• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Solving the equation of 0 = 3x^5 - 3x + 1 using different methods

Extracts from this document...


Solving the equation of   0 = 3x^5 - 3x + 1 using different methods. This is to compare all three methods to find out which is best. To be fair, the same root will be calculated by all three methods.

Method:Decimal Search/Change of sign

        The equation, 0 = 3x^5 – 3x + 1, will be solved using the method Decimal Search/Change of Sign.


I have

...read more.













































...read more.


The Rearrangement method would, in my opinion, be the quickest. This is because the equation just has to be rearranged, and then the numbers substituted into the equation. It also has only a few calculations (5), normally slightly more than the Newton Raphson method.

Overall, I think, without the aid of a computer, the Rearrangement method would be the quickest and most efficient way of calculating the value of the function. The Newton Raphson method would be second as there are less calculations to do, even though the method is harder. Decimal Search/Change of Sign would come last as there are too many calculations to do.

However, if a computer was available, any method would be suitable, if the correct software was available. This is because they all take roughly the same amount of time.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. The downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will diverge away.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    It is clear enough that this works for all the values of n previously proven, but now I will attempt to try and prove this for fractional and negative powers to prove that this formula is correct. If there is irrefutable evidence to support this gradient function for xn, I will investigate different values of "a" in axn-1.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    But DW just 0.14, below than 2, which means not good. Figure 6(a) and (b) shows the same conclusion as DW. Thus, another factor which called error correction should be added to the consumption. As in the short run consumption will not equal the desired proportion of income.

  2. MEI numerical Methods

    however if K is a negative number then it has a positive correlation. As proved above there is no geometric progression either. The best method: One way to conclude which is the best method is to find out the problems in each of the formula.

  1. Experimentally calculating the wavelength of an He-Ne laser by means of diffraction gratings

    second/third fringes for the 600 lines/mm diffraction grating could not be found because they were too far away to practically calculate. Qualitative Data: As the diffraction grating spacing increases, the distance between the central beam and the first/second/third order fringes seems to decrease.

  2. Investigate the relationships between the lengths of the 3 sides of the right angled ...

    = 12 -eqn1 3a + b = 18 -eqn5 Equation 4 - Equation 5 I am doing this to eliminate B and finally work out what A is worth. 5a + b = 26 -eqn4 - 3a + b = 18 -eqn5 2a = 8 A = 8/2 A =

  1. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    Algebraically this can be donated as [f(?) + f(?+h)](h/2). The length of the next trapezium in figure 1.1 is [f(2) + f(3)](h/2); similarly in algebraic terms [f(?+h) + f(?????h?]??h???? As a result the total area in figure 1.1 can be given as follows: [f(?) + f(?+h)](h/2) + [f(?+h) + f(?????h?]?h??????[f(?+2h) + f(?????h?]?h??? + [f(?+3h) + f(?????h?]?h?????? [f(??????[f(??h)

  2. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    or -0.54113([-1, 0]) or 0.82868([0, 1]). Hence g?(root) in the interval [0, 1]= -1.4617 As g?(x) < -1, we can expect that the iteration to diverge away from the root in a cobweb fashion. This can be shown on the graph above, and therefore this must be correct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work