• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Federalist Vs Anti Federalist analysis and application

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Catherine Chavez Between the periods of 1780s through the early 1800s William Shatnire, an intellectual white merchant, was a part of the Federalist Party for quite some time. Consequently, Shatnire believed in pursuing a more loose interpretation of the new Constitution. He felt that the ?Constitution was a step up from the Articles of Confederation, since it would provide a better balance between the national and state government? (civics.org article). Although George Washington, the first president, was not a Federalist, his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, was leader of the Federalist and the one who helped develop it more. Even though the constitution was passed, much to William Shatnire?s satisfaction, there was still a good deal of debate over whether it should be a strict or loose interpretation. ...read more.

Middle

At first the Congress took on a tariff on imports known as the Tariff of 1789. The government needed this money to survive and to be able to pay off the debt. In 1790, the national debt totaled more than $50 million, most of which was ?owed to both domestic and foreign lenders (248)?. When Congress could not come up with a solution that was reasonable, they turned to Alexander Hamilton with the problem. He soon proceeded to come up with a ?Report on Public Credit.? In this paper Hamilton showed that the only way for the government to establish credit was to ?assume the obligations accumulated by the states during the previous fifteen years and redeem national debt by agreeing to a new issue of interest-bearing bonds? (248). ...read more.

Conclusion

The central government was becoming independent, and less reliant on the states. What Hamilton did was that he made the nation stronger in the eyes of other nations. This is a great accomplishment. Most people thought that the country?s constitution was just ratified and there were no arguments over it being accepted or not. In fact there were enough disagreements that made it very close to it not being passed. Even before the United States Constitution was ratified there was debate over whether or not to have a strict interpretation or a loose one. Just look at the power America has today. But besides everything that happened, the Federalist did a great job in starting up the country. ?As James Madison stated, ?If men were angels. No government would be necessary?. But since men were not angels , he felt a strong government was needed? (civics.org article). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Federalism vs. Devolution

    However, there was a strong majority for yes in the Scottish referendum, giving their assembly a far greater mandate and control over some of their taxes. In 1998 Northern Ireland voted in favour of having their own assembly and The Good Friday Agreement was signed, and it was agreed that power should be shared between the Unionists and the Republicans.

  2. The Articles of Confederation.

    He argued with considerable force that the legal jurisdiction of the convention was limited, that the delegates were assembled not to devise a pure democratic government in which each citizen was equally represented, but a federation of independent states in which each state was equally represented.

  1. McCulloch vs. Maryland

    described" and that "Although, among the enumerated powers of government, we do not find the word "bank" or "incorporation," we find the great powers, to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce . . . But it may with great reason be contended, that a government, entrusted with such ample powers .

  2. Youngstown Co. vs. Sawyer.

    According to the court, taking possession of private property in order to prevent production stoppages should be the job of lawmakers, not of the Commander in Chief. In another argument, the court held that Truman's order cannot be justified by the constitutional provisions, which grant a president the exercise of executive power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work