• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyze the contribution of psychological contract literature to the understanding of OCB.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analyze the contribution of psychological contract literature to the understanding of OCB. The aim of this essay is to analyze the contribution of the psychological contract literature to the understanding of organizational citizenship behaviour ("OCB"). We shall argue that while the concept of psychological contract provides a useful framework for the understanding of why an employee may engage in OCB, its capacity to help managers adopt measures to foster greater levels of OCB among employees is considerably hindered as a result of the adoption by a majority of researchers of the definition proposed by Rousseau (1989, 1997) which is characterized by a focus on individuals' perceptions of promises made by organizations rather than on the actual content of these promises, as supposed they even exist. OCB has been defined by Organ (1988) as "behaviour that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization". The process through which an employee comes to engage in OCB has been described in the OCB literature has being strongly dependant upon individually-based perceptions of organizational procedural justice (Tepper, Lockhart and Hoobler 2001) ...read more.

Middle

Acknowledging that breach does not necessarily equate with violation (Morrison & Robinson 1997), it could be that the only situations in which employees highly involved in OCB would stop reciprocating their employer through OCB would be upon the occurrence of events of sufficient magnitude to cause both breach and violation. Support for this argument could be found in a study performed by Robinson & Rousseau (1994) that showed that employees who exhibit a strong attachment to their employers are more likely to react adversely to contract violations. The psychological contract framework therefore appears appropriate for the study of the causes explaining why an individual withdraw from OCB, although any explanations that is derived from it will generally be individual-specific, as it shall be discussed in the following paragraphs. It has been said that "the practical importance of OCBs is that they improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness by contributing to resource transformation, innovativeness and adaptability" (Organ 1988; Williams and Anderson 1991). It would appear however that the achievement of this objective is considerably impeded when the psychological contract framework is used to examine OCB. ...read more.

Conclusion

This situation, which stems mainly from the nebulosity regarding the identity of the co-contracting party to the psychological contract under Rousseau's definition (Guest 1998), thus also reduces the credibility of the conclusion achieved by Coyle-Shapiro and Kesler (2002). Assuming that it would be possible for a co-contracting party to measure an employee perception of its obligations and its degree of fulfilment, it remains that the proof of the bi-directionality of the reciprocal norms would be true only for this particular relation. Under this optic, the conclusion reached by Coyle-Shapiro and Kesler (2002) could still be of some usefulness in studying OCB aimed at other individuals inside an organization ("OCBI") but not for the study of OCB aimed directly at the organization ("OCBO"), unless a construct could be devised to integrate all the psychological contracts in which an employee is engaged. Consequently, though the psychological contract literature may contribute to explaining the reasons for which a particular employee may engage in OCB, the nature of the prevailing definition of psychological contract limits considerably its usefulness for organizations and managers searching for elements to devise strategies to sustain and increase OCB among a plurality of individuals. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    In more recent cases, it is suggested that if a promise is made in the spirit of genuine attempt to resolve difficulties which have arisen during

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    v East Midlands Housing Association 1981 An offer to pay a fixed price for building work is not accepted by a promise to do work for a variable price * Offer accepted by a reply which varies one of its terms below/by reply which intended to introduce entirely new terms14

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    under s 1(2), and the effect, in relation to the said benefit, of the circumstances giving rise to the frustration of the contract. BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt (no 2) [1982] 1 All ER 125. In December 1957 the Libyan Government granted the defendant a concession to explore for and extract oil from a specified area of Libya.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Promissory estoppel Promissory estoppel operates when a person, by his words or conduct, leads another to believe that a certain state of affairs exists. If the other person, relying on the belief, alters his position to his detriment, the first person is prevented from claiming later that a different state of affairs existed.

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    What is important is to ascertain the intention of the parties and the courts have developed two overlapping tests - the officious bystander test and the business efficacy test.

  2. Law of Contract - Promissory Estoppel

    relies on the other's promise of receiving only part payment as full satisfaction of the whole amount. It has now become the only true exception to the doctrine of consideration. The case of Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House, obiter by Lord Denning stated that promissory estoppel is invoked where one person (A)

  1. "It would be hard to over emphasise either the contribution made by implied terms ...

    On the other hand when the employee wants to change the contract the same has to be done, the reason for the employee wanting to change the contract would be to bring about improvements of pay, requesting additional holidays or even requesting to change from full time employment to part time employment due to domestic or social circumstances.

  2. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    I will evaluate the importance of implied terms by assessing the employment relationship in terms of the employee's obligations to the employer and the employer's obligations to the employee rather than providing a series of 'light weight' arguments. The employee's obligations to the employer include to the duty to obey

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work