• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Anti-Anti-Anti-PC; A Critique of Political Correctness amongst the Right

Extracts from this document...


Anti-Anti-Anti-PC; A Critique of Political Correctness amongst the Right According to George Orwell, "All language is political". Indeed as if we ever needed a better example, a new and more progressive era has been entered upon; where conservatives have introduced a catchy two word phrase to undermine a world supposedly committed to egalitarianism and respect for the dignity and welfare of others. Political Correctness (or PC) is a concept, while having been around for some centuries, recently finding immense support - but for the wrong reasons. What irks me is the fact that the term - now turned derogatory - has been used to manipulate a generation of progressive minds leaving them blind to the hypocrisy the prominent users of the term, themselves, derive. Where the manipulation achieves its success is in simplification; simplification of an issue into mere black and white. Political Correctness apparently is sweeping a world caught up in righting its wrongs. The concept of righting your wrongs seems to be a positive force; but then so does the term Political correctness. Where the phrase seems to glitch though is when suddenly justice is hypocrisy, and compassion is an attack on freedoms of speech. Yes; if you've noticed the parallel with Orwellian Newspeak. ...read more.


Consider economics, where freedom is so dispensable it's handed out as an entr´┐Że, side dish, or even dessert. Economic freedom at its face seems to be something we all would like to strive to. The truth is, economic freedom means the violation of freedoms for millions. In Oldspeak Economic Freedom is Exploitation. De-regulation is Corporate Anarchy. Political Correctness is that sugar-coating used by the right to promote a matrix reality; Political Correctness is that stain used by the right to disorient consciousness. Explode Your Dogmas The stain is spread heaviest on egalitarian pursuits and as iterated before; it achieves success through simplification. Indeed we've always had that need to rationalise our own history, social policies, and ethnic bigotries into "something blame free and racially neutral whenever possible, and ethnocentrically [only] when it suits our interests." The double standards people talk about are manifest in the institutionalised, rigid, context ignorant thinking of their own. Context ignorance stems from our need for comfort; to allow our minds to be put at ease. This is why I have appraisal for a curriculum that puts its focus on the history of oppression and exploitation. Why? Because, to put it simply, that is what our history consists of; in understanding our history, we may then understand where our future should take us. ...read more.


Feminism was about equal pay and workplace conditions, and to a large extent it still is. But there is more that remains undone. It evolves to now counter attitudes, stereotypes, and the same exploitation manipulated in more covert ways. Yes, we have come a long way especially in the past 50 years. But that does not mean we should not continue to evolve for the next 50. The aberration of the politically correct is just another hurdle cast on progress. We've seen it before; in Pompeius' disinformation campaign against Caesar; in the Church's period of the Holy Inquisition; and in the West's 'Red Army/Domino Effect' theory. Psychological warfare is indeed not a very new phenomenon. It has just recently become manifest on a more subtle but equally more dangerous level. The use of the phrase Political Correctness is to promote disunity among those who need most to unite. Its success is paramount on the incestuous spindle of incomprehensible hypocrisy. Transcend . . . George Orwell posited that if thought can corrupt language, then so too can language corrupt thought. Fruitful education, promotes fruitful thought. Our guide comes from this education. Only then do we have the ability to critique inconsistencies from Conservatives through to Anarchists; it is through this questioning of what is thrown at us, and by whom, that we can transcend the context ignorant and finally . . . understand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the Classical Liberal position with the Conservative position on the issue ...

    People who come from the Clasical Liberal ideology embrace "individual rights, private property and a laissez-faire economy, a government that exists to protect the liberty of each individual from others, and a consitution that protects individual autonomy from governmental power" (Heywood, 2003; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    While the Unity Party had firmly hitched itself to Putin's star, the reverse was not true, since he had actually endorsed both the Unity Party and the Union of Right Forces Party in the Duma race. Third, Yeltsin's resignation in January was a smart strategic move because it moved the campaign back from June to March.

  1. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    For example, if two people would want the same car on the same day who gets it?

  2. Are concepts of left and right meaningful outside the European context

    Additionally, the left is generally seen as promoting social liberalism, the separation of church and state, (in the past) divorce and the option to terminate a pregnancy. The right, conversely, is broadly morally conservative, often religious and for stricter controls on issues like abortion.

  1. Analysis of two articles arguing for the importance of literary aestheticism as an adjunct ...

    A noted literary critic, Levine does not in any way discount the value of cultural studies, and sympathizes with those who seek to overcome oppressive political dominance. However, the possibility that aestheticism may be entirely eschewed in favor of extrinsic concerns frightens him, and he feels compelled to "rescue it from its potential disappearance into culture and politics" (380).

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    For instance, not only are public budgets controlled from outside the organizations that depend on these allocations, in the short and medium terms, they can be modified and redirected only minimally, and at the margins. This circumstance is one reason why political scientists who wish to identify the most powerful

  1. What is Cultural Studies? What does it do? And does it Matter?

    he's familiar with developments in all of these; he is a 'poststructrualist theorist', and is in category all his own. Foucault is FOUCAULT: the founder of a school of thought, a way of thinking about how the world operates. Foucault is primarily interested in examining how discourse, which is his

  2. Marxism, Idealism and Nationalism

    Notice that the state is part of the powerless superstructure. Marx believed that the state did not exercise ultimate societal power, but it was the private institutions that made up the power in the economic base. The bourgeois represented the base of material interest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work