• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Law of Contract - Law 103

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law of Contract Law 103 Assignment 1 ~ Seaburn Cycles Gemma Bolt 053047962 A contract is a legally binding enforceable agreement between two or more parties. Where an issue of a breach of contract arises in court, the court has to decide whether or not a contract has been made. To do this they must establish whether an offer has been made or whether it was simply an invitation to treat. If an offer has been made the courts must then look to establish whether there has been an acceptance. An offer is a statement of willingness by one party to enter into a contract on certain terms made with the intention that it shall become binding on acceptance. Whereas an invitation to treat is an expression of willingness to enter into negotiations which will eventually lead to a contract being formed. Acceptance is an unqualified expression of assent to the terms of the contract proposed by the offeror. The first thing to establish is whether an offer or an invitation to treat was made. In this situation, following the case of Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204, the initial advertisement in the newspaper would constitute an invitation to treat. ...read more.

Middle

David stated that if he did not hear anything from Jason he would assume he accepted the offer. However there is another rule in acceptance that acceptance of an offer will not be implied through mere silence. Also an offeror cannot impose a contractual obligation upon on offeree by stating that unless the offeree specifically rejects the offer, he will have accepted it. This was shown in the case of Felthouse v Bindley (1802) 11 CB (NS) 869. This means that Jason has not accepted the offer and is therefore not contractually bound to sell him the stock of bicycles. In this situation the only possible acceptance of the original offer would be by Martin meaning that Jason would only be contractually bound to sell Martin the stock of bicycles for �25,000. In addition to this Jason entered into a unilateral contract with Darren to carry out electrical work for �2,000. A unilateral contract is a contract whereby one party promises to pay the other a sum of money if that party completes a specified task. With a unilateral contract acceptance only takes place when the specified task has been fully completed. This was illustrated in the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. ...read more.

Conclusion

Due to this the contact would be void meaning Jason does not have to pay Peter the additional �500. This form of duress was illustrated in the case of North Ocean Shipping Co v Hyundai Construction Co (The Atlantic Baron) [1979] QB 705. Jason did however agree to the counter offer which would normally create a binding contract. However because the agreement was obtained as a result of duress the contact would not be valid meaning that Jason would not be contractually bound to Peter. In conclusion Jason would only be contractually bound to sell his stock of bicycles to Martin and pay �2,000 to Darren for completing all electrical work. Text Books 1. McKendrick, P. (2005) Contract Law) 6th edition, Hampshire, Palgrave, Macmillan Law Masters, pp32 - 53, 356 - 362. Case List 1. Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl [1983] 2 AC 34 2. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256 3. Entores v Miles Far East Corp. [1955] 2 QB 327 4. Felthouse v Bindley (1802) 11 CB (NS) 869 5. Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334 6. North Ocean Shipping Co v Hyundai Construction Co (The Atlantic Baron) [1979] QB 705 7. Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204 Articles 1. Article 19 of the Vienna Convention ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    Held it was an offer. Had agreed on a price and made a contract. Advertisement and Other Display * Advertisement for return of lost, information leading to arrest/conviction of the perpetrator of crime is offer3 * Those are the

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    It could not be said that this was spent in reliance on Reed, but the court said that there was nevertheless, no reason why such expenditure should not be recovered so long as it satisfied the rules on remoteness; if Reed could have been expected to realize that such losses

  1. Entores ltd V. Miles Far East Corperation [1955] 2 QB 327(CA)

    If for any reason the offeror did not get an acceptance, hence there is no contract. However, if the offeree taps out the message again and the offeror receives it then there is a contract. Overall Lord Birkett and Lord Parker have agreed with the decision above.

  2. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    that in the case of notice of withdrawal for the use of a ship by telex during business hours, withdrawal was effective when it was received on the telex machine, and that it was not necessary for the notice to have actually been read by a person.

  1. Offer and Acceptance

    The conviction was quashed as it was said that the advertisement was an invitation to treat. It is clear that when it comes to revocation, clearer authority is needed on the issue of revocation in unilateral contracts. Later on Sheena finds a pair of shoes labelled � 25.

  2. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    It can be implied into the employment contract the duty of the employer to take reasonable care for the safety of the employee33. But for this implication, an employee could still be under the 'master-slave' relationship compelling him to obey the employer's every instruction even at a detriment to his

  1. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    This will be so even if the letter accompanying the unsolicited goods states that the receiver will be liable to pay for the goods unless they are returned within a certain period. It should be noted that the need to communicate an acceptance may be waived as shown in the

  2. Contract Law, Scenario Assignment

    they didn?t receive the letter or it was delayed, it would mean a contract hadn?t been formed. When Brown?s accepted the offer, the sales manager should have immediately sent out a letter showing such an acceptance. However, the sales manager didn?t realise that Khan?s had another offer on the table

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work