• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The theory of tenure requires that all land that is held for any estate shall be held of a lord. It was on this premise that the relationship of landlord and tenant

Extracts from this document...


INTRODUCTION This paper discusses in detail the statement that The theory of tenure requires that all land that is held for any estate shall be held of a lord. It was on this premise that the relationship of landlord and tenant for a term of years that had no place in the old feudal land law was brought into the category of estates and came to be based upon tenure. A lease is construed as both a contract and an estate. Today, it is the only form of tenure that retains any practical importance.1 With the aid of barons, William the Duke of Normandy invaded and conquered England in 1066. He became William I. All land belonged to the crown. One quarter was treated by William as personal property and the rest was leased out under strict conditions. The country was split into manors which were given to Barons by the King. In return the Baron and his Knights had to serve on the royal Grand Council, pay various dues and provide the King with military service when required. The Baron kept as much land as he wished for his own use, then distributed the rest among his Knights who were thereby bound to meet the Baron's military needs, when either he or the King called for them. The knights in turn allocated sections of their lands to villeins (serfs) who had to provide free labour and food and service whenever, with or without warning, it was demanded. ...read more.


The consideration in the contract is usually but not always the payment of rent. Rent is regarded as a contractual payment for the use of the land. Many have defined the word "rent" and it is taken to include the performance of services. In Knights case (1588) 5 Co.Rep.54b at 55a. it was settled that there can be a valid lease even though no rent is payable. The consideration furnished by the tenant may include * the payment of a premium; remission of interest on a debt owed to him by the landlord; * his undertaking to perform the covenants in the lease; * the mere acceptance of the lease by the tenant. Like a contract, a lease may be frustrated. In National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd (1981) AC.A675 In Hussein v Mehlman (1992) 2 E.G.L.R 87 the tenant treated the lease as at an end because of landlord's failure to carry out repairing obligations. Furthermore, the courts are willing to imply terms in the lease as they do for contracts. The court will set aside a lease induced by fraud of one of the parties as was held in the case of Killick v Roberts(1991) 1 W.L.R. 1146. Under the Statute of Frauds 1677 a contract for the sale or other disposition of land or any interest in land is unenforceable unless evidenced in writing or by a sufficient act of part performance. ...read more.


What the subject owns is a series of rights and duties in relation to that piece of land. Understandably lawyers have given a name to the interest in land which the subject holds, and that name is an 'estate in land'. So the land belongs to the Crown and the subject owns an estate in the land, which gives him certain rights in relation to it. Thus a freehold owner is said to 'hold land of the Crown'. At one time it was usual for an estate owner to render services to the Crown in return for the right to use the land, but these services are now performed only in the rarest of cases and tend to be regarded as an honor rather than as an obligation (for example, the duty to supply a pair of gloves for the monarch to wear at his coronation). The relationship between the freehold owner and the Crown is called 'tenure' (from the Latin word 'tenere' which means 'to hold'). At one time there were many types of freehold tenure, classified according to the nature of the services to be rendered by the estate owner. Today only one of these forms of tenure remains and that is called 'free and common socage'. For all practical purposes the doctrine of tenure has little modern significance, and most freehold owners are completely unaware of their tenurial relationship with the Crown. In the case of leasehold property, the relationship between a landlord and his tenant is also one of tenure, although it usually involves the payment of rent rather than the performance of services. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    In more recent cases, it is suggested that if a promise is made in the spirit of genuine attempt to resolve difficulties which have arisen during

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    * The offer also will not be terminated if the guarantor expressly provided that it can only be terminated by notice given by guarantor even if the bank knows about the death of him. Bradbury v Morgan (1862) JM Leigh requested Bradbury & Co to give credit to HJ Leigh, his brother.

  1. Restrictive Covenants

    as is the case in Bluebell Apparel v. Dickson. Courts have also set aside UK wide covenants for smaller businesses too (Dumbarton Steamboat Co. v. Macfarlane) The multi-national nature of the company leads one to believe that the a worldwide covenant would be possible, however significant sections of the globe (Canada, South America, Africa)

  2. Ian, an investment broker, wasapproached by Victor who asked him whether he should invest ...

    M.A 1967 which gives the courts the discretion. It's opinion that measure of damages under S2(2) may be lower than S2(1) and should be limited to an indemnity. Treitel and Cheschires views. But if the courts refuses to awarded damages then Victor may apply for an indemnity.

  1. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Ann asking her to seek legal advice, the decision in Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV v. Burch [1997] . Even if there is no undue influence, certainly there will be misrepresentation by Derek and still he will be guilty as the same rules apply to misrepresentation.


    Although not freed from the contract. It just means that innocent party can keep anything belonging to the contract breaker until they carry out side of agreement. (Property, goods, money) for e.g. a solicitor can refuse to hand over documents till client pays bill or a hotel can refuse to hand over luggage till guest pays bill.

  1. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    is something so obvious that it goes without saying so that if, while the partied were making their bargain, an officious bystander were to suggest some express provision for it in their agreement, they would testily suppress him with a common "Oh of course!"".

  2. Legal Studies Assess Two

    That's all I have to say'. Even though the amount of evidence against him convinced the jury that he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, if it ever did come to light that he was not guilty, this would not have been a just outcome for him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work