• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Alternative Dispute Resolution refers to methods of resolving disputes without going to court.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Alternative Dispute Resolution Sometimes the courts are not the most appropriate places to resolve civil disputes as they may not produce the most satisfactory outcome. Alternative Dispute Resolution refers to methods of resolving disputes without going to court. This has proved to be effective and a necessary alternative over the years. Resolving disputes via the fixed legal framework of court hearings may be inappropriate if parties prefer to be in control. The aggressive atmosphere in courts may divide the parties involved which may be detrimental if there is a need to sustain relationships. Judges may not have the technical knowledge required and would bring in expert witnesses. This incurs time and cost. Also, enforced solutions may not necessarily be the optimum solution that both parties would have preferred. Privacy is also an issue with court hearings as business disputes would be better kept private. Hence alternative dispute resolution has become increasingly popular as a necessary alternative to resolve disputes without the problems of court hearings. There are various forms of alternative dispute resolution. ...read more.

Middle

They process claims more quickly than civil courts. As panels play a more interventionist role rather than enforcing solutions, they may be more effective in reaching a satisfactory outcome for the case. However, appeals made may only be made on a point of law. In Yeboah v Crofton, the local government officer complained racial discrimination and the Employment Tribunal found in his favour. The decision was reversed by the Employment Appeal Tribunal but was restored by Court of Appeal. This is a weakness(ineffectiveness) of the tribunal system as litigants would have been able to appeal through the various methods provided in courts. The speed and informality may lead to poor decisions being made. The doctrine of precedent is not followed, hence it is unpredictable. This may also lead to suspicion of the fairness in tribunals. This shows that tribunals may not necessarily be the better alternative to courts. Another form of ADR is arbitration where parties agree to submit their claims and agree to accept the binding decision of an independent third party. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, mediators may overstep boundaries and take control of the decision making process. This loses the purpose of mediation and is ineffective as parties may prefer to make their own decision. In conciliation, there may be a disadvantage (weakness) of imbalance of powers between parties such as big vs small firms. Hence it may not necessarily be the better (most popular) forum for all disputes especially when one party is acting less voluntarily than the other. Negotiation is the cheapest and most private form of ADR where parties negotiate their terms. However, it may fail if lawyers are involved as they incur cost and may formalize the process. ADR processes claims more quickly than civil courts. The strict rules of precedent allow more flexibility into the system. They are less formal and less intimidating which ensures a high level of satisfaction. All methods of ADR are effective in their own ways and are able to overcome problems of court hearings. However, they do have their limitations such as decisions are hard to be enforced or lack of faith by people. Overall, it has become a necessary alternative. UK is moving towards ADR methods and Woolf reforms impose judge duties to encourage parties to use ADR and facilitate its use. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the name given to the process where parties in ...

    5 star(s)

    This judgment is legally binding on the parties. The relevant law on arbitration can be found in the Arbitration Act 1996. The agreement to go to arbitration can be made by the parties at any time. It can be written into a business contract by what is called a Scott

  2. Woolf Reforms

    The reforms put considerable emphasis on the use of out-of-court settlements, which can have the advantage of providing a quick end to the dispute, and a reduction in costs. An article in the Times in January 2005 said that 80% of personal injury cases are now being settled through mediation, decreasing the court's workload dramatically.

  1. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay

    Exceptions to this are Employment, Lands and mental health tribunals. Tribunals were mainly set up to prevent the overloading of courts, they are cheaper and quicker due to lack of legal representation, the panel is mixed and they are less formal than courts.

  2. Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after ...

    If the defendant is intending to defend the claim then they must submit the grounds of defence to the courts within 14 days. The court will then serve both you and the defendant with an N150 form, which is known as the 'Allocation Questionnaire' and contains particulars of the claim.

  1. Disputes - Is ADR always more appropriate or does attending court sometimes providing a ...

    The last type of ADR is the ARBITRATIONarbitration. It is the most formal type of ADR. And there are two types of arbitration, they are paper-based and face-to-face hearing. For the paper-based method, both parties in dispute complete written submissions to the arbitrator concerning their issues.

  2. A rule as to precedent (which any court lays down for itself) is not ...

    There is a limit to, however, what interpretation of cases can do. Sometimes, unwelcomed precedents are plain and clear, giving no room for discretion in application. For example, in the case of R v R, the issue for the court was whether under the law the defendant could rape the victim, when the victim was his wife.

  1. Penal Studies for Professional Practice

    Their possessions might also lost if the property is surrendered and storage arrangements have not been made (Homeless Organisation, 2001). Furthermore, Foreign National offenders face accommodation difficulties as many are not deported on release and hence are left to find their way single-handedly in an unfamiliar country (Singh, 2004).

  2. Tribunals are specialist judicial bodies which deals with disputes concerning particular areas of law.

    In the case of Peach Grey v Sommers, R claimes unfair dismissal from his employer. He sought to put pressure on relevant witnesses. The courts held that interference in a tribunal can amount to contempt of court. He was sent to prison.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work