Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7

2D and 3D Sequences Project Plan of Investigation

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

2D and 3D Sequences Project Plan of Investigation In this experiment I am going to require the following: A calculator A pencil A pen Variety of sources of information Paper Ruler In this investigation I have been asked to find out how many squares would be needed to make up a certain pattern according to its sequence. The pattern is shown on the front page. In this investigation I hope to find a formula which could be used to find out the number of squares needed to build the pattern at any sequential position. Firstly I will break the problem down into simple steps to begin with and go into more detail to explain my solutions. I will illustrate fully any methods I should use and explain how I applied them to this certain problem. I will firstly carry out this experiment on a 2D pattern and then extend my investigation to 3D. The Number of Squares in Each Sequence I have achieved the following information by drawing out the pattern and extending upon it. Seq. no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 No. Of cubes 1 5 13 25 41 61 85 113 I am going to use this next method to see if I can work out some sort of pattern: Sequence Calculations Answer 1 =1 1 2 2(1)+3 5 3 2(1+3)+5 13 4 2(1+3+5)+7 25 5 2(1+3+5+7)+9 41 6 2(1+3+5+7+9)+11 61 7 2(1+3+5+7+9+11)+13 85 8 2(1+3+5+7+9+11+13)+15 113 9 2(1+3+5+7+9+11+13+15)

Middle

The method in which Iused to look for any patterns in the sequences. I will use this to prove the number of squares given by the equation is correct. As shown below: 2(1+3+5+7+9+11+13+15+17+19+21+23+25+27+29+31+33+35+37) + 39 = 761 I feel this proves the equation fully. Using the Difference Method to Find an Equation to Establish the Number of Squares in a 3D Version of the Pattern Pos.in seq. 0 1 2 3 4 5 No.of squar. -1 1 7 25 63 129 1st differ. 2 6 18 38 66 2nd differ. 4 12 20 28 36 3rd differ. 8 8 8 8 So therefore we get the equation; an + bn2 + cn + d We already know the values of 'n' (position in sequence) in the equation so now we have to find out the values of a, b, c, and d. If n = 0 then d = -1 and if n = 1 then d = 1 I can now get rid of d from the equation to make it easier to find the rest of the values. I will will take n = 2 to do this in the following way: 1st calculation _ 8a + 4b + 2c + d a + b + c +d 7a + 3b + c D will always be added to each side of the equation. 2nd 8a + 4b + 2c = 8 = 4a + 2b + c = 4 2 So then n = 2 8a + 4b + 2c = 8 = 4a + 2b +

Conclusion

Firstly I have deciferred that the equation used in the 2D pattern was a quadratic. This can be proven through the fact that the 2nd difference was a constant, a necessary element of any quadratic and also the fact that the first value has to be squared. This can also be proved by illustrating the equation on the graph, creating a curve. I have also established that the top triangular half of the 2D pattern always turns out to be a square number. If we now look at the 3D pattern, the equation I achieved for it has turned out to a cubic equation. This can be proven through the constant, again a necessary characteristic of any cubic equation and also the fact that its 1st value must be cubed and its second squared. If we drew a graph we would get a ccurved graph in which the line falls steeply, levels off and then falls again. The Differentiation Method developed by Jean Holderness played a very important role in this investigation. It helped us to gain knowledge of any pattern and anything that would help in the invetigation, giving us our constant, but most importantly it gave us the equation on which to base our solutions. It was: an2 + bn + c This proved very helpful. To find our equation we then substituted in different values which we could find in our differentiation table. I have concluded that both the equations proved to be very successful. Therefore the equations are: For the 2D pattern the equation is; 2n2 - 2n + 1 For the 3D pattern the equation is; _(n) - 2n2 + 2Y(n) - 1

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics

  1. Functions Coursework - A2 Maths

    Following is part of the graph y=x3-7x-4; I have taken y to be equal to f(x). The pink line represents the Newton-Iteration. The next approximation is given by x2 = x1 - (f(x1)/(f /( x1)) This works because the gradient of the line drawn is f /( x1).

  2. Maths - Investigate how many people can be carried in each type of vessel.

    => y (HA-BG)(AF-DC) - y (AE-DB)(IA-CG) = (AF-DC)(AL-JG) - (AK-DJ)(IA-CG) y = [(AF-DC)(AL-JG) - (AK-DJ)(IA-CG)] / [(HA-BG)(AF-DC) - (AE-DB)(IA-CG)] Since we now have the formula of 'y' and 'z' we could simple take any of the three formulas we started with and simply substitute them into the equation and rearrange to produce a formula for 'x'.

  1. Mathematical Investigation

    Based on the observation that varying values of "a" only changes the amplitude, therefore it can be easily conjectured that the waves are stretched vertically, while the X-intercepts remain the same, according to |a|. Part II Investigate the graphs of y=sin (bx)

  2. Sequences and series investigation

    Pos.in seq. 1 2 3 4 5 6 No.of squar. (c) 1 5 13 25 41 61 1st differ. (a+b) 0 4 8 12 16 20 2nd differ. (2a) 4 4 4 4 4 We can now use the equation an2 + bn + c 'n' indicating the position in the sequence.

  1. Investigate the relationships between the lengths of the 3 sides of the right angled ...

    4a + 2b + c = 13 -eqn2 - a + b + c = 5 -eqn1 3a + b = 8 -eqn5 Equation 4 - Equation 5 I am doing this to eliminate B and finally work out what A is worth.

  2. The open box problem

    and 135 so I will now construct another graph to zoom in more on the line. The graph shows that the value of x is definitely 2, and that the maximum volume is about 128, to verify this the box on the left of the graph says what the value of y is (volume)

  1. Numerical Method (Maths Investigation)

    Upper Bound = 1.512135 Lower Bound = 1.512125 f(Upper Bound) = 6.88810-7 f(Lower Bound) = -1.47810-10 Error Bound = 1.512135 - 1.512125 = 0.000005 Hence, Approximation Value = 1.51213 0.000005 FAILURE OF NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD Newton-Raphson method can be counted as one of the best method to calculate approximation value, however, "When there's ADVANTAGE, there's DISADVANTAGE".

  2. Numerical Solutions of Equations.

    = 0.49269, y is +0.000005. When x = (0.492685 - 0.000005) = 0.49268, y is -0.000037. This change of sign means the root lies between this two values for x. Problems with decimal search Although decimal search was successful in finding this particular root there are problems with the method in certain situations that result in no root being detected.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.