• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Actus Reus and Mens Rea.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Connor McCann Unit 24 P1 + P2 So what is Actus Reus? Actus Reus is the conduct of the accused (The defendant). It can be an act of commission or act of omission, and it must be a voluntary act that causes the damage or harm. It can also be a "state of affairs". 1. Commission or act of Omission: A person may incur criminal liability for failing to do that which the law requires him to do as much as by doing that which the law prohibits. The actus reus includes the state of affairs or circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence, together with the results or consequences (if any) ...read more.


1. An omission is only culpable if there is a common law or statutory duty to act: Generally there is no obligation on anyone to prevent harm or wrongdoing. Omissions are only criminal where a duty to act arises at common law or is imposed by statute. So what is Mens Rea? Mens Rea is an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and wilfulness. A fundamental principle of Criminal Law is that a crime consists of both a mental and a physical element. Mens rea, a person's awareness of the fact that his or her conduct is criminal, is the mental element, and actus reus, the act itself, is the physical element. ...read more.


Sometimes a statute creates criminal liability for the commission or omission of a particular act without designating a mens rea. These are called Strict Liability statutes. If such a statute is construed to purposely omit criminal intent, a person who commits the crime may be guilty even though he or she had no knowledge that his or her act was criminal and had no thought of committing a crime. All that is required under such statutes is that the act itself is voluntary, since involuntary acts are not criminal. Occasionally mens rea is used synonymously with the words general intent, although general intent is more commonly used to describe criminal liability when a defendant does not intend to bring about a particular result. Specific Intent, another term related to mens rea, describes a particular state of mind above and beyond what is generally required. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effective was the defence of intoxication?

    3 star(s)

    His conviction of arson was quashed by the Court of Appeal as the normal effect of the drug was merely sedative, they decided that the taking of the drug had not been reckless after taking into account all of the facts.

  2. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    Firstly, was there proximity between the parties, physical emotional or relying on expertise. Secondly, was the harm reasonably foreseeable, should the defendant have realised the likely hood of harming the claimant. In Bourhill v Young (1943) a motorcyclist had a crash and died, the aftermath was seen by a woman getting off the tram.

  1. Criminal offences are usually defined in terms of a guilty act (actus reus) and ...

    Often these cases do throw up questions as to whether or not the defendant has actus Reus. One way of describing situations where injuries, deaths or criminal consequences have a number of causes is to say that there is a 'chain of causation.'

  2. Liability in criminal law requires the prosecution to establish that the accused has caused ...

    The consequences to anyone striking a tyne or the guard at speed would have been severe, if not fatal". A point that could be risen here is that death may not have been the outcome if precautions had been taken.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    If the answer is yes as in R v White where but for putting cyanide in his mums drink would she have died then the D is not liable (she died of an unrelated cause). If the answer is no as in R v Pagett then the D is the cause.

  2. Omissions as actus reus

    A more modern example would be if a lifeguard left his post unattended to. His failure to leaving the post unattended could make him guilty of an offence if a swimmer had been injured or had drowned.

  1. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    Indeed, Hazel Genn has noted that victim surveys have tended to use an approach which Skogan has termed ?the events orientation?, which conceptualises crime as discrete incidents; she suggests that violent victimisation, such as prolonged and habitual domestic violence, may often be better conceptualised as a process, rather than as a series of discrete events.

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    As such, from this part of the definition, there could be two crimes; one count of fraud towards Prafal, and one towards Nina. Whilst the fraud with Nina has a definite duty, Prafal suffers no loss and is affected in no way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work