• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"How democratic is the UK?"

Extracts from this document...


Oliver Maltby Essay Question 1: Democracy "How democratic is the UK?" Democracy comes from the Greek word "demokratia" which when translated means "people rule". To decide whether or not the UK is truly democratic we have to see whether it follows the following criteria: Political toleration Multi-party competition A free press A constitutional commitment to abide by the results The ability to vote for representatives to fill offices that actually have some power. The UK follows this criterion therefore is a democratic system, and is one of the oldest in the world. However the Liberal Democrats argue that this system is unfair as is biased against them and exaggerates the support for the two larger parties. Despite this there are many positives to the UK's democratic system. Essentially in the UK there are only two "real" parties that are capable of being elected into a government, the Labour and Conservative parties, and possibly the Liberal Democrats as an influential party. In our democratic society if you do not vote for one of these three main parties then your vote has been effectively been "wasted", this brings me onto my first negative point concerning our democratic system. ...read more.


Despite the amount of people who can vote, only a small number actually do. This low voter turnout is almost a threat to the UK's democratic system as enthusiasm in the voting process is vital to sustain a good representative democracy. Voter turnout is measured by the percentage of eligible voters who cast their vote in elections for various parts of government. Image from http://www.tutor2u.net/ Turnout peaks at 82% in 1950 - but the long-term trend in voter participation has been downwards. By 1983, turnout was down to 72% - and despite an improvement in participation in both 1987 and 1992 - the last two general elections has seen a large drop in turnout. The overall level of turnout across the United Kingdom collapsed from 71% in 1997 to 59.3% in 2001. It could be argued that the UK is not truly democratic as only 60% of the eligible population voted, if the remaining 40% of the eligible population had voted then the whole outcome of the election might have been dramatically different. ...read more.


Though MP's have constituency buildings where the people can voice an opinion on an issue, the electorate plays no part in decision making, which means that although an MP is supposed to "be the voice of the people" in actual fact they don't as they themselves have the final choice in the decision making. Although the UK's Democracy has its problems, there is no better system; the only question that remains is how much democracy is required. A good example of "too much democracy" is the United States of America, the near perfect system of checks and balances where it is impossible for any one person to gain too much power. The American president, often referred to as the 'most powerful man in the world' can do little without the approval of the Senate. The result of this democratic constitution is that there is a certain amount of inefficiency. For example, after alcohol was banned in the United States in a post-war fervour, it took 14 years to get the resolution revoked, a demonstration of the checks and balances working to too greater effect. 1100 Words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    wider considerations of what was good for the country, one's class and so on. It was in 1964 that an organisation started to monitor the behaviour of voters during election and have continued to do so up to the present day.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Evidence from both spheres shows the types of benefits that organizational learning can bring. They include cost reductions in the delivery of public services (Levin and Sanger 1994: 90) and increased effectiveness of goal attainment, a product of learning that has been documented in the public-administrative sector many times since the appearance of Selznick's (1949)

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    these warships and so their share in public office by lot and by election is justified. He says that their contribution is even greater than that of the hoplites but that they must still leave the position of the strategoi in the hands of the "right" people.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    After this task of evaluation is complete, the argument will conclude with illustrating how capitalism will actually lead to a more liberal form of democracy(Daniels). The first step of this investigation is to make some attempt to achieve a common frame of reference between the two terms.

  1. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    The original dealignment thesis was never intended to explain voting patterns in Britain. I also feel, that to cite dealignment is a too convenient approach to voting behaviour. Specifically, I think it ignores the political context of elections, as well as the candidates that are involved.

  2. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    Papadopoulos argues that the major problem stems from the fact that, since some decisions are taken at the end of the process by popular vote, it effectively excludes any further appeal or bargaining21. Can the 'grand coalition' system truly coincide with the democratic principle of representativeness if binding collective decisions

  1. Analysis of Party Electoral Communications in the 1997 UK General Election.

    the result Party Ideologies - the thinking behind parties' strategies Politics and Communication - General Theory With regards to the topic, obviously communication is at the core of any campaign that was mounted. Therefore an explanation is required of how Politics and Communcation go hand in hand to achieve desired goals.

  2. Would a world of democratic states prevent war?

    Furthermore because in a democracy, leaders usually share power with a legislature, it prevents leaders from rushing into hasty militant action. Secondly "democratic peace" theorists argue that democracies are more likely to view countries with a similar political system in a better light because they probably share many of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work