• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The right to a fair trial is one of the key points established within the human rights act 1998.

Extracts from this document...


The right to a fair trial is one of the key points established within the human rights act 1998. ECHR Article 6 (1) & (3)(c), in summary, states that everyone charged with a criminal offence is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law and has the right: 'to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require'. Article 6 is one of the most significant convention articles and the one that is most frequently found to be violated.1 The far-reaching powers contained in new legislation have led the Government to derogate from Article 5 of the ECHR just over a year after the HRA came into force2. This decision flies in the face of the Government's commitment to human rights and has proved difficult to justify, as I will show in this assignment. Since the beginning of the 21st century the British Government has introduced two new pieces of legislation to deal with the now worldwide threat of terrorism. The Terrorism Act 2000 is the primary piece of UK counter-terrorist legislation and it has introduced new measures in the fight against terrorism. Passed by Parliament on 20 July 2000, it came into force on 19 February 2001 in response to the changing threat from international terrorism, and replaced the previous temporary anti-terrorism legislation that dealt primarily with Northern Ireland. Following on from this the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act (ATCSA) ...read more.


In relation to the anti-terrorism act 2001 the main point concerning this essay permits the detention of suspected terrorists without trial, potentially indefinitely19. The Act is grafted onto immigration legislation, and therefore only applies to non-UK nationals. The legislation allowing detention without trial is contained in Part IV (Immigration and Asylum) of the Act. In order to protect the act from challenge the government derogated in respect of Article 5(1) (f)20 of the European Convention on Human Rights as mentioned previously. The legislation has been challenged in the courts under the Human Rights Act, and at first instance was found to be incompatible with Article 14 (the right to non-discrimination in respect of Convention rights) because it discriminated between nationals and non-nationals. However, the Court of Appeal, on policy grounds, overturned this decision21. Currently in the United Kingdom there are ten people held without charge in Belmarsh prison that have been there for over two years. One judge Lord Goldsmith, acting for the government in the recent appeal, defended the use of indefinite detention, describing it as 'a legitimate and appropriate response to protect the human rights of the suspected international terrorists'.22 The argument against this is, 'that in a democracy it is unacceptable to lock up potentially innocent people without trial or without any indication when, if ever, they are going to be released. It is doubly unacceptable for a democracy committed to the principles of equality and anti-discrimination to single out foreign nationals when it is not prepared to apply the same measures to its own nationals.' 23 In this case of the presumed terrorists almost all of article 6 has been destroyed. ...read more.


In the case of Murray v UK42 it was accepted that Article 6 also applies at the stage of police interrogations, and not just when charges are brought against the detainee. One way the government has got around article 6 is the requirement of audio recording of police interrogations. This safeguard, coupled with the possibility of video recording, has helped narrow the room for abuse and minimise the possibility of Article 343 issues being raised. Of the more than 7,000 people detained in Britain under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, the vast majority were released without charge and only a small fraction have ever been charged with terrorism related offences. Almost without exception these people could have been arrested under the ordinary criminal law. The lack of effective sanctions on states breaking their treaty obligations is the most substantial and insoluble deficiency in the treaty system. This is revealed most starkly in derogation situations where government interests in protecting internal institutions or preserving a particular regime make it impervious to adverse publicity, the key enforcement of international organs.44 The UK's derogation from the HRA has resulted in the infringement of a person's right to a fair trial through the terrorism act 2000. The government has been able to hold people for over two years without sanctions, it has set up courts where there is no need for the accused to be there and there is no reason for a judge to give reasoning about his decision. The Newton report, Liberty and Amnesty International as well as many others all have protested against these courts that violate Article 6 of the HRA and the holding of the accused terrorists. The presumption of innocence has also been wiped away since the introduction of these acts and only the ECHR can pressure the government to decide to act otherwise. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Jury Essay

    different Life experiences to the usual stereotypical member of the judicial system, who are believed to be white males from a middle class background, who attended private schooling. It could also be argued that the jury could sympathize with the both parties is the case as the jury would have local knowledge and understanding of their areas problems.

  2. Free essay

    How effective are domestic and international legal measures in dealing with human trafficking?

    clarity to investigators, prosecutors, and governments about what elements of slavery need to be proved in order to secure convictions. Two, the Court has embraced a modern understanding of how the crime of slavery operates. Three, the Court has found that consent to come to Australia for prostitution is not equal to consent to enslavement or the conditions of slavery'.

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    child was born or conceived at the time when the parents were validly married. However a child born after a marriage had ended by either divorce or death, recognised in Knowles v Knowles12 is also held as legitimate. It was recognised originally, and previously discussed that the father had the exclusive legal power over his legitimate child.

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    It must be pointed out that individuals cannot bring proceedings against another individual. Stone makes the following point on this matter: "It would not be possible to use Art 8, for instance, which recognises a right of privacy, directly against the press intrusions.

  1. To advise Reggie, it is necessary to look at the law of adverse possession. ...

    This had contradicted term (a) in their 'licence agreements'. Also, in this case, the three friends' and Lilian's relationship did not fall within the 'Facchini categories' but was of landlord and tenant and not that of licensor and licensee.40 If Lilian had decided to take the refresher course in aromatherapy, it may have been a

  2. To what extent do you think these aims have been (or will be) facilitated ...

    27 4 National Provincial Bank Ltd. v. Ainsworth [1965] Lord Wilberforce "Before a right or an interest can be admitted into the category of property, it must be definable, identifiable by third parties, capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability".

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    Judges and advocate general are chosen from among persons of indisputable independence who fulfil the conditions required fro the holding of the highest judicial office in their respective countries or who are jurists of recognised competence. Alternatives to the ordinary civil courts As we have seen, criminal problems are dealt with by the state through criminal courts.

  2. "The key provisions of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 are inconsistent, incoherent and unfair." ...

    In the case of the provisions relating to children the offences are not just limited to blood relations but recognise the different and more flexible structure of modern families and therefore extend to adoptive children and other non-blood relatives. The law relating to the sexual exploitation of children, in particular

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work