• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are political parties better understood as reflections of ‘social cleavages’, or products of strategic action?

Extracts from this document...


Are political parties better understood as reflections of 'social cleavages', or products of strategic action? As famously expressed by the 19th century French politician and writer Tocqueville, political parties in democratic countries are "the only powerful persons who aspire to rule the state"i. Thus, political scientists and politicians have been keen on examining patterns of support that political parties receive from significant social groupings. The concept of cleavages has become a vital concept in political science when trying to understand voting behaviour and party systems. Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan (1967) described the development of European party systems in terms of the historical conditions of national and socio-economic developmentii. According to Lipset and Rokkan's work, party preferences are strongly influenced by the social groups to which voters belong. Parties arise, then, in response to the demands of these voters. On the other hand, the changes that took place in the European party systems since the Second World War have led many political scientists such as Kirchheimer, Dalton to view political parties as products of an interaction of social base and strategic action. Kirchheimer's 'catch-all party model' aimed to show the new intention of European political parties to attract as many voters as they can, giving less importance to the hitherto decisive social structuresiii. This essay will argue that although political parties across Western Europe were formed on the basis of social cleavages, in time strategic action has become a crucial factor in understanding political parties. ...read more.


Next, this essay will look at different European party systems in which there are parties based around the same social base but with different political outlooks depending upon the various strategic actions. For example, Von Beyme tells us that in spite of their similar origins of the party systems of Sweden and Norway, in the 1970's the Socialist Party in Norway and the Swedish Centre Party took similar stands in the environment and atomic energy issuesxix. First, liberal parties date from the later part of the nineteenth century, however they have undergone profound changes since they were formed. They originally sought to represent the interests of the bourgeois against the landowners. And mostly in Southern Europe, liberalism was an expression of the radical forces against clerical pressuresxx. Therefore, liberalism was a product of the national and industrial revolutions. Today, liberal parties advocate permissive social policies such as separation of church and state. They are situated at the left or centre of the political spectrum. Some liberal parties have been very supportive for state intervention in economy and national context has been very important in deciding this. For example, policy spaces of the liberal parties in Norway and Finland in 1984, show that there is a good deal of difference between their positions on the left-right scale. The liberal party in Norway (V), which has embraced limited forms of interventionism is scaled 4 whereas Finnish Liberal Party LKP is scaled 5.6 on the left-right scale whereby 0 represents extreme left and 9 represents extreme rightxxi. ...read more.


xiv Mark N Franklin, 1996. Electoral Participation, in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard Niemi, Pippa Noris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, (London: Sage Publications), p. 220. xv Kitschelt, H. (1997). 'European Party Systems: Continuity and Change' in Rhodes, Heywood and Wright (eds.), Developments in West European Politics, (London: Macmillan), p. 33. xvi Lipset, S. M. And Stein Rokkan, (1990). 'Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments' in Peter Mair, ed. The West European Party System. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 112. xvii Ibid., p.117. xviiiLane, J-E. and S. Ersson (1999). Politics and Society in Western Europe, (London: Sage), p.78. xix Von Beyme, K. (1985). Political Parties in Western Democracies. (Aldershot: Gower Publishing), p. 136. xx Lane, J-E. and S. Ersson (1999). Politics and Society in Western Europe, (London: Sage), p. 83-84. xxi Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996). Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp.266. xxiiWare, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p.31. xxiii Ibid. xxiv Ibid., p.31. xxv Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996).Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp. 19-20. xxvi Gallagher, M., Laver M. and Peter Mair(eds.), (1995). Representative Government in Modern Europe (2nd ed.) (New York : McGraw-Hill), p.183. xxvii Ibid, p.185. xxviii Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996).Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp.27. xxix Gallagher, M., Laver M. and Peter Mair(eds.), (1995). Representative Government in Modern Europe (2nd ed.) (New York : McGraw-Hill), p. 193. xxx Ware, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp.36-37. xxxi Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996).Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp.148-149. xxxii Ibid., pp. 70-71. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the UK and US political parties and their party systems

    During an extended stay in power, a dominant party can shape society through its policies. During the Thatcher era, health, education, the state ownership of industry etc. were all massively changed and re-shaped. Society changed as a result of these political changes and this can only be done by a party having an extended stay in office.

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    faculties, and that dignity is an essential component of happiness, so that any pleasure conflicting with it is rejected. Problems: What's the evidence that people well acquainted with both higher and lower pleasures prefer the former? Is the appeal to dignity in appropriate?

  1. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    and that religion is merely an ideological framework to create an illusory happiness we are presented with a problem. How then do we explain the practice of religion by those in the upper classes? If religion really is related to exploitation and oppression within society, then there is no need

  2. An analysis of the Marxist Perspective on Religion

    This refers to how Marx felt the problem should be solved. He believed that religion would have to be, over the course of time, removed, so that people could look up and see the reality of their situation. When the distinction between reality and essence disappeared then the essence would no longer be required.

  1. Discuss the conflicts between Employee and Employer by Marxist

    Conflict may also arise if workers are not satisfied with their working environment. The consequences are that employees have no motivation to work and hence less output will be produced. It leads to lower level of revenue and profit. As I said in the second section 'Marx is the representative

  2. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    Given certain conditions, issues can help to swing voters. In the 1964 and 1970 elections, immigration was a significant issue, particularly in the West Midlands, while industrial relations and the cost of living were important factors in February 1974. Issues played a large part in deciding the 1979 election.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    life its external behavior; and who gets what, when, and how within these institutions (Coopey 1995: 202-5). The Benefits of Power Struggle Power struggle, of course, is not the only aspect of organizations worth study, and the world of politics is not just Hobbesian in nature.

  2. The strategic retreat of NEP (New Economic Policy), Lenin said, was forced on the ...

    The Bolsheviks, of course, had always put a strong theoretical emphasis on party discipline, going back to Lenin's I902 pamphlet What Is To Be Done? All Bolsheviks accepted the principle of democratic centralism, which meant that party members could freely debate issues before a policy decision was reached, but were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work