• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

British Democracy - the bestpossible system of government

Extracts from this document...


British Democracy - the best possible system of government It is interesting to note that no matter how hard we try to convince ourselves that our country has the oldest and best democratic system in the world, the facts point to the contrary conclusion. The more one looks at our governmental system and processes, the more one realises that it is an outdated democracy that needs upgrading. Despite our democratic pretences, we are a country that likes the security of our wholly uninspiring system of government and we are loath to change it! This opinion is probably one that you would not agree with, and perhaps this view is extreme. However, it is interesting to look at our modern democratic system and ask questions. The more one looks, the more one sees and the more one doesn't like. Let us begin by looking at the current Labour government, New Labour with all its promises and policies of the manifesto. This was to be a new era of change, of radical reform and dramatic difference. Three years on, one must ask oneself, how much has actually changed? The health service is still riddled with problems almost too profound to solve, the education system, despite labour's new initiative and huge promises of funding amounting to billions of pounds still retains many of the problems that existed under the previous conservative government. ...read more.


Essentially, the opinion of the masses is not necessarily the best policy, people often make decisions based on less than all the facts, or on gut feeling. These essentially lead to the masses having the wrong ideas of what is right for the country. Election promises are designed to please the uninformed masses, and chancellors are forced to save money in order to give the appearance of increased spending and lower taxes in the year before a general election. Essentially, what is best for the country can come irrelevant, and politicians work to improve only the areas that are perceived to please the voters. The pre-election 'feel-good' factor is used to great effect. Democracy, of course does have its strengths, it acts as a 'safety valve' and it keeps those in authority in touch with the people that they represent. Effectively, a leader that does not perform as required by his people will be removed in a democratic system, whereas in any other system of government a leader can become too powerful to the detriment of the people. As Lord Acton once said "Power corrupts but absolute power corrupts absolutely." However, democracy, whilst useful to ensure that no one person becomes too powerful or influential can become detrimental when applied too rigorously to every element of society as a whole. ...read more.


As I have already shown, the British party political system is fundamentally flawed, sismilarly, proportional representation causes as many problems as it solves. However, in my opinion, there is a resolution. The most effective system of government that I have seen operate is that of the Isle of Man. In my home land, there is no party political system, each candidate is voted in on their own individual manifesto, and each candidate is independent. This leads to a system where compromise between individuals is required, but this is far outweighed by the fact that each individual MHK (the Manx equivalent of an MP) represents the interests of their constituency and not that of the party. Furthermore, at the beginning of each year, the elected MHK's vote for a Chief Minister, rather than the leader of the elected party automatically becoming Prime Minister. This leads to a fairer election of a strong leader who essentially, along with his cabinet holds the responsibility for the passage of legislation. This seems to be an effective system of government, a democratic system with a powerful leader who can be effective and decisive. However, even the Manx system can be ineffective as with so many individuals, the passage of legislation can be slowed and compromises must be reached. Even this system has not solved all of the problems of the tendancy of democracy to be ineffective, but until someone invents a better system, democracy does present the best system of government available. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    but had failed and got himself and most of his supporters brutally murdered by the Archons at that time who were led by Megacles, an aristocrat of the powerful Alcmeonid family. Since the conspirators had taken sanctuary in Athena's temple and were lured out for trial and then killed unjustly

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    By the end of 1991, the resulting political struggle had led to the collapse of the Soviet Communist Party and the dissolution of the USSR (Foreman 23). The relationship of this first Communist state with the rest of the world was consistently troubled.

  1. Does the mass media have a direct effect on British Politics?

    Elections now are much more Presidential in character than before the advent of the mass media, with the emphasis being on the leaders of the parties rather than on the candidates in each constituency or the party as a whole.

  2. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    It was then proved that he was rich before the affair, so it was reported that Dreyfus sold them because he hated the French.17 Fitch says that even though the majority of information printed was rumours, they were soon believed to be the truth.18 This highlights the susceptibility of the

  1. What are the main ideological principles of the conservatives, Labour and Liberal democrats? To ...

    If the nation was to maintain or improve its economic status it would have to accept privatisation, free-market and supply-side economics. Therefore replacing nationalisation with cooperaration or partnership between public and private sectors was the only way forward. Some people say that the "New Labour" is the third way and in affect it is.

  2. Does democracy bring peace?

    Therefore it must clearly be the shared system of democracy that makes the fundamental difference to whether peace remains or not. However, the theory of "democratic peace" is not universally accepted by students of international relations and is discredited by those who support the theory of international relations known as realism.

  1. A Comparison of Marx's and Rousseau's Philosophies.

    Both Rousseau and Marx did not believe that the division of labor was a change for the better. Family: They had different point of views about families. Rousseau believed that the family is a natural and essential form of society, whereas Marx did not consider it important.

  2. Do you agree with Churchill's statement that "democracy is the worst form of government ...

    The leaders of democracy countries can loose their crown as quickly as they gained their supports. In conclusion, that while democracy is not perfect system, there will be no best form of government type. Part B : Outline What is the assignment?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work