• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are political parties better understood as reflections of ‘social cleavages’, or products of strategic action?

Extracts from this document...


Are political parties better understood as reflections of 'social cleavages', or products of strategic action? As famously expressed by the 19th century French politician and writer Tocqueville, political parties in democratic countries are "the only powerful persons who aspire to rule the state"i. Thus, political scientists and politicians have been keen on examining patterns of support that political parties receive from significant social groupings. The concept of cleavages has become a vital concept in political science when trying to understand voting behaviour and party systems. Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan (1967) described the development of European party systems in terms of the historical conditions of national and socio-economic developmentii. According to Lipset and Rokkan's work, party preferences are strongly influenced by the social groups to which voters belong. Parties arise, then, in response to the demands of these voters. On the other hand, the changes that took place in the European party systems since the Second World War have led many political scientists such as Kirchheimer, Dalton to view political parties as products of an interaction of social base and strategic action. Kirchheimer's 'catch-all party model' aimed to show the new intention of European political parties to attract as many voters as they can, giving less importance to the hitherto decisive social structuresiii. This essay will argue that although political parties across Western Europe were formed on the basis of social cleavages, in time strategic action has become a crucial factor in understanding political parties. ...read more.


Next, this essay will look at different European party systems in which there are parties based around the same social base but with different political outlooks depending upon the various strategic actions. For example, Von Beyme tells us that in spite of their similar origins of the party systems of Sweden and Norway, in the 1970's the Socialist Party in Norway and the Swedish Centre Party took similar stands in the environment and atomic energy issuesxix. First, liberal parties date from the later part of the nineteenth century, however they have undergone profound changes since they were formed. They originally sought to represent the interests of the bourgeois against the landowners. And mostly in Southern Europe, liberalism was an expression of the radical forces against clerical pressuresxx. Therefore, liberalism was a product of the national and industrial revolutions. Today, liberal parties advocate permissive social policies such as separation of church and state. They are situated at the left or centre of the political spectrum. Some liberal parties have been very supportive for state intervention in economy and national context has been very important in deciding this. For example, policy spaces of the liberal parties in Norway and Finland in 1984, show that there is a good deal of difference between their positions on the left-right scale. The liberal party in Norway (V), which has embraced limited forms of interventionism is scaled 4 whereas Finnish Liberal Party LKP is scaled 5.6 on the left-right scale whereby 0 represents extreme left and 9 represents extreme rightxxi. ...read more.


xiv Mark N Franklin, 1996. Electoral Participation, in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard Niemi, Pippa Noris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, (London: Sage Publications), p. 220. xv Kitschelt, H. (1997). 'European Party Systems: Continuity and Change' in Rhodes, Heywood and Wright (eds.), Developments in West European Politics, (London: Macmillan), p. 33. xvi Lipset, S. M. And Stein Rokkan, (1990). 'Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments' in Peter Mair, ed. The West European Party System. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 112. xvii Ibid., p.117. xviiiLane, J-E. and S. Ersson (1999). Politics and Society in Western Europe, (London: Sage), p.78. xix Von Beyme, K. (1985). Political Parties in Western Democracies. (Aldershot: Gower Publishing), p. 136. xx Lane, J-E. and S. Ersson (1999). Politics and Society in Western Europe, (London: Sage), p. 83-84. xxi Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996). Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp.266. xxiiWare, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p.31. xxiii Ibid. xxiv Ibid., p.31. xxv Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996).Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp. 19-20. xxvi Gallagher, M., Laver M. and Peter Mair(eds.), (1995). Representative Government in Modern Europe (2nd ed.) (New York : McGraw-Hill), p.183. xxvii Ibid, p.185. xxviii Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996).Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp.27. xxix Gallagher, M., Laver M. and Peter Mair(eds.), (1995). Representative Government in Modern Europe (2nd ed.) (New York : McGraw-Hill), p. 193. xxx Ware, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp.36-37. xxxi Colomer, Josep M. (ed.), (1996).Political institutions in Europe. (London : Routledge), pp.148-149. xxxii Ibid., pp. 70-71. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the UK and US political parties and their party systems

    During an extended stay in power, a dominant party can shape society through its policies. During the Thatcher era, health, education, the state ownership of industry etc. were all massively changed and re-shaped. Society changed as a result of these political changes and this can only be done by a party having an extended stay in office.

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    For Marx, the most important activity in any society was work. This was the way in which society was organized to solve the problems associated with physical survival. In order to work, people have to co-operate. They have to engage in an explicitly social activity that involves people working together to produce commodities.

  1. The strategic retreat of NEP (New Economic Policy), Lenin said, was forced on the ...

    Their party was now in power in a virtually one party state; and leaving the party therefore meant quitting political life altogether. Despite these changes, however, Lenin's old theoretical premises on party discipline and organization were still part of Bolshevik ideology at the end of the Civil War, as was

  2. Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

    Where there are no pluralist characteristics, pluralists allow that it is possible for a ruling elite to occur, but they deny that it is universal as it must be impossible to any truly democratic system. Elite theorists will argue that democracy is make believe and in place only to fool

  1. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    all key aspects so it must therefore be concluded that it represents a continuation - it is not separate from traditional Conservatism. There are too many threads within it which relate to Conservative history and values for it to be considered a break with what had gone before.

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    PU introduces a gradation of right and wrong actions. However, the best action (the one we should engage in) is that which, among the available options, maximizes general utility. Happiness is: pleasure and absence of pain the only desirable end, the final good. Every other desirable thing is so either for the pleasure it provides or as a means to pleasure.

  1. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    who saw him as being too radical.16 A Liberal victory was by no way assured yet, however the Liberal use of the popular press, forceful speeches and pamphlet publications somewhat led the way to liberalism once again becoming the champion of the oppressed.

  2. Is the Liberal perspective on world politics too idealistic?

    They see the world in a positive light they argue that progress is possible in the international spectrum.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work