• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

Extracts from this document...


Commercial Law Coursework This question is mainly concerned with the 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'. Sections 21-26 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 deal with the transfer of title. The general rule is that a person cannot give a better title than he himself possesses when he purports to sell goods. This is nest expressed by the legal maxim 'Nemo dat quod non habet' - no one gives who possesses not, that is to say, no person can give a greater title than that which they possess. Section 21(1) provides: 'subject to this Act, when goods are sold by a person who is not their owner and who does not sell them under the authority and consent of the owner, the buyer acquires no better title to the goods than the seller had...' The Act does not affect the provisions of the Factors Act or any enactment enabling the apparent owner of goods to dispose of them as if he were their true owner. At one time the only exception to this was sale in market overt, but in response to commercial pressures a steady flow of further exceptions have been introduced both by statute and common law, while the concept of market overt itself has been abolished. There are many exceptions to the nemo dat rule. The first one is Estoppel, this exception is\incorporated into s21(1) which ends: '...unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from denying the seller's authority to sell.' Section 21 can only operate to pass title when there has been a sale, if there is merely an agreement to sell then the doctrine of estoppel will not operate. ...read more.


is the owner of the car he does not have the right to sell the car because of the hire purchase terms. This is well illustrated by the leading case of Niblett v Confectioner's Materials (1921)1, where the plaintiffs bought tins of milk from the defendants. Some of the tins of milk were delivered bearing labels 'Nissly brand', which infringed the trademark of another manufacturer. That manufacturer persuaded Customs and Excise to impound the tins and the plaintiffs had to remove and destroy the labels, before they could get the tins back. It was held that the defendants were in breach of s12(1) because they did not have right to sell the tins in the condition in which they were, even though they owned them. This was clearly reasonable, as the plaintiffs had been left with a supply of unlabelled tins which would be difficult to dispose of. Similarly the defendant in Bishopsgate had no right to sell the car and is in breach of Section 12(1) of the Sale of Goods Act, which states: 'in a contract of sale, there is an implied condition on the part of the seller that in the case of a sale he has a right to sell the goods, and in the case of an agreement to sell he will have such a right at the time when the property is to pass.' The bona fide their party in the case can certainly recover, recover, by way of damages, any loss which he has suffered because of the breach. Further, the seller's obligation is stated to be a condition and the buyer is generally entitled to reject the goods when there is a breach of condition. ...read more.


Section 22(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 provided: 'where goods are sold in market overt, according to the usage of the market, the buyer acquires a good title to the goods, provided he buys them in good faith and without notice of any defect or want of title on the part of the seller.' However this exception had been removed by the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994. as the Bishops gate case was in 1948, this exception would then have been allowed and so the third part would have obtained a good title however even though this rule has been abolished the innocent third party in this case still had good title to the car as he bought it in good faith and without notice of the hire purchase agreement. So all in all in my opinion I believe the law has achieved an even balance between the respective parties as in the case the hire purchase company couldn't recover the car as the third party bought the car in good faith and obtained a good title, and since cars were sold in the market by private sale as well as by public auction, the car was sold to the third party "in market overt, according to the usage of the market," within the Sale of Goods Act 1893 s. 22 (1) and, therefore, the third party was able to give a good title to the defendant, with the result that the hire purchase company could not recover. Words: 735 1 [1921] 3 K.B. 387 2 [1923] 2 K.B. 500 3 [1954] 1 W.L.R. 1286 4 [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1332 5 [1965] 1 Q.B. 560 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. To advise Reggie, it is necessary to look at the law of adverse possession. ...

    he was open to reject it.14 The permission period given to Reggie from Amanda was until she demanded possession in the future. Thus, it is clear that adverse possession will start again at the termination of that period.15 However, in 1979, a new adverse possession time starts when Reggie extended

  2. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    It was really hard to see the true owner will succeed in recovering his own land though he was already done everything to prevent to time running. Based on the old law, the squatters will only can take over the land if the true owner did not realized and take any positive step to stop his land from adversely possess.

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    to ensure that the child's welfare is the paramount consideration in all decisions relating to adoption. The Act provides for adoption orders to be made in favour of single people, married couples and unmarried couples. But most importantly for the purpose of this discussion the Adoption and Children Act amends

  2. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 also empowers an authorising police officer to stop to stop and search any person or vehicle. They may do so if they have reasonable grounds to believe that serious violence may take place or if a person is carrying dangerous or offensive objects.

  1. Law case study

    This cannot be assumed that unmarried fathers are less responsible or even uninterested in their children. The European Convention of Human Rights, article 14, prohibits discrimination on such grounds as sex, race or color. Article 8, states that there should be no interference into private and family life except in

  2. Understanding Young People, Law and Order

    The neglect and abuse of children often progresses through several generations. The cycle of abuse, crime, and sociopathy keeps repeating itself. 2.1 Describe the consequences of two given crimes for: a) the victim If you have been the victim of a crime you may have doubts about whether to report what has happened to you.

  1. The Nature of Law in Society

    if he helped to end her life and sought the permission of the court for active euthanasia. The courts refused her request. This relates to euthanasia which is both morally and legally wrong, reinforcing the idea that certain views in society share the same moral and legal opinion.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    develop the torts of passing off even though there are several dissimilar pieces of legislation protecting image rights in rare situations. One reason for the lack of development in England is the principle of freedom of expression ? which has also developed problems regarding super injunctions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work