• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History of the Middle East?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History of the Middle East? The six- day war was very significant to the history of the Middle East. The war showed many things. It showed the power of the Israeli army. It showed that it would not just be one war but many. It showed continuing insecurity in the Middle East. It showed the Arab resistance to recognising the state of Israel as a state. All of these points shave lead to the current state of affairs in the Middle East. With each of these consequences the Middle East conflict continues. In short the six day war did not stop, in fact it increased, the threat of the Arab nations. Cause of the 6-day-war How did the six day war actually start? This war began back in the Suez crisis of 1956. In 1954 Egypt saw a military takeover. The government was overthrown by the General Nasser. Nasser was an extremely vicious figure. He wanted to be the most influential Arab leader. To do this he had to conquer Israel. By doing so he would gain respect and authority. However, if he did take over Israel he would have to ensure the production of an independent Palestinian state. By destroying Israel he would establish himself a permanent place in power as well as Arab history. ...read more.

Middle

Then there was east Jerusalem, previously an area belonging to the Palestinians, this was taken through pure urban warfare. This gave Israel a religious and physiological advantage over the Arabs, or so they thought. By keeping this eastern site Israel strengthened the Arab resistance to Israel. By taking the area which house one of the single most important mosques in Islam the Israelis fuelled the Islamic terrorist groups with more rage and anger. By doing so this continues the struggle between Israel and terrorism. Due to the taking of this land comes the term occupied territories. Israel had expected to gain the land and so had though of a settlement policy. Had they expected such resistance to their policy is uncertain? Israel has occupied these territories but it has not claimed them as Israel or returned them to their previous owner's this mean they are occupied territories. This means the people of these territories do not have Israeli rights and do not belong to any particular state. Only the Golan Heights and east Jerusalem have been claimed as part of Israel. The remaining three have not, officially, been claimed as part of Israel. This makes them occupied which means that they are under Israeli military rule but Israel does not want the Arab nationals to become Israeli citizens. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another outcome of the war was the Camp David Effect. After the Yom Kippur war the Egyptian general Sadat realised the need for peace and so with the help of the American president, Jimmy Carter, peace was agreed to between the Israeli leader and Sadat but only if the Sinai Peninsular was returned. This was agreed to. This so called idea of land for peace had worked. This is thought of as the stepping stone forward to peace. However the Arabs were furious at Sadat as he had broken the agreement of the 3 NOs and hence was assassinated in 1981 by an army officer. The 6 Day war has a huge significance to the current Arab Israeli situation. The six day war led to many things. Israel had believed that the 6 day war would be the last but they were very mistaken. They did not expect to spend the next 20 years fighting Intifadas and terrorism. They did not expect such agreements such as the 3 Nos. they did not expect to have to fight for their lives everyday. In short they had expected more Arab co-operation than they received. However, through the 6 day war and its consequences the Israeli government realised the potential in such deals as land for peace as with General Sadat. If peace is to be declared and remain in permanent existence then perhaps the land for peace formula is the one to use. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent is the oil crisis of 1973 a turning point in postwar ...

    5 star(s)

    Even the US, the economic super-power which dominated the global economy back then, was badly hit by the oil-crisis. There was a traumatic rise in the costs of manufacturing, transportation and food production.

  2. How far do you think Bloody Sunday was a turning point in the course ...

    The organisation's demands for reform, and the subsequent backlash by some in the Unionist majority, can be considered to have been one of the causes of the Troubles and violent conflict. One further argument that can be stated was a turning point in the course of the troubles of Northern

  1. WHAT WERE THE CAUSES OF THE YOM KIPPUR WAR OF 1973?

    Again he did this to put pressure and create a military front off between the two nations in hope that the other Arab nations would back him if another war broke out. This time the USA intervenes to ease pressure in the region but Nasser's clear intentions of war ends

  2. Indian History. To what extent did large dams built before 1990 fulfil Nehru's ambitions?

    a social displacement dilemma and caused widespread environmental destruction (Biswas & Tortajada, 2001, p. 11). Consequently, dams were somewhat detrimental to India and, more significantly, came to be viewed negatively by the Indian people. This lessening regard for large dams meant that, as is now consensually agreed, they failed to fulfil Nehru's second aim (Mehta, 2001, p.

  1. To What Extent Have The Attempts For A Palestinian State Been Blocked By The ...

    UNWRA called the construction of the wall in 2003 the 'greatest change in the [Palestinian] landscape since 1967'. Just like the other methods by the Israeli Government in the Occupied Territories, the 'Security Wall' goes against International law. The UN General Assembly passed resolution ES-10/13 which 'demands...Israel stop and reverse

  2. palestinians and israelis

    Also Golan Heights was taken from Syria. This has made the other Arab countries surrounding Israel still fight with the Israeli's to the very day.

  1. While surfing the channels on TV you might hear a lot of news about ...

    Anything new invented goes on a test in Israel as they are in a war every day of the year. The US gives money for Israel and in return they give the opportunity for new weapons to be tried. On the other hand Israel is always on the USA's side in world politics.

  2. To what extent did the reasons for and the nature of American and Soviet ...

    The USSR policy in the Middle-East was characterized in the beginning by aggression and Soviet expansionism as openly stated by Stalin, the supplied Egypt in its fight against Israel with arms and military equipment, as well as sending soviet experts to Egypt to offer their expertise.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work