• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Solving the equation of 0 = 3x^5 - 3x + 1 using different methods

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Solving the equation of   0 = 3x^5 - 3x + 1 using different methods. This is to compare all three methods to find out which is best. To be fair, the same root will be calculated by all three methods.

Method:Decimal Search/Change of sign

        The equation, 0 = 3x^5 – 3x + 1, will be solved using the method Decimal Search/Change of Sign.

image00.png

I have

...read more.

Middle

x

y

0.33

0.021740618

0.331

0.018919587

0.332

0.016100733

0.333

0.013284074

0.334

0.010469631

0.335

0.007657423

0.336

0.004847471

0.337

0.002039795

0.338

-0.000765585

0.339

-0.003568648

0.34

-0.006369373

x

y

0.3377

7.57868E-05

0.33771

4.77377E-05

0.33772

1.96889E-05

0.33773

-8.35975E-06

0.33774

-3.64081E-05

0.33775

-6.44563E-05

0.33776

-9.25042E-05

0.33777

-0.000120552

0.33778

...read more.

Conclusion

The Rearrangement method would, in my opinion, be the quickest. This is because the equation just has to be rearranged, and then the numbers substituted into the equation. It also has only a few calculations (5), normally slightly more than the Newton Raphson method.

Overall, I think, without the aid of a computer, the Rearrangement method would be the quickest and most efficient way of calculating the value of the function. The Newton Raphson method would be second as there are less calculations to do, even though the method is harder. Decimal Search/Change of Sign would come last as there are too many calculations to do.

However, if a computer was available, any method would be suitable, if the correct software was available. This is because they all take roughly the same amount of time.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. The downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the root but it will diverge away.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    x� = Gradient of PQ = (x+h) � - x� = x� + 2hx + h� - x� = 2hx + h� = 2x+h = 2x x +h-x h h x^n = Gradient of PQ = (x+h)n - xn = xn + (nx n-1)

  1. MEI numerical Methods

    for the secant method, this should give us the constant K if it is first order convergence, sadly it doesn't. The final(green) values should all be approximately the same. However they clearly are not, this means the secant method does not have first order convergence.

  2. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    integral as we know the exact value is between that of Tn and Mn. Technology: Most of this coursework will be carried out using Microsoft Excel; an electronic spreadsheet program used for organizing and manipulating data. The program is capable of working accurately up to 16 decimals places; this is

  1. The Gradient Fraction

    Now, I will solve the following graphs using the Increment method: * y=x3 * y=2x3 * y=x4 'y=x3' solved by the 'Increment Method' x -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 x3 -64 -27 -8 -1 0 1 8 27 64 y -64 -27 -8 -1 0 1

  2. maths pure

    Using the same method, the second root, approximated by b, can be calculated. Iteration Xn+1 b1 2.28571 b2 2.23764 b3 2.23607 b4 2.23607 b5 2.23607 This iteration converges very quickly and the root is 2.23607 to 5 dp. Error Bounds Error bounds can be found by showing a change of sign for f(x).

  1. C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

    Comparisons Now, I am going to compare all the 3 methods I have used in the coursework, including change of signs method, Newton Raphson method and x=g(x) method. In order to do so, I will first use the equation which was used in change of signs, x³+3x²–3=0, and use the Newton Raphson method and x=g(x)

  2. Newton Raphson Method for Solving 6x3+7x2-9x-7=0

    The first guess was x = 1. The second value is when the tangent of the curve passes the x-axis at -0.4. The difference between -1 and -0.4 shows the accuracy increased to 60%. The rate of convergence is fast at this point.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work