• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The federal bureaucracy has three major functions; executing laws, creating rules and adjudication. The constitution states that the president shall 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed'. Congress

Extracts from this document...


The federal bureaucracy The federal bureaucracy has three major functions; executing laws, creating rules and adjudication. The constitution states that the president shall 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed'. Congress introduces bills, the president makes these into laws and the federal bureaucracy sees that the laws are executed. Bureaucrats are required to write specific rules that decide how laws should be executed. If dispute arises between executing the laws and creating the rules, it is the function of the federal bureaucracy to adjudicate in such disputes. There are currently 15 executive departments, each headed by a member of the Bush Cabinet. Originally there were three departments; State, War and the Treasury. ...read more.


The Justice department offers legal advice to the president and represents the executive branch of the federal government. As well as the executive departments, the federal government is also made up of Executive agencies, Independent regulatory commissions and Government corporations. Executive agencies are very similar to executive departments, except their directors are not members of Bush's cabinet (although the president appoints them). In the past executive agencies have been promoted to executive departments, such as Housing. An example of an executive agency is The Environment Protection Agency (EPA), which regulates air and water pollution controls, regulates drinking water and organises the safe disposal of hazardous materials. ...read more.


A related dilemma faced by bureaucracy is the conflict between authority and accountability. If efficiency were the only objective of administration, bureaucracies would be given extensive power and discretion. However, in a political system in which the powers of government are derived from the people, the government must be accountable to the people for how it exercises those powers. On the one effectiveness demands that bureaucracies and bureaucrats be armed with the tools, authority and flexibility they need to accomplish the tasks they are assigned. However, popular governance demands that bureaucracies and bureaucrats be held accountable for their actions. These objectives are not always compatible. Time spent responding to congressional inquiries and investigations or holding public hearings satisfy the demands of accountability, but they directly diminish the capacity of bureaucracies to accomplish their allotted responsibilities. ?? ?? ?? ?? Clara Widdison ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. "The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this veredict ...

    Canning, unlike Castleareagh despised Metternich, and he even called him the greatest rogue and liar the civilised world had seen. This was why the alliance between Austria and Britain was doomed, and would never be carried out by Canning the same way it was by Castleareagh.

  2. Analyse the claim that nowadays 'the president's cabinet performs no useful functions'.

    Second is the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), this department has a staff of over five hundred. Its core functions are to draft executive orders, screen legislations and to monitor all rules and regulations issued by the federal bureaucracy.

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    Government accountability is a central aspect of the constitution to the citizen, and as the House of Lords is an issue, so is the actions of the government. Freedom of Information A criticism New Labour levied at previous administrations was their willingness to be open, or rather their lack of it.

  2. "An admirable and enlightened example of international co-operation.' Does the congress System (1815-25) deserve ...

    For example, in the Congress of Vienna, the Congress condemned the slave trade as inconsistent with civilization and human rights. The powers agreed they would not sell or buy slaves anymore in the future. May be there are some said that the Congress of Vienna neglected the nationalism and liberalism,

  1. Is the EU a federal state?

    Therefore fifty years of european construction have been characterized by this battles. What is Europe today? To analyse how a federal state should be I will consider three federal systems principally, namely the United States, Germany and Switzerland. The European Union's members are definitely sovereign states very different from the

  2. 'Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of ...

    Members of the Muslim League Bengal Province accused him of 'playing both sides of the coin'.7 C.R. Reddy, a Hindu leader wrote. " He is the pride of India not the private possession of the Muslims."8And true enough through his efforts he did become the architect of Hindu-Muslim unity.

  1. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    Gibbon vs. Ogden 1824 Supreme Court decision that established that states could not interfere with the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The state of New York had authorized a monopoly on steamboat operation in its waters, an action upheld by a state chancery court, but the Supreme Court

  2. To what extent is a president to control the Federal Bureaucracy?

    to be overseeing, the term "watch dogs become lap dogs" comes into motion here, the federal bureaucracy is supposed to act as a check and balance on the specific department, but instead get to involved and let departments get away with what they shouldn't, known as being a lapdog and doing as they are told.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work