• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Anti-Anti-Anti-PC; A Critique of Political Correctness amongst the Right

Extracts from this document...


Anti-Anti-Anti-PC; A Critique of Political Correctness amongst the Right According to George Orwell, "All language is political". Indeed as if we ever needed a better example, a new and more progressive era has been entered upon; where conservatives have introduced a catchy two word phrase to undermine a world supposedly committed to egalitarianism and respect for the dignity and welfare of others. Political Correctness (or PC) is a concept, while having been around for some centuries, recently finding immense support - but for the wrong reasons. What irks me is the fact that the term - now turned derogatory - has been used to manipulate a generation of progressive minds leaving them blind to the hypocrisy the prominent users of the term, themselves, derive. Where the manipulation achieves its success is in simplification; simplification of an issue into mere black and white. Political Correctness apparently is sweeping a world caught up in righting its wrongs. The concept of righting your wrongs seems to be a positive force; but then so does the term Political correctness. Where the phrase seems to glitch though is when suddenly justice is hypocrisy, and compassion is an attack on freedoms of speech. Yes; if you've noticed the parallel with Orwellian Newspeak. ...read more.


Consider economics, where freedom is so dispensable it's handed out as an entr´┐Że, side dish, or even dessert. Economic freedom at its face seems to be something we all would like to strive to. The truth is, economic freedom means the violation of freedoms for millions. In Oldspeak Economic Freedom is Exploitation. De-regulation is Corporate Anarchy. Political Correctness is that sugar-coating used by the right to promote a matrix reality; Political Correctness is that stain used by the right to disorient consciousness. Explode Your Dogmas The stain is spread heaviest on egalitarian pursuits and as iterated before; it achieves success through simplification. Indeed we've always had that need to rationalise our own history, social policies, and ethnic bigotries into "something blame free and racially neutral whenever possible, and ethnocentrically [only] when it suits our interests." The double standards people talk about are manifest in the institutionalised, rigid, context ignorant thinking of their own. Context ignorance stems from our need for comfort; to allow our minds to be put at ease. This is why I have appraisal for a curriculum that puts its focus on the history of oppression and exploitation. Why? Because, to put it simply, that is what our history consists of; in understanding our history, we may then understand where our future should take us. ...read more.


Feminism was about equal pay and workplace conditions, and to a large extent it still is. But there is more that remains undone. It evolves to now counter attitudes, stereotypes, and the same exploitation manipulated in more covert ways. Yes, we have come a long way especially in the past 50 years. But that does not mean we should not continue to evolve for the next 50. The aberration of the politically correct is just another hurdle cast on progress. We've seen it before; in Pompeius' disinformation campaign against Caesar; in the Church's period of the Holy Inquisition; and in the West's 'Red Army/Domino Effect' theory. Psychological warfare is indeed not a very new phenomenon. It has just recently become manifest on a more subtle but equally more dangerous level. The use of the phrase Political Correctness is to promote disunity among those who need most to unite. Its success is paramount on the incestuous spindle of incomprehensible hypocrisy. Transcend . . . George Orwell posited that if thought can corrupt language, then so too can language corrupt thought. Fruitful education, promotes fruitful thought. Our guide comes from this education. Only then do we have the ability to critique inconsistencies from Conservatives through to Anarchists; it is through this questioning of what is thrown at us, and by whom, that we can transcend the context ignorant and finally . . . understand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Aspects of misguided policies or inappropriate or counterproductive methods of policy implementation may be brought to the attention of the majority. This kind of learning raises the probability that corrective single-loop or double-loop learning will ensue, for organizational actions that incorporate inputs from the minority are likely to be much more consensual than otherwise.

  2. Marxism, Idealism and Nationalism

    Nationalism can be linked to the situation that occurred in Egypt in 1981 when religious fundamentalist assassinated Anwar Sadat, the president of Egypt at the time. During 1978 and 1979 Israel and Egypt negotiated the Camp David accords, which resulted in the largest Arab state quitting the coalition against Israel

  1. Compare and Contrast the Classical Liberal position with the Conservative position on the issue ...

    is very rational that some legal drugs such as alcohol and tobacco are more harmful then some illegal drugs (Penington, 1999). The Classical Liberals believe that drug use is a personal individual issue and recreational drug use should be legalized with restriction of access to minors (Help End Marijuana Prohibition, 2006).

  2. What is the meaning of the distinction between Left and Right in western political ...

    in social affairs were quite left wing, albeit that they did not believe in collectivism. If you look at the many ideas that we now describe as left or right ideas or ideologies fall under the guises of thoughts expressed in the works of many political thinkers throughout history.

  1. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    everyone would live happy ever after, however there are a number of flaws in this system and one of them is the problem with property. If there is no private property and everything belongs to everyone how will people decide who uses what?

  2. What is Cultural Studies? What does it do? And does it Matter?

    For Foucault, ideology is always expressed in discourse, that is, in texts produced as knowledge about a certain topic or area. One way Althusser describes Ideology is, 'A system (with its own logic and rigour) of representations (images, myths, ideas or concepts)'

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    closely tied to Yeltsin), which lost 21 members, and the Agrarian Party, which gained 18. Several prominent politicians left the parties that had sponsored their candidacies, including Nikolai Travkin, who left the Democratic Party that he had founded (White, Rose, and McAllister 1997, 184-85).

  2. Are concepts of left and right meaningful outside the European context

    Today, the left is traditionally defined as broadly socialist, in favour of a sizeable welfare state and supportive of trade unions and workers' rights, while the right is fiscally conservative, concerned with minimising the size of government and promoting maximal individual economic freedom.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work