• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Solving the equation of 0 = 3x^5 - 3x + 1 using different methods

Extracts from this document...


Solving the equation of   0 = 3x^5 - 3x + 1 using different methods. This is to compare all three methods to find out which is best. To be fair, the same root will be calculated by all three methods.

Method:Decimal Search/Change of sign

        The equation, 0 = 3x^5 – 3x + 1, will be solved using the method Decimal Search/Change of Sign.


I have

...read more.













































...read more.


The Rearrangement method would, in my opinion, be the quickest. This is because the equation just has to be rearranged, and then the numbers substituted into the equation. It also has only a few calculations (5), normally slightly more than the Newton Raphson method.

Overall, I think, without the aid of a computer, the Rearrangement method would be the quickest and most efficient way of calculating the value of the function. The Newton Raphson method would be second as there are less calculations to do, even though the method is harder. Decimal Search/Change of Sign would come last as there are too many calculations to do.

However, if a computer was available, any method would be suitable, if the correct software was available. This is because they all take roughly the same amount of time.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    The chance of this happening is quite high. As for the speed of convergence, it would be slower that Newton Raphson because of the extra time needed to re-arrange the equation but it is faster than Decimal search. With the use of Excel, it is very easy to enter the x = g(x)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    x + h - x h = h (5x4 +10x�h + 10x�h + 5xh� + h4) = 5x4 +10x�h + 10x�h + 5xh� + h4 h Every term apart from 5x4 contains an h term, leaving every term to tend to 0.

  1. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    also the amount I have chosen to work with in my calculations. Due to its manipulative ability Excel makes the handling of data very easy and saves an enormous amount of time. This is due to the fact that you don't need to calculate everything; once the formula is entered

  2. MEI numerical Methods

    To use fix point iteration we do rearrange f(x) = 0, to G(x) = x. We then do G(x1), and so on; this is called a recurrence relation. By doing this, most of the time the sequence gets closer to the final answer thus it converges.

  1. Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    The simplest method of this is graphical although full statistical tests are included in the appendix. The top of figure 2 shows a very strong correlation between the actual consumption figures and the ones derived from our equation; however the bottom half still shows some large residual errors, especially in

  2. Investigate the relationships between the lengths of the 3 sides of the right angled ...

    = an� + bn + c F (n) = 2n� + 2n Try n = 1 F (1) = 2 x 1� + 2 x 1 = 2 + 2 = 4 Try n = 2 F (2) = 2 x 2� + 2 x 2 = 8 + 4 = 12 Try n = 100 F (100)

  1. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    =0 Examining g?(x) graphically y=x so gradient 1 We can see 0<g?(x)<1 Root to f(x) =0 Since 0<g?(x)< 1 we expect to get staircase convergence and it is a success staircase and the result is the same as the expectations. A rearrangement of the same equation is applied in a situation where the

  2. Newton Raphson Method for Solving 6x3+7x2-9x-7=0

    = -0.1797 f '(x2) = 17.246 x3 = -1.6573 3 x3 = -1.6573 f(x3) = -0.16987 f '(x3) = 17.237 X4 = -1.6573 Solution bounds = (-1.64725? x ?-1.64735). Failure attempt for Newton Raphson Failure attempt for the equation 1.7ln(x-3)+3=0 This is the graph of y=6x3+7x2-9x-7.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work