continental commitment between the wars? Explain

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why didn't Britain make a continental commitment between the wars? Explain After the First World War Britain was left considerably weaker than it was before; its economy was weakened, it had to pay back war debts and a large number of its working male population had either been killed or seriously injured. The same applied to France however; it was even worse for them because most of the fighting had taken place in France which meant that there was a vast amount of damage to buildings, and industry. Germany's situation was that many men had died; reducing the workforce, and because of the terms of the Treaty of Versailles they were economically and financially weak as well. The overall thought of European people after the war that it was important for another war to happen. It is commonly thought that there are nine main factors which made Britain not want to make a continental commitment between the wars, and these factors can be grouped according to domestic reasons and foreign reasons. The domestic reasons are as follows; the economy not being strong enough to enable Britain to uphold a commitment if a country were to go to war, fear of being dragged into another irrelevant war, social commitments and political suicide domestically. ...read more.

Middle

Overall social spending required forty per cent of government spending by 1930, of which thirty per cent was servicing the national debt. It is clear therefore that what money Britain did have was needed to be spent in Britain on in her empire. However this does not mean that it was impossible for Britain to make a continental commitment because of social reasons, she could have entered a commitment without any intentions of upholding the commitment if war was inevitable. People believe that it would have been political suicide for any government to have made a continental commitment for Britain at that time. Partially because of the fear factor; as I described above people were scared of being dragged into another irrelevant war after the suffering caused by the last war. The dislikes of the Treaty of Versailles because the public felt it to be too harsh, and wanted to change or reverse it, not make a commitment in Europe. Now I shall do the same for the foreign reasons; split them into impossible or did not want to. Imperial commitments mean that Britain had commitments to her empire, which constituted approximately one quarter of the land in the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

If Britain made a commitment to France then they would not change the treaty, which Britain wanted them to do. In conclusion, I feel that the main reason why Britain did not make a continental commitment in between the wars was the economy not being strong enough to enable Britain to uphold a commitment if a country were to go to war. I feel that this is the most important reason because If Britain did not have the money then they could not do something which would have a strong likelihood of leading the country into war they could not afford. Imperial commitments is second in my opinion because if Britain were to have entered a continental commitment they would have had to be able to go to war at any time. That would not have been possible, because there army was thinly spread over the world. Next is commitment to the League of Nations, because having a global commitment renders a European commitment pointless, however it would have been possible. Then I would put fear of being dragged into another irrelevant war as fourth, mainly because of the strong public opinion. After those four main reasons I would put; would make France even more assertive, balance of power, social commitments, dislike of Versailles and as least important political suicide. Thomas Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES

    Our industries must produce more weapons. Our army must be ready to fight within four years. Germany must be ready for war within four years. Q.2 Why might the evidence in SOURCE B make you think Hitler was not telling the truth in SOURCE A? Give three reasons.

  2. How Strong was Opposition to Continental Commitments in the 1920's

    Retrenchment meant that military commitments were simply too costly to consider. Retrenchment was justified by the employment of the Ten-Year rule which stated 'that the British Empire will not be engaged in and great war during the next ten years'.

  1. Africa and the role they played during both of the world wars.

    the time, Adolf Friedrich zu Mechlenburg, was not eager for war, because he was surrounded by the French to the east and British to the west and would not be able to defend it if it were attacked. The French and British wanted to capture Togoland.

  2. Arab-Israeli Wars.

    This war showed Israel's impressive military capability,it contributed to the consolidation of its regional and international standing.But Nasser did not take any lessons,he started another war.He rested on the advantage of an Egyptian and arab militay build up,a sufficiant measuere of Arab cooperation to permit the formation of a single arab around Israel and Israel's international isolation.

  1. World war ll one of the most deadliest and destructive wars.

    The second wave followed shortly and attacked everything the first wave had missed. Anti-aircraft fire was able to deter a third wave, but an incredible amount of damage had already happened. In only one hour, forty five minutes the Japanese air forces wrecked and capsized two battleships and three were resting on the bottom.

  2. Assess the reasons why Britain reduced its Empire between 1939 and 1964.

    Until some sort of unity could be achieved Indian aspirations would be frustrated, this frustration found outlet in increasing violence. This came to an end and then it was non-violence that now became the chief factor in the advance of Indian Nationalism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work