• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Contract Law - Discuss the significance of the precedent set in Shadwell v Shadwell

Extracts from this document...


Lucy Rimington Discuss the significance of the precedent set in Shadwell v Shadwell The issue in Shadwell v Shadwell was whether or an existing promise made to a third party could be good consideration for a new promise. It has long been accepted that where a party merely does something which he is already legally bound this can never amount to sufficient consideration for an entirely fresh agreement as in Collins v Godefroy and this rule has been used to cover where the duty has arisen under an existing contract as shown in the earlier dispute of Stilk v Myrick. In this case, 2 members of a ships crew deserted and the captain promised that the remaining crew members could share the 2 men's wages if they got the ship safely home, but he later refused to pay. It was held that the promise to pay was not binding on him as the sailors were bound by their exiting duties to cope with the normal contingencies of the voyage and this could include desertions. ...read more.


This ruling was highly controversial in law as it went against the presumption that there is no intention to enter legal commitment when in a social or family situation. The precedent set in this case was highly significant as the rule that it established was confirmed a year later in Scotson v Pegg. This ruling in this case also went in favour of the claimant, enforcing a promise made where there had been no fresh consideration offered, only the existing agreement with a third party. However this case may not be a direct application of the precedent, and it could be argued that this case would have had the same outcome with or without Shadwell v Shadwell due to the reasoning of business efficacy. The situation in Scotson v Pegg was a commercial one and it is evident form this and the later case of Glassbrook Bros. ...read more.


In conclusion, the significance or the precedent set in Shadwell v Shadwell is arguable. Many would argue that it was highly significant as it was the beginning of an exception to the basic rule that an existing duty cannot be held as good consideration for a fresh promise. However it can also be argues that Shadwell v Shadwell is the only case of it's type as the other cases that followed it may have been decided more for business efficacy reasons that because of the precedent set in Shadwell v Shadwell. On balance I would say that the precedent set in Shadwell v Shadwell is significant in the development of the law on consideration, but I would not say that the cases following it were decided in the way they were purely due to this precedent and the level of significance of Shadwell v Shadwell may be exaggerated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    He paid a deposit and was allowed to take the car away. He was dissatisfied with it and returned it to the dealer, saying he did not want it. The car was stolen from the dealer's premises and damaged. The plaintiffs, not having been told that the defendant had returned the car, signed the HP agreement.

  2. unit3 law of tort

    or of foreseen that it would result in Leonard's land being damaged. Ken may file for the defence of Volenti non fit injuria (malcom), absolute statutory authority, the nuisance was caused by a stranger and the Ken could not possibly have known of it. Contrast, however, Rennaway -v- Thompson (1980)


    The producers had engaged a substitute and when she appeared they refused her services. In Bettini v Gye [1876] 1 QB 183 a singer agreed to perform from March 30 to 13 July 1875 and to attend six days beforehand for rehearsals.

  2. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Ildar doesn't seem to have taken legal advice, which might be even justified given the short time during which the dispute occurred and there is nothing to suggest when Ildar wants to sue for his money, but the sooner he takes action the more likely he is to win.


    rival business or owner may win to prevent a former business owner setting up competition just down the road. The individual must show that they are taking legitimate measures to protect his position so courts need to do a balancing act for employer's right to protect legitimate business interests such as trade secrets, and employee's right to see profitable work.

  2. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    It was held that there was a contract because the acceptance was complete at the moment of its posting, even though the offer was not made by post. The acceptance is complete as soon as it is posted. Louise's case is the source of the 'Postal rule' that where post

  1. Contract Law

    Auction without a Reserve Even in an auction without a reserve, each bid represents an offer that could be accepted or rejected by the auctioneer. Tendering An advertisement for tenders will generally be the same as an advertisement for an auction which is akin to an invitation to treat.

  2. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    However, the court held against the offeror and offeree as from an objective viewpoint, there was no evidence of an acceptance from the nephew. But this can be disputed as here was evidence of the offeree instructing the auctioneer to withdraw the horse from the auction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work