Federalist Vs Anti Federalist analysis and application

Authors Avatar by chavez95 (student)

Catherine Chavez

Between the periods of 1780s through the early 1800s William Shatnire, an intellectual white merchant, was a part of the Federalist Party for quite some time. Consequently, Shatnire believed in pursuing a more loose interpretation of the new Constitution. He felt that the “Constitution was a step up from the Articles of Confederation, since it would provide a better balance between the national and state government” (civics.org article). Although George Washington, the first president, was not a Federalist, his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, was leader of the Federalist and the one who helped develop it more.

Even though the constitution was passed, much to William Shatnire’s satisfaction, there was still a good deal of debate over whether it should be a strict or loose interpretation. Shatnire’s fellow federalists thought it should be loose and the Anti-federalists wanted it to be strict. Hamilton, just like Shatnire, believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that “the Constitution “implied” the power to use whatever means were “necessary and proper” to carry out its enumerated powers” (248), so that the central government could become more powerful.

Join now!

One situation in which William Shatnire witnessed the resulting factors of the newly ratified Constitution was a financial problem the country faced, during the first years of the new federal government, which was a time when it had hard time raising money. At first the Congress took on a tariff on imports known as the Tariff of 1789. The government needed this money to survive and to be able to pay off the debt. In 1790, the national debt totaled more than $50 million, most of which was “owed to both domestic and foreign lenders (248)”.

When Congress could ...

This is a preview of the whole essay