• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

British Democracy - the bestpossible system of government

Extracts from this document...


British Democracy - the best possible system of government It is interesting to note that no matter how hard we try to convince ourselves that our country has the oldest and best democratic system in the world, the facts point to the contrary conclusion. The more one looks at our governmental system and processes, the more one realises that it is an outdated democracy that needs upgrading. Despite our democratic pretences, we are a country that likes the security of our wholly uninspiring system of government and we are loath to change it! This opinion is probably one that you would not agree with, and perhaps this view is extreme. However, it is interesting to look at our modern democratic system and ask questions. The more one looks, the more one sees and the more one doesn't like. Let us begin by looking at the current Labour government, New Labour with all its promises and policies of the manifesto. This was to be a new era of change, of radical reform and dramatic difference. Three years on, one must ask oneself, how much has actually changed? The health service is still riddled with problems almost too profound to solve, the education system, despite labour's new initiative and huge promises of funding amounting to billions of pounds still retains many of the problems that existed under the previous conservative government. ...read more.


Essentially, the opinion of the masses is not necessarily the best policy, people often make decisions based on less than all the facts, or on gut feeling. These essentially lead to the masses having the wrong ideas of what is right for the country. Election promises are designed to please the uninformed masses, and chancellors are forced to save money in order to give the appearance of increased spending and lower taxes in the year before a general election. Essentially, what is best for the country can come irrelevant, and politicians work to improve only the areas that are perceived to please the voters. The pre-election 'feel-good' factor is used to great effect. Democracy, of course does have its strengths, it acts as a 'safety valve' and it keeps those in authority in touch with the people that they represent. Effectively, a leader that does not perform as required by his people will be removed in a democratic system, whereas in any other system of government a leader can become too powerful to the detriment of the people. As Lord Acton once said "Power corrupts but absolute power corrupts absolutely." However, democracy, whilst useful to ensure that no one person becomes too powerful or influential can become detrimental when applied too rigorously to every element of society as a whole. ...read more.


As I have already shown, the British party political system is fundamentally flawed, sismilarly, proportional representation causes as many problems as it solves. However, in my opinion, there is a resolution. The most effective system of government that I have seen operate is that of the Isle of Man. In my home land, there is no party political system, each candidate is voted in on their own individual manifesto, and each candidate is independent. This leads to a system where compromise between individuals is required, but this is far outweighed by the fact that each individual MHK (the Manx equivalent of an MP) represents the interests of their constituency and not that of the party. Furthermore, at the beginning of each year, the elected MHK's vote for a Chief Minister, rather than the leader of the elected party automatically becoming Prime Minister. This leads to a fairer election of a strong leader who essentially, along with his cabinet holds the responsibility for the passage of legislation. This seems to be an effective system of government, a democratic system with a powerful leader who can be effective and decisive. However, even the Manx system can be ineffective as with so many individuals, the passage of legislation can be slowed and compromises must be reached. Even this system has not solved all of the problems of the tendancy of democracy to be ineffective, but until someone invents a better system, democracy does present the best system of government available. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Can the use of the First Past the Post electoral system be justified in ...

    5 star(s)

    Further, as seen in the UK in 2010, the Liberal Democrats, whilst only gaining 23% compared to Labour's 29% and the Conservatives 36%, had huge power - it was essentially them who decided the government as whoever they decided to join with would hold office.

  2. A Comparison of Marx's and Rousseau's Philosophies.

    and foundation for moral activity Ideal Society: Both Rousseau and Marx sought for a society without class distinctions and without rich and poor. Marx saw communism as the ideal society because it is the genuine resolution of the conflict between man and man, that capitalism fosters.

  1. Does democracy bring peace?

    The third assumption made by President Clinton in his 1994 speech, was that with every nation following the democratic system of government that America's own security would be ensured. However he clearly ignored the fact that all states, regardless of the system of government, acts first and foremost in their own self interest.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    The length of the process however, also has its shortcomings; by the November election the population will have been positively bombarded for months with advertising media coverage, leading to voter fatigue, loss of interest and consequentially the low turnout we have witnessed.

  1. What are the main ideological principles of the conservatives, Labour and Liberal democrats? To ...

    The Labour party had to adapt to the capitalist concept and shift more central and that is why I believe the Conservatives need to be more humane and social in there policies. This shows that today's politics is more central but it also means that parties have come up with similar polices making it hard to differentiate between the two.

  2. How democratic was Britain by 1918?

    More people had faith in the system to ask questions, the people now could be part of a democratic system. In the House of Lords you now could not inherit your title, you achieved it on popularity. This was essential for a democracy.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    The largest single block of seats (141) went to independent candidates who used the single-member district voting to win without the benefit of party affiliation. The coalition-building activities of parties in many democratic states show that there are still ways that a fragmented parliament can develop a party structure conducive

  2. Do you agree with Churchill's statement that "democracy is the worst form of government ...

    Ultimately, While democracy is not perfect system, there will be no best form of government type Part C : Essay To what extent we should embrace the ideological perspective(s) reflected in the above source? Democracy is a political system in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who can elect people to represent them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work