• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Actus Reus and Mens Rea.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Connor McCann Unit 24 P1 + P2 So what is Actus Reus? Actus Reus is the conduct of the accused (The defendant). It can be an act of commission or act of omission, and it must be a voluntary act that causes the damage or harm. It can also be a "state of affairs". 1. Commission or act of Omission: A person may incur criminal liability for failing to do that which the law requires him to do as much as by doing that which the law prohibits. The actus reus includes the state of affairs or circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence, together with the results or consequences (if any) ...read more.

Middle

1. An omission is only culpable if there is a common law or statutory duty to act: Generally there is no obligation on anyone to prevent harm or wrongdoing. Omissions are only criminal where a duty to act arises at common law or is imposed by statute. So what is Mens Rea? Mens Rea is an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and wilfulness. A fundamental principle of Criminal Law is that a crime consists of both a mental and a physical element. Mens rea, a person's awareness of the fact that his or her conduct is criminal, is the mental element, and actus reus, the act itself, is the physical element. ...read more.

Conclusion

Sometimes a statute creates criminal liability for the commission or omission of a particular act without designating a mens rea. These are called Strict Liability statutes. If such a statute is construed to purposely omit criminal intent, a person who commits the crime may be guilty even though he or she had no knowledge that his or her act was criminal and had no thought of committing a crime. All that is required under such statutes is that the act itself is voluntary, since involuntary acts are not criminal. Occasionally mens rea is used synonymously with the words general intent, although general intent is more commonly used to describe criminal liability when a defendant does not intend to bring about a particular result. Specific Intent, another term related to mens rea, describes a particular state of mind above and beyond what is generally required. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effective was the defence of intoxication?

    3 star(s)

    Lack of knowledge applies when D must not have known he was taking an intoxicating substance. This is illustrated in Allen (1998) who drinks homemade wine and does not realise the strength of it. He became extremely drunk and committed a serious sexual assault.

  2. Law - Unit 3 - Mock Exam Question

    She sued the deceased's estate for trauma and claimed she suffered a miscarriage because of this. She failed because there was no proximity between the two parties and the harm wasn't foreseeable. Thirdly, since Caparo v Dickman (1990) a further requirement was added: it must be 'in the interests of justice'.

  1. Criminal offences are usually defined in terms of a guilty act (actus reus) and ...

    Often these cases do throw up questions as to whether or not the defendant has actus Reus. One way of describing situations where injuries, deaths or criminal consequences have a number of causes is to say that there is a 'chain of causation.'

  2. Liability in criminal law requires the prosecution to establish that the accused has caused ...

    The consequences to anyone striking a tyne or the guard at speed would have been severe, if not fatal". A point that could be risen here is that death may not have been the outcome if precautions had been taken.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    Legal causation requires that the D is the operative and substantial cause of the result. D does not have to be the only cause but it must be more than minimal. In R v Smith whilst there was medical negligence it was held that the V died of the original

  2. Omissions as actus reus

    A more modern example would be if a lifeguard left his post unattended to. His failure to leaving the post unattended could make him guilty of an offence if a swimmer had been injured or had drowned.

  1. Critically discuss the Labour Governments record of crime control since coming to power in ...

    of retailers burgled in that year, compared with only 4% of households in that year, and thus shows that excluding commercial crime may be excluding a large proportion of overall crime.

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    that is proposed by Ormerod, "in some cases there will be obvious advantages in presenting the case under s.3 to focus the jury's attention on the existence of the duty rather than straining to persuade them of a relevant representation".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work