• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The introduction of some form of proportional representation would give voters more choice and better representation than first past the post does, discuss.

Extracts from this document...


The introduction of some form of PR would give voters more choice and better representation than FPTP does, discuss. Aim�e Bremner First past the post (FPTP) is the system we in the UK use for our general elections. It is a system that elects the candidate who in the end has the highest number of votes but not necessarily the majority. It can be argued that FPTP is not a democratic system due to the fact that it is not always representative of the majority's choice as shown in the 2005 UK general election when Tony Blair won with merely 40.7% of the vote, not even half of the total votes cast. And now the remaining 59.3% of Britain were not represented. ...read more.


On the other hand, it can also be argued that FPTP is undemocratic due to the end result being that often millions of votes count for nothing like in the 2001 general election, 56.8% of the countries votes were irrelevant the second Tony Blair won and if a system such as the Single Transferable Vote system (STV) was introduced every single vote would count as the candidates would be ranked in order of preference. You may only write one if you choose, however you are allowed up to four names. No longer would it be only one choice and voters would be able to choose candidates within individual parties making tactical voting less of an occurrence as the system would make it easier for smaller parties and independents to gain power. ...read more.


We can see that this system could work as it is already implemented in both Germany and New Zealand. Therefore AMS would appear to offer the best of both systems- the party voting system and a vote for the individual of their choosing. In conclusion, FPTP currently does not give enough proportional representation to the voters of the UK because usually it does not even represent half of the votes cast, in fact 50% or more of the voters haven't been represented since 1935 which was by Stanley Baldwin and even he barely made it over the mark with 55%. And so to introduce some new form of proportional representation would give voters more choice and better representation than first past the post currently does. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

2 Stars - This essay gives a generally competent appraisal of FPTP in comparison to other voting systems - though I think AMS and STV could be exposed to greater scrutiny than this. Also the conclusion is somewhat woolly - terms like proportional and representation are used without their understanding being confidently demonstrated - and the overall arguments against FPTP are weak.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 17/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    It therefore amounts to "government by politicians" acting only in the name of the people. > Representative Democracy is unrepresentative - Individuals elected to office tend not to be demographically representative of their constituency. They tend to be wealthier, more educated, more male, and closer to the majority race, ethnic group or religion than a random sample would produce.

  2. To what extent is Parliament representative?

    It has also been suggested that MPs who have more life epxerience are better as elected politicians, since their experience could be applied to help solve a raised issue, perhaps leading to a majority of older peers/MPs.

  1. Some differences and similarities between the Australian and United States federal legislatures

    The President is replaced if he has served two terms, if he is defeated for re-election, or if he is impeached and convicted *A Secretary of the Cabinet in the USA is the same as a Minister of the government in Australia.

  2. Advantages of a FPTP system.

    Even if they achieve a small lead over their opposition, it may lead to a significant gain of seats. For example at the 1992 general election the conservatives took 41.8% of the vote, yet that transpired into over 50% of the actual seats, allowing them to form a strong efficient government.

  1. The reform of the British Constitution remains an unfinished business. Explain & Discuss

    The motion passed by 316 to 311 votes, 46 of which were of Scottish MPs who had voted for the introduction. This problem has led Conservative Party to establish a 'Democracy Taskforce' which proposes that only English MPs would have the final say on the vote.

  2. Britain Now Has a Multi-Party System

    The party that spent the most after these two was the Liberal Democrats, and they only spent a total of �2.3 million, a fraction of the amount the two main parties spent. You can not therefore say that more than two parties compete for power on an equal or near

  1. There is no such thing as a perfect electoral system Discuss.

    situations or places where there are lots of unsuccessful coalition/minority governments, for example Greece. As well as this, FPTP offers a strong MP-constituency link and this is because under this system a constituency has only one MP, therefore the electorate know who their MP is.

  2. Apart from referendums, explain three ways in which democracy in the UK could be ...

    widely and evenly dispersed in society, rather than concentrated in the hands of an elite or ruling class. In particular, pluralists have a positive view of pressure-group politics, believing that groups promote healthy debate and discussion and that they strengthen the democratic process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work