• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WSPU. By the time war broke out in 1914, women's suffrage had still not been won. Some historians argue that this was due to the militant and ultimately violent action used by Emmeline Pankhurst's WSPU;

Extracts from this document...


By the time war broke out in 1914, women's suffrage had still not been won. Some historians argue that this was due to the militant and ultimately violent action used by Emmeline Pankhurst's WSPU; yet others believe that the WSPU's campaign played a major part in helping women finally acheive the vote on the same terms of men by 1928 as it was seen as a catalyst. Substantial sets of evidence - both long-term and short-term - can be used to back up both views. This shows that the WSPU's lack of success could prove that its tactics hindered the women's campaign, but was not fully responsible as there are other reasons. Emmeline chose to pioneer the WSPU movement as she felt that if women were relying on the NUWSS alone, there would be no further progress; she wanted women to make a bigger stand to attract more attention which she believed would help them win the vote. However, with the Union's motto already stating "Deeds, not words", this could have easily led the public - especially MPs - into thinking that the movement would use violence ('deeds') to acheive women's suffrage as opposed to 'words', i.e. compromising with the government. Despite up until 1912 the WSPU's action was considered not extremely violent, in Manchester - where the many-year campaign stemmed - many MPs amongst a good proportion of the public already saw the movement as militant, especially in comparison to that of the original NUWSS alongside smaller movements that had been forming ever since the 1860s. ...read more.


Alongside this, Sylvia furthermore had political views that were connected more with the NUWSS: '..in contrast to them she retained her interest in the labour movement.' [Sylvia Pankhurst, Wikipedia]. If the Pankhurst family could not even agree, then the people who witnessed this would be inclined not to. I feel that the period between 1912-14 showed the bitterness between the 'suffragettes' and the government at its height as a result of the WSPU's behaviour. Even though Emmeline Pankhurst had said that she 'allow(ed) my members to act...on their own free will' ['Votes for Women' Belinda Hollyer], members became so dedicated to Emmeline's cause that they became martyrs. This period would have been all the more ideal for the members of the WSPU to reduce its militant tacticts - for instance arson attacks - as, although the government had still not granted women's suffrage, evidence could suggest that they were somewhat more willing to compromise. For example, when martyrs refused to eat or drink when send to prison, 'the Cat and Mouse Act' was introduced to stop the perpetual force-feeding and allow members to recover. Nevertheless, the women were still willing to die for their cause, which not only made them look hysterical, but also ironically made them look even weaker than if they had simply not have been arrested in the first place. Lastly, although the WSPU did not just involve violence in their campaigns at first - for instance processions - it did attract large crowds, but this did not necessarily imply that they were supporters, or even sympathetic! ...read more.


It wasn't until a good few months into 1915 that a meeting was held for he and Emmeline to discuss the WSPU's action - progress was very slow. Even Queen Victoria was against the WSPU's notion, stating that women are '...what God intended, a helpmate for man, but with totally different duties and vocations.' It is believed that Queen Victoria never became in favour of the movement. In conclusion, after weighing up both sides of the argument, I believe that the perception that the militancy of the WSPU resulted in a greater hinderance to the women's struggle to gain the vote by 1914 to quite an extent. Indeed, 'militancy attracted publicity' [B. Whitefield, 'The Extension of the Franchice]; however, many other historians such as 'Liddington suggests that the militant acts 'only attracted public interest, never mass support'' [H.L. Smith, 'The British Women's Suffrage Campaign']. This is a key point to consider when regarding the impact of the WSPU's militancy during that period. Over 1,000 'suffragettes' were imprisoned in relation to the WSPU's demand for the extension on women's franchise. Even though on the one hand it attracted some sympathy, statistics like these prove that women were living up to their stereotype, and thus secured a justified argument that women belong in "seperate spheres": the men connected with politics, work and war; the women in their domestic sphere to raise their children and support their husbands. This hugely contentious issue is still as controversial as ever when debating whether the main reason for the WSPU's lack of success by 1914 was because of the movement's militancy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    Why, between 1903 and 1914, did the women's suffrage movement fail to achieve its ...

    Many universities admitted, apart for the old established universities at Oxford and Cambridge. The mould was being broken with a space of 50 years, all the women need was the vote, they had the law rights, the same education rights as men and many did better then men, but yet

  2. Do Historians agree that the WSPU was an elitist, anti-male organisation?

    The WSPU had also shown signs that they didn't care whose support they had in particular, as long they had the support (was the primary aim). This factor was supported when the WSPU had used 'military tactics', the result was that working class women turned their women on the organisation.

  1. It was the militant suffragette campaign, more then any other factor that led to ...

    The women were rewarded for their hard work with the vote. Consequently, in 1918 women over thirty got the vote, if they were householders or wives of householders or if they were women who had gone to university.

  2. How important were the Women's Suffrage Campaigns in the decision ot grant women the ...

    Bills were rejected, and in the 2nd Conciliation Bill, MPs voted against enfranchising women. Also, without having the support of Asquith, Prime Minister at the time, the Suffragists were never going to be able to gain women the vote before 1914.

  1. How Significant Was WW1 In Bringing About Votes For Some Women In 1918?

    The ways in which the pre- war campaign was carried out were largely as a result of the NUWSS and WSPU which were founded in 1897 and 1903 respectively. The suffragette campaign took place in a series of legal and illegal ways.

  2. Free essay

    Did the WSPU help or hinder the struggle for women's rights?

    This gives the impression that the WSPU and the NUWSS were very separate groups however on some mass rallies etc they in fact worked together. Early on in the WSPU campaign they raised the public profile of the Suffrage effort by holding large peaceful protests which were entirely legal.

  1. Compare the position of middle class and working class women between 1800 and 1914. ...

    The act was amended in 1882, meaning that women were able to control some "separate" property; however, none of the bills stated property could be a woman's "own," a point which illustrates the obvious prejudices which were still rife amongst the middle and upper class members of parliament.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question

    (mainly teaching) 1878 ? University of London opened degrees to women 1920 ? Women gain full membership of Oxford 1947 ? Women gain full membership of Cambridge The belief that well-educated women made better wives and mothers became more prevalent by the end of the 19th Century ? it also

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work