• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the nature of legal and moral rules , and consider whether the law does and should reflect moral rules

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the nature of legal and moral rules. Consider whether the law does and should reflect moral rules. ( AQA A2 UNIT 6 - LAW AND MORALS ) A rule was defined by Twining and Miers as a general norm mandating conduct. For a legal rule, the breaking of rules will result in a punishment, such as a fine, prison or a criminal record. Legal rules are there to keep society in order. Moral rules, however, are sometimes not deliberately made, and are within the individual due to beliefs they have, or due to the fact they would feel guilty if they participated in the breaking of the rule. Sometimes moral rules come from religion. For example, Muslims can only eat meat if it Halal meat. Therefore, Muslim children will grow up with the idea that it is wrong to eat any other meat. Moral rules, if broken, have no punishment apart from the person's guilt. ...read more.

Middle

One example is the diversity of opinions on abortion. The Abortion Act 1967 made it legal for women to abort their unborn babies. Although it may be legal, many people disagree with abortion; this is therefore an example of when law conflicts with morals, as it is only upholding some of the countries morals. An example where most of the nation would agree to the law due to their own morals are the offences set down in the offences against the person's act 1861, and the laws on murder. However, the law doesn't reflect morals in some cases. One example is adultery. The Ten Commandments rule that adultery should not be committed, and most people would agree, but there is no law in the UK against committing adultery anymore. Another way in which law reflects morals is the law on euthanasia. A lot of people believe euthanasia is wrong, as everyone has a right to live. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, in R v Brown, some homosexual sadomasochists caused injury to each other's genitals, but all had consented to this injury. This wasn't held to be acceptable, as the law on assault had been breached. Devlin would agree with this decision, as he stated that judges should still preserve common morality. Others in society would not have agreed with the actions in the case of Brown, which shows Devlins argument. From this discussion we can see that there is a diversity of morals through the UK, and the law reflects some of these morals, for example the moral of not killing is reflected with murder; but not others, for example , adultery and abortion are not crimes, but most people would see these as wrong. We can also see that there are two sides to the argument of whether law should reflect morality or whether it should be a separate thing, AND Professor Hart and Professor Devlin both have valid points. Different individuals will agree with different points of view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Free essay

    Examine the relationship between law and morals. Consider the extent to which the law ...

    may try and persuade or even rebuke people that don't follow 'the trend', possible resulting in complete social breakdown. Morality differs from person to person, from one social group to another and changes with time. For example attitudes towards single parents used to be very negative whereas nowadays it seems commonplace.

  2. Law and Morality. Within the justice system there is a genuine relationship between law ...

    Moreover, the Wolfenden Committee had used Mill's liberal view when looking at the laws surrounding prostitution and homosexuality. He believed that the laws on prostitution and homosexuality should be more liberal and he argued that they should not constitute as crimes.

  1. Discuss the meaning of 'justice'. Consider the extent to which justice is achieved in ...

    To each according to his merits - people get what they deserve. To each according to his rank - people may enjoy privileges according to status. To each according to hs legal entitlement - people receive what the law says they should.

  2. Law and Morals

    as a means to create sexual awareness, something that many may consider to be morally right. There are also legal issues, such as parking laws and building without permission, that do not give society as a whole moral concern, and this is also true of making and selling/buying pirate DVDs.

  1. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    Consequently they challenged the fairness of the UK proceedings in the European Court of Human Rights, which was successful, as the defendants had not been given a fair trial. Overall, conditional fee arrangements have more disadvantages tied to them, however it has meant that there is a greater access to

  2. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    The criminal process in the English legal system has been repeatedly criticised. A topic that has been regularly discussed is plea bargaining. The report of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice examined plea bargaining amongst various aspects of the criminal process.

  1. Law and Morals

    violations they are not seen as immoral, whilst immoral acts like adultery are not a criminal offence under the British Law. There are various theories on what relationship of law and morals should be. The first theory I have talked about above of St Thomas Aquinas.

  2. English legal system

    Sedley LJ then made a statement regarding section 77(6) of the County Courts Act 19849. The barrister for the appellants then went on to say that the breach in question in this case was very serious and it would be unreasonable to make an order in very exceptional cases.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work